DGL TBD at the college level, but I assume as a guard he's decent. Don't know much about AH. Goode we know is a shooter even though he was out.
We’ve already seen that with the Spain trip threads and talk. They are playing halfway across the world, with a different ball, on a different length of 3pt line, on 10? practices together and people are already saying we’re the same exact team as last year.Comparing the Athletic's opinion regarding the Illini this year and what some members here think on that same matter is a no brainer in favor of The Athletic and why I have used the ignore button at a dizzying pace the last 2 years..........
I agree that all opinions have merit no matter how senseless they are .....Just because someone has an opinion about something doesn't mean it is accurate.....I apply this theory to myself also as I have my own thoughts that are not for everyone........
It is the privilege here to RESPECTFULLY disagree with another poster , but it is mindless fodder to think your opinion carries more weight than a publication that does it for a living.............Ego is a subtle thing that has been the downfall of many intelligent folks regarding giving their opinions on any thought............Think before you post is a tried and true way to get your thoughts across the board and have an impact regarding a subject.............
I shudder to think what opinions will be posted in the upcoming FB and BB Game threads.......I really really do............
JMHO.............................
I'm expecting a much improved Dain, as he is in increasingly better condition and lighter which should improve his spring and his stamina. Last season was his first competitive experience in several years, and I'm hoping for "sophomore" leap from him. Both Cohawk an TSJ came back to work on their perceived weaknesses and all around game to improve their draft position. I expect improved play from both of them, especially if there is offensive cohesion and unselfish play.As the season gets closer it's looking more and more to me that Domask is going to be the variable that determines whether we compete for the big10 title or are middle of the pack. We know what we are going to get from TSJ, Hawk and Dain. Our point gaurd play will most likely be a push, some games it will be an advantage for us and others a disadvantage. If Domask can do all the things for us that he did at SIU we will be a solid top 15 team. Not saying putting up the same numbers as we have much more talent around him than SIU did but being able to play at the same level will be a hell of a complement to Shannon and Hawkins. I know some people are quick to point out that he did that while at an MVC school but they should also take into account the he has been pretty much the main focus of every team they played his entire time at SIU.
No offense, but a LOT of teams have a chance at those numbers if you accomplish those three tasks.Think if we play unselfishly, rebound & don't turn it over..we have enough talent to win 26+ games.
No offense, but a LOT of teams have a chance at those numbers if you accomplish those three tasks.
We've won more than 26 games only three times in program history (89, 01 and 05). I'd be very surprised if this team does it.No offense, but a LOT of teams have a chance at those numbers if you accomplish those three tasks.
The numbers of portal players not finding a new home needs more analysis. It wouldn't surprise me that a lot of those are a result of creaning. Let's say a P5 pushes out a sophomore. He looks for a new home in a conference like the A10. Those coaches weigh him against some of the potential high school players and opt for that.Decidedly not a big Cal guy (and he hurts his case w/the 26/27 yo reference), but there's a stuff ton of truth here:
This is sadly how equilibrium in portal movement comes... The tide will turn back as many in the future who would be tempted to move look around and start to see others waiting in the winds and decide maybe I don't need to go anywhere.The numbers of portal players not finding a new home needs more analysis. It wouldn't surprise me that a lot of those are a result of creaning. Let's say a P5 pushes out a sophomore. He looks for a new home in a conference like the A10. Those coaches weigh him against some of the potential high school players and opt for that.
One relatively easy analysis would be years of players under scholarship.
The numbers of portal players not finding a new home needs more analysis. It wouldn't surprise me that a lot of those are a result of creaning.
My point is different. What if you're at a school and told to leave and can't find a new home. While some of these folks left of their own volition, I would bet a ton were politely asked to leave.This is sadly how equilibrium in portal movement comes... The tide will turn back as many in the future who would be tempted to move look around and start to see others waiting in the winds and decide maybe I don't need to go anywhere.
A much bigger percentage will find homes when the covid players are gone. I wish they hadn't made that extra year effective for the kids who were freshmen and sophs during the covid year.Decidedly not a big Cal guy (and he hurts his case w/the 26/27 yo reference), but there's a stuff ton of truth here: