Illini Basketball 2026-2027
Not sure logic enters into a question about most satisfying. Even if Hurley wasn’t a jerk and I didn’t have a couple of acquaintances who are UConn fans, it isn’t really close for me — UConn. Win over Duke (NET) and/or Michigan (conference) might have more impact, but turning the table on UConn would be more satisfying. And if we meet UConn in tourney again, finally having a win over them could help the psyche.
I mean you brought it up againWas just checking in to see if we were back to discussing Illinois again yet or still sniffing Hurley Musselman jock straps
I haven't posted since yesterday afternoon and there's 2 more pages of this since I last chimed in
I'm telling you now he's good!I hereby, decree that hither and yon: Ethan Brown shall be known as “ Downtown Ethan Brown” for evermore. (I really like this Lincoln-kid too; btw.)
Same team knocks us out in our two deepest runs in that last twenty years, in the last 3 years, and work a gizmo system that we can't crack. I'll take that win too. They kept us out of what was likely two finals game against B10 teams.
I'm glad Illinois honors players and not jersey numbers.
Retiring numbers is just silly.
Certainly have a backcourt more capable of it now
Joel Goodson
- it's all ball bearings, nowadays
I've watched this 94 times
Illin618
- The Dirty Dale
If we can get some muscle on him without compromising bounce/touch… look out.
No way to replace Kylan’s veteran leadership. But excited for Quentin to develop across 25-30mpg especially against the cupcakes early on in the season.
The problem (if you can call a wildly efficient offense a problem) was that, as most were shown at the combine, Ben, Bam, Keaton and Andrej were slow guards down the court.Just keep the efficiency too, but god can you imagine?!
Skeptical that Vaaks...Andrej and Davis is really that much quicker. QC and Williams, sure, but something is either going really really right or really really wrong if IL finds themselves playing a lot minutes together IMO..
Last edited:
Nico moretti also wore No. 11
I think it was a strength. BECAUSE we were slow and unathletic, it led to the staff playing a slow offense with lots of ball screen / matchup hunting. That meant a more efficient offense.
If we weren't slow and unathletic, then the staff would play fast. If we played fast, we wouldn't have been that efficient.
More possessions = less efficient offense. Less possessions = mors efficient offense. Most of the time it's an inverse correlation.
If our pace is noticeably faster next year, it's unlikely we'll maintain our efficiency from last season.
If our pace is similar, then it's likely we'll maintain the same efficiency.
Last edited: