Illini Basketball 2022-2023

Status
Not open for further replies.
#76      

GrayGhost77

Centennial, CO
Filet
The delicate and lean filet is probably the most popular steak. It is usually cut in 8- or 10-ounce portions and is considered a “lady’s choice.” The cut comes from the tenderloin, the most tender muscle of the animal, which runs along the spine of a steer. Smaller portions cut at the end are called mignon, or “small” in French. A filet has a buttery tenderness that some steak lovers consider too soft.

my choice tomorrow for NL # 3 and I is...................................

Rib-eye
This cut is harvested from the rib section of the steer. It has deep marbling and lots of flavor. When trimmed and cooked properly, the boneless rib-eye will melt in your mouth.

Dry aged vs. wet aged
When meat is aged, microbes and enzymes break down the connective tissues in the muscle, making the meat more tender. Until the invention of the plastic bag 34 years ago, all meat was hung to dry age, during which process the meat sheds water weight, producing a dense, beefier flavor. Then the beef industry discovered that meat could be aged in a vacuum-sealed bag, reducing that lost water weight (and increasing profits). But the meat can’t breathe in that bag, and it ages while in contact with its own blood, which imparts an almost sour note to a steak’s flavor. Today, dry-aged beef is back in style. Many Dallas steakhouses offer it on their menus. The degree to which these restaurants actually dry age their meat in-house is a discussion for another time. I recommend that you ask a server or manager to explain the restaurant’s aging methods before you buy.


View attachment 19650
ron swanson steak GIF
 
#85      
Try Delbert's in Arthur.
Delbert's owner was interviewed and he told the story of when he received a call from an assistant from Auburn who wanted to buy an orange jacket. He asked the assistant if the jacket was for him. The assistant said it was for the head coach. Delbert's owner said he wouldn't sell a jacket to Pearl, said have a good day and hung up.
 
#89      
Red tape. Enrolling in December.

I'm a bit worried rolling into the season with only 11 scholarship players. Last year we had 14 scholarship players at the start of the year and by the end of the season, we lacked depth.

I've never been a fan of the "save a schollie" thing.
 
#90      

Joel Goodson

respect my decision™
I'm a bit worried rolling into the season with only 11 scholarship players. Last year we had 14 scholarship players at the start of the year and by the end of the season, we lacked depth.

I've never been a fan of the "save a schollie" thing.

You're conflating different things. Perrin would be here, if possible (red tape delay). Keeping one's powder dry (thus enabling a mid season add) is absolutely the right move.
 
#92      

Ransom Stoddard

Ordained Dudeist Priest
Bloomington, IL
#93      
I'm a bit worried rolling into the season with only 11 scholarship players. Last year we had 14 scholarship players at the start of the year and by the end of the season, we lacked depth.

I've never been a fan of the "save a schollie" thing.
We lacked depth at the end of the season for reasons entirely different than having x number of players on the roster. We needed players the coaches trust and we didn't have that, both for reasons in the coaches' control and for reasons out of it. Throwing more darts for the sake of throwing darts rarely yields an effective, useful/usable basketball player, as we saw time and time again in Underwood's early years (Matic, Higgs, Eboigbodin, etc.).
 
#95      
You're conflating different things. Perrin would be here, if possible (red tape delay). Keeping one's powder dry (thus enabling a mid season add) is absolutely the right move.
Not so sure it is with the new transfer windows. Probably less likely to see a midseason move now.
 
#96      
I'm a bit worried rolling into the season with only 11 scholarship players. Last year we had 14 scholarship players at the start of the year and by the end of the season, we lacked depth.

I've never been a fan of the "save a schollie" thing.
I'm not. We were a little on the small side, which created issues in the front court. Our second shortest starter this year will probably be taller than our second tallest starter last year. (Skyy being the only projected starter who isn't at least 6'6", which is what Jake was listed at)
We had a number of guys who really only fit in specific roles. This year we have a bunch of swiss army knife type players.
 
#97      
I'm a bit worried rolling into the season with only 11 scholarship players. Last year we had 14 scholarship players at the start of the year and by the end of the season, we lacked depth.

I've never been a fan of the "save a schollie" thing.
Many super senior players last year. You practically cannot repeat that.

But, the health/depth issue at the end of last year largely came from the fact that we only play 7 players for the most part. I think we will be alright if we don't repeat that. I will feel even better if Perrin is here now but again that is out of the control of the coaching staff.
 
#98      
Many super senior players last year. You practically cannot repeat that.

But, the health/depth issue at the end of last year largely came from the fact that we only play 7 players for the most part. I think we will be alright if we don't repeat that. I will feel even better if Perrin is here now but again that is out of the control of the coaching staff.
The depth issue last year was due to an unusual number of injuries/health problems. Hopefully we don't see that again anytime soon.

I will concede that this year's roster includes more versatile players, so if we have an injury, that player's role could be assumed by a few other players. That wasn't the case last year, as (pointed out by another poster), we had a lot of guys that weren't very multidimensional.
 
#99      
The depth issue last year was due to an unusual number of injuries/health problems. Hopefully we don't see that again anytime soon.

I will concede that this year's roster includes more versatile players, so if we have an injury, that player's role could be assumed by a few other players. That wasn't the case last year, as (pointed out by another poster), we had a lot of guys that weren't very multidimensional.
We're thin at the 1 and the 5. Need to stay healthy there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.