Illini Basketball 2026-2027

#226      
What's a "blitz" in basketball? . . .
Watch Tugler here:

IMB_ydpxnK.gif


Watch Cenac here:

IMB_ldPYVp.gif


Watch Cenac here:

IMB_gUdOBN.gif
 
#227      
Seemed like it must’ve been 100 at least, just on OOB plays alone.

Obviously that’s an slight exaggeration, but I just don’t share your concern. Remember the MSU game when we attacked Fears relentlessly with Mirkovic? He finished with 18 points 6 rebounds 6 assists and zero turnovers.



He did this a lot last season. You expect him to get worse at it?
Yeah, you’re off just a little bit. Probably closer to being off by 100 than the other way. An OOB play isn’t within the offense and we all know Illinois OOB plays probably didn’t convert anywhere near that many all season long.

As far as him getting worse in bringing the ball up the court, I sure hope not. The same way Coleman ripped him in the video, that same thing happened against MSU, Minny, Maryland, Wisconsin, and Penn right off the top of my head.
 
#229      
Houston blitzed plenty of time with both their guards and bigs - that’s Houston.

But now I’m confused, because you just said you didn’t mean guards guarding Mirk, you meant guards blitzing, but now you’re saying you mean guards?

If teams wanna guard or blitz Mirk with small guards and sell out double teams 25 - 30 feet from the hoop, as Brad says when teams press us, I welcome it

Edit - I should say. If mirk is the primary guy bringing it up the court everytime, I don’t know if I’d be concerned perse, but I’d agree with that would be odd. But I feel like something really would have to go off the rails with Vaaks for that to happen. Even then, we play slow enough I really doubt this would be an issue
I live in Houston, so I am well aware of what their MO is. Yes, they did blitz us, but nowhere near their normal rate.

Yes, Houston and other opponents will end up with a guard on him with switches and other PNR defenses. That isn’t what I was talking about with teams guarding him with guards. I was talking about when Mirk brings the ball up the court, he won’t be guarded by guards. If Mirk is our frequent answer to getting our offense started, look for aggressive defenses to pressure him with more than a 4.

Mirk is indeed a playmaker. He has good court vision and can pass. He also turns the ball over at the top of the key when pressured.

While Brad welcomes pressure, it is all good when it works, and we’ve seen it work in the tournament. However, we have also seen when it doesn’t work as well. Mich, Maryland, and MSU didn’t really need guards to cause the problems or ineffectiveness or errors from Mirk.
 
#230      
Yeah, you’re off just a little bit. Probably closer to being off by 100 than the other way. An OOB play isn’t within the offense and we all know Illinois OOB plays probably didn’t convert anywhere near that many all season long.

As far as him getting worse in bringing the ball up the court, I sure hope not. The same way Coleman ripped him in the video, that same thing happened against MSU, Minny, Maryland, Wisconsin, and Penn right off the top of my head.

MSU was the game I noted where he repeatedly picked on your quick handsy Fears to the tune of 18 points 6 assists and 0 turnovers. Odd that you’d use a game where he didn’t even have a single turnover as an example of him not being reliable with the ball.

It doesn’t seem like you’re watching the same games the rest of us are watching. David needs to be a secondary/tertiary ball handler, but to be concerned about that is odd to me because he did that last year and was phenomenal.
 
#232      
Mirk brought the ball up when the defense was tight on Wagler. Then we set a screen in the offense and got Wagler the ball.
If the little guy is tight on Mirk in the backcourt he will pass to the guard, who will bring up the ball.
Yup, not that complicated. You'd rather have Keaton/Boswell (or Vaaks/Coleman) handle the ball. But it's nice to have a PF like Mirk who can do some things when the D is tight on the main ball handlers. And probably more important than Mirk's handles is his passing - he really sees the court well. Poor man's Jokic.
 
#234      
I love Vaaks' game. Distributes, handles, creates his own shots off the bounce, assists and makes his teammates better. Vaaks and Coleman will help take an already potent and deep Illini team up to higher championship level.
4 things that give you a high floor in today’s NBA (guards):

• ability to play on/off ball
• shooting
• play making / decision making
• size

Vaaks has all of it. So did Keaton.
 
#235      
I didn’t say there was going to be a guard on Mirk.

If he is bringing the ball up the court frequently, we aren’t in a good spot. I believe my words were opposing coaches would attack him with quicker guards, I’m thinking more like blitzing.
Sorry, but would you describe many bigs as "quicker and handsy defenders."? If not guards, who are you envisioning there to be a regular risk?

He brought up the ball on average a handful of possessions a game last year to give the guards a break & provide a different look. Again, if "blitzed" he's a 6'9 man that will be able to see over most traps and can be trusted to pass out of it into a 4 v 3 situation. Seems...fine?
 
#237      
Yeah, you’re off just a little bit. Probably closer to being off by 100 than the other way. An OOB play isn’t within the offense and we all know Illinois OOB plays probably didn’t convert anywhere near that many all season long.

As far as him getting worse in bringing the ball up the court, I sure hope not. The same way Coleman ripped him in the video, that same thing happened against MSU, Minny, Maryland, Wisconsin, and Penn right off the top of my head.

We played 8 games against those teams and he had 17 turnovers.....
 
#244      
10 seconds would be when the clock flips to 20 seconds.
If the shot clock doesn't show tenths (does anyone know if ours does except below 5 or 10 or whatever?), then 20 is displayed when there are 20.0-20.999s, and it flips to 19 just after 10s have elapsed.

But it gets more interesting. While the rulebook merely states the offense has 10 seconds, officials were historically incorrectly guided (in the case book) to call the violation when the clock shows 20. This offseason, that guidance is reportedly being changed to 19s. I have no idea if officials had leeway in the past to call it correctly.

Still, a dribbler has to get both feet on the ground in the frontcourt, and I think this frame shows he hadn't done that even at 19, though this would be excusable
1783188364663.png
 
Last edited:
#249      
20 seconds is where it’s a violation, not 19.
Funny enough, that’s being changed this year:

  • Officials will call 10-second backcourt violations when the shot clock reaches 19 seconds, rather than 20. This change better aligns with shot clocks that measure tenths of a second and improves accuracy in administering the rule.


Another Illini rule change.
 
#250      
Oops read his overall fg%. Does that really change the point?
Yes? If he shot 40% from 3pt, as you implied:

He’d be averaging 17.1pts instead of 15.8 (yes, that’s a huge difference). It would also mean 3.4 threes per game instead of 2.9 — would make him only the 4th power conference player to average 3.4 made threes per game on at least 40% percentage (Sandfort, Milan M, Atwell).

35% on 8.4 attempts means really good / great shooter, but there’s still a few efficiency things to improve on. 40% on 8.4 attempts means you’re in the top 1% of CBB shooters.

Stats inflation like increasing 3pt percentage by 5% changes the picture for any player, but especially for someone like Vaaks who takes so many attempts.

It’s like height at the NBA Draft. Ace Bailey was said to be 6”10 his entire season at Rutgers, but measured in at 6”7 at the combine.
 
Last edited:
Back