Peoria Illini
- Peoria, IL
Guys, we really need to stop talking about 4 and 5 together in BU's offense.
Agreed. Looks like wings/exterior and pinch post. I think the traditional 1 thru 5 designations aren't very helpful with the Underwood Way.
Guys, we really need to stop talking about 4 and 5 together in BU's offense.
Agreed. Looks like wings/exterior and pinch post. I think the traditional 1 thru 5 designations aren't very helpful with the Underwood Way.
Please reign in the expectations for next year everyone. I still think this team wins 4 or 5 league games next year. There just isn't much to work with on this current roster. I'm excited about the freshmen but they are freshmen. Another big would be great but the young kids will need some time. Enjoy watching the kids grow next year and look out for 2019!
Illini will win more than 4 or 5 games conference wise. I'm expecting 9 or 10. More? I'll be ecstatic.Please reign in the expectations for next year everyone. I still think this team wins 4 or 5 league games next year. There just isn't much to work with on this current roster. I'm excited about the freshmen but they are freshmen. Another big would be great but the young kids will need some time. Enjoy watching the kids grow next year and look out for 2019!
Please reign in the expectations for next year everyone. I still think this team wins 4 or 5 league games next year. There just isn't much to work with on this current roster. I'm excited about the freshmen but they are freshmen. Another big would be great but the young kids will need some time. Enjoy watching the kids grow next year and look out for 2019!
Don't understand why 7 ****'s isn't much to work with here. High praises for new coach with lower expectations?
Don't understand why 7 ****'s isn't much to work with here. High praises for new coach with lower expectations?
Sounds like the potential to have 2 more schollies for 2018 to me...
So...
Most of our four stars haven't worked out over the last ten years....
Chief curse?
Bad luck?
Bad ratings?
Hmmmm... I wonder what else it could be...
Have not been used properly.
Yup. For example... Black can be an absolute MONSTER. He had several of those games with no offensive scheme and people just running around like chopped chickens. Imagine what can happen with an actual system in place
Wasn't sure where to post this since there is a discussion of Northwestern in the transfer thread. At least one Northwestern writer is concerned about a resurgence of Illinois as a basketball force in the state of Illinois.
"Underwood brings a fast-paced offensive scheme and a winning pedigree at the Division I level, and his staff has strong recruiting connections in Chicago and nationwide. Mark Smith’s commitment indicates that Illinois perhaps has a leg up on Northwestern in terms of in-state recruitment, and Chris Collins and his staff will have to work hard to compete for local standouts like Dosunmu and Horton-Tucker."
http://www.insidenu.com/2017/5/5/15...-chris-collins-poised-state-battle-mark-smith
Correct.
As an example, our 2 (traditionally the 1 and 4) in the middle will be starting about as high as the volleyball line would be on a high school court. The wings (traditionally the 2 and 3) will start ft line extended. The 5 will start on the nail. We will start with nobody within 15 feet of the basket once the continuity begins. The 4 will start about 30-35 feet from the basket.
I find it funny you are telling us to not talk about the 4 and the 5, but you are so sure of how the team is going to be ran. You can use what was ran at SFA as a starting point sure , but we are going to get bigger and better players " well we all hope " then he was able to get there. The staff will adjust the way we run things to fit the players we have. Saying we wont play different then how he had to play at SFA, is saying BU is a 1 trick pony and I do not think he is at all.
So he's gonna stop running the spread system that's gotten him to this point?
Cool :hand:
Im not saying that either, but to think he wont tweak the way he runs stuff based on who he has makes little to no since. If we land someone like JT or god forbid we get 2 or 3 guys like him down the road, you do not think he wont adapt to be able to play 2 Big at the same time.
The point is that BU won't recruit the players down the road that put him in a position to "tweak" his system. He will recruit to and teach the system that has made him a winner at all levels.
TBF we don't have a huge sample size at the P5 level. I don't anyone can confidently say he has the P5 game completely figured out.
Im not saying that either, but to think he wont tweak the way he runs stuff based on who he has makes little to no since. If we land someone like JT or god forbid we get 2 or 3 guys like him down the road, you do not think he wont adapt to be able to play 2 Big at the same time.
I find it funny you are telling us to not talk about the 4 and the 5, but you are so sure of how the team is going to be ran. You can use what was ran at SFA as a starting point sure , but we are going to get bigger and better players " well we all hope " then he was able to get there. The staff will adjust the way we run things to fit the players we have. Saying we wont play different then how he had to play at SFA, is saying BU is a 1 trick pony and I do not think he is at all.
that's kind of my thinking. His first year he did what he could with what he was left, could say the same for year 2 as well. Yeah 3 he still hadn't got much in the way of size, so why change whats working. Year 4 he has what he is given to him for a team, so does what he can to win, and the biggest change was on D for them to get wins. lets see what kind of team we have and what we are doing in about 5 years.
He ran the same offense at Kansas State, South Carolina, SFA and Oklahoma State... totally going to try something new now
You're really gonna count years where he was an assistant? He wasn't in charge of the offense then...
And yes, he could, since he has only had one season in control at the P5 level