Underwood is not like the paranoid football coaches who are forever worried that someone will find out about their game plan. Underwood has told people he’s willing to hand his play sheet to the opposing coach before the game.
“I don’t care if they know what we’re going to do,” he has said. “They still have to stop it.”
Not sure that I've seen this video posted, Underwood walking through his offense[YOUTUBE]fcwy7y7A7Lc[/YOUTUBE]
Clayton Jones just finished a season ending surgery.
I mean there's another option... those of us who don't equate talking basketball with slinging mud at teenagers could go on talking about basketball... and you could... whatever.:noidea:
Was curious, so compared existing players to 2005 players for the same year I.e. Frosh or soph. Interestingly TJL and Deron are the same for pts/min. MF and JA are also the same. KN is ahead of L. Head but LB is lower than Roger. Didn't compare Dee, but he was much higher than the other guards. Point avg for 2005 was 6 pts higher than 2017 avg. My conclusion is that it is meaningless because it will still boil down to defense and development of these players. I do not agree however, that we have no talent. Not final four talent, but enough to compete and not be embarrassed.
Tate was not a shooter, and I don't think it's controversial to say so.
I see discussing or slinging mud at former players in most loyalty threads as generally "off topic" and serves little purpose. Don't see good in slamming current players either.jcgoldie, well said. My main point was that, while it is good to be careful and respectful when talking about current players, I don't see anything wrong with being more blunt and objective with former players....and....you can be blunt without "slinging mud".
Not sure that I've seen this video posted, Underwood walking through his offense[YOUTUBE]fcwy7y7A7Lc[/YOUTUBE]
jcgoldie, well said. My main point was that, while it is good to be careful and respectful when talking about current players, I don't see anything wrong with being more blunt and objective with former players....and....you can be blunt without "slinging mud".
I read Tupper's article for the first time this morning. I saw the term "hackwork" being thrown around here... and after reading, I tend to agree. The Tate material had no real bearing on the article, and was a totally unnecessary pot shot at a player who did what he could, lack of statistics and proof entirely aside.I agree you can be critical without crossing a line into bashing players... in this case I just didn't see what Tupper's point was. The example he used gave zero support to his premise.
Yeah uhhh don't think it's time to compare our guys to the 05 team yet.
He sounds like a very good fit. When I think about the situation the roster was in after the coaching changes played out, I consider us fortunate to get him.
I'm trying to avoid thinking of Richard Semrau when I read about Vesel. Sort of an unknown big guy with generally underwhelming stats, but plenty of reports from insiders or coaches who speak very highly of him and promise great development.
I read & I know it's an opinion forum but as much as TJL is liked he s not Deron Williams as a freshman, soph, jr. or his senior ... He is a good player but comparing him to D-Will .... Sorta a stretch...
I'm trying to avoid thinking of Richard Semrau when I read about Vesel. Sort of an unknown big guy with generally underwhelming stats, but plenty of reports from insiders or coaches who speak very highly of him and promise great development.
One of many major disappointments during that coaching rein. That's partly why I don't get too excited over recruits. We have seen too many times that guys who have a strong ranking and seem to have great potential, just don't pan out for any number of reasons. This game is not as easy as we want to believe it is.Semrau was a top 100 recruit when he committed. Injuries hurt his ranking. At Illinois, he was impressive in early practices. However, during a scrimmage, he took a hard shot to the chest that caused some internal injury and almost died. When he returned, he was much more timid about contact. Was never the player many projected him to be. But he was not an unknown. In fact, early in his high school career, he was a top 30 in his class.
That is true at the end, but when he signed he was still considered a good prospect. I know now that his ranking was already falling, but at that time it seemed like a great pickup to someone who only read what was in the paper.Semrau was 247 Sports Composite #191 and no where to be found in RSCI top 100 as well as playing in a relatively crappy Division III in Ohio. Another example of a reach and hope scholarship that didn't work out.
That is true at the end, but when he signed he was still considered a good prospect. I know now that his ranking was already falling, but at that time it seemed like a great pickup to someone who only read what was in the paper.
He sounds like a very good fit. When I think about the situation the roster was in after the coaching changes played out, I consider us fortunate to get him.