Illini Basketball 2026-2027

#126      
In their 4 F4 years, they were ranked 7, 4, 7 in defensive efficiency. Our last 3 years, 80, 40, 20.
Based on that trend, we would be ranked 0 (kind of like how Steve Jobs was Employee 0 at Apple after Wozniak got Employee 1 and Jobs got ticked off).
 
#130      
We're trending well...
Very - this could be (gulp), the year.
The biggest shift in philosophy — perhaps after Can Crocker’s arrival — is allowing teams to shoot more threes.

Graph of our 3pt attempt rate allowed on defense, every season since 2008:

IMG_1527.jpeg


2024 —> fewest threes allowed of any season. (80th best defense per Kenpom)

2025 —> few more threes allowed. (40th best defense per Kenpom)

2026 —> WAY more threes allowed. (20th best defense per Kenpom)

….

Allowing teams to shoot more threes, has coincided with less shots allowed at the rim.

Rim rate allowed (what % of the shot attempts you give up are at the rim):

2024 —> 113th
2025 —> 79th
2026 —> 4th

….

What’s also interesting is our 3pt% allowed (how well teams shoot threes against you):

2024 —> 196th
2025 —> 161st
2026 —> 37th

In past years — while we gave up fewer attempts, we did allow teams to shoot a higher %.

Now — yes we give up more attempts, but teams shoot a lesser %.
 
Last edited:
#131      
Is Steph Curry a PG? Averaged under 5 assists per game last year.

PG does not mean you have to pass the ball more than you shoot anymore. Some of you are just stuck in the idea of what a PG was and can only imagine a PG as the old-school version. The PG is the guy who makes the decisions within an offense. Some are pass-first (higher assist numbers); some are score-first (can then be categorized as more of a SG or CG). PG is not what it used to be. He is the person making the decisions within the offense most of the game.

Vaaks was a PG last year. Keaton was a PG last year. It doesn't matter what they will play at the next level. They are controlling the offense and therefore are the PG. I don't know (neither does anyone else), but I'm willing to believe that Vaaks will be our PG this year.

I would like a definition of PG from those of you who think Vaaks didn't play PG last year and Keaton didn't play PG last year.

I'll even go as far as to say that our offensive PG may not be our defensive PG. I would say that Boswell was the defensive PG and Keaton was the offensive PG.

It also doesn't need to be the guy who breaks a press or brings the ball up the floor. There were times last year when Mirk brought the ball up the floor to get pressure off, brought it, and immediately handed the ball to Keaton. Keaton was still playing PG.
Of all the years we have heard Brad talk about “positionless basketball”, I think this will be the one closest to that vision, to date. I think we will continue to hunt matchups that favor us. The primary focus of offensive initiation will hinge more on the defense than a consistent focal point of attack.
That’s the beauty of having a high degree of continuity. The guys know and trust each other. Ideally, with a group like this, you see a lot of ball movement, rather than one guy trying to penetrate the defense over and over again, every game.
Our spacing should be excellent, as should the chemistry. The bigs can shoot, pass, and post. The wings can penetrate, pass, and hit open shots. There are a bunch of ways this team will stress a defense.
I’m not worried about who is breaking a press. We won’t get pressed much. We have too many experienced guys, who can see over most double teams. Pressing will likely end up in easy baskets.
Rebounding should continue to be a strength. It led to a lot of our best offense last year.
For most teams, maybe it matters if they don’t have a “traditional PG”. Most teams don’t have multiple big guys who can be a threat legitimate pass/shoot 20+ feet from the basket.
Illinois does. When you have numerous guys who defy convention, conventional wisdom is less applicable.
 
#132      
What!? They weren’t even the best backcourt in the B1G last year.

Using Torvik BPM which accounts for both offense and defense:

Illinois —

Wagler: 11.0
Boswell: 5.8

Total: 16.8

Purdue —

Smith: 8.8
Loyer: 8.1

Total: 18.9

Nebraska —


Sandfort: 10.5
Hoiberg: 8.1

Total: 18.6

Ohio St —


Thornton: 11.6
Mobley Jr: 5.5

Total: 17.1

Wisconsin —

Boyd: 8.5
Blackwell: 6.7

Total: 15.2
Yes, but I also think it's insane to say Thornton&Mobley or Sandfort&Hoiberg was a better backcourt than Keaton&Kylan.
 
#133      
If we don't like Torvik, here it is using EvanMiya BPR:

Illinois —

Wagler: 9.84
Boswell: 7.00

Total: 16.84

Purdue —


Smith: 11.10
Loyer: 8.21

Total: 19.31

Nebraska —


Sandfort: 8.80
Hoiberg: 7.82

Total: 16.62

Ohio St —


Thornton: 10.19
Mobley Jr: 5.73

Total: 15.92

Wisconsin —


Boyd: 8.01
Blackwell: 7.17

Total: 15.18


Once more, Boyd & Blackwell are behind everyone else.

For Nebraska though I'd probably argue Sandfort played the 3 and the guards were Lawrence/Hoiberg.

Thornton was utterly outstanding and really props up that backcourt
 
#134      
If we don't like Torvik, here it is using EvanMiya BPR:

Illinois —

Wagler: 9.84
Boswell: 7.00

Total: 16.84

Purdue —


Smith: 11.10
Loyer: 8.21

Total: 19.31

Nebraska —


Sandfort: 8.80
Hoiberg: 7.82

Total: 16.62

Ohio St —


Thornton: 10.19
Mobley Jr: 5.73

Total: 15.92

Wisconsin —


Boyd: 8.01
Blackwell: 7.17

Total: 15.18


Once more, Boyd & Blackwell are behind everyone else.

For Nebraska though I'd probably argue Sandfort played the 3 and the guards were Lawrence/Hoiberg.

Thornton was utterly outstanding and really props up that backcourt
If we're still on Blackwell and Duke, they released a lengthy practice tape. What stood out - the kid they picked up from Barcelona is unique, big, great touch, keeps ball high and looks very skilled. He could be special.

They're going to have a hard time keeping Rippey off the floor. He has an extra gear, great floor energy.

I won't be surprised if by end of year, Cam Williams and Caleb Foster as seeing a lot of pine. They're best five look like Ngongba, Sarr, JBB, Howard and Rippey.
 
#135      
He might not be THE DUDE on their team at the very start of the season but I don't think there's any way they'll be able to keep Boumtje-Boumtje off the court by year's end even as a 17 year old at an elite program. As loaded as they are, I'll be stunned if he's not their #1 by the end of it. They've got him for 2 seasons which is gonna be scary for the college basketball world.

I wouldn't be shocked if he were NPOY this season. Guy is a special special talent. Gonna enjoy watching him. Flagg-Boozer-Boumtje-Boumtje back-2-back-2-back years is wild.
 
Last edited:
#137      
He might not be THE DUDE on their team at the very start of the season but I don't think there's any way they'll be able to keep Boumtje-Boumtje off the court by year's end even as a 17 year old at an elite program. As loaded as they are, I'll be stunned if he's not their #1 by the end of it. They've got him for 2 seasons which is gonna be scary for the college basketball world.

I wouldn't be shocked if he were NPOY this season. Guy is a special special talent. Gonna enjoy watching him. Flagg-Boozer-Boumtje-Boumtje back-2-back-2-back years is wild.
Yeah, I'm going to be really curious how he looks. He's not Flagg in terms of athleticism or Boozer in terms of strength, but he's very tall, very long and extremely killed (and a lefty). I don't expect him to be a very good defensive players at the 4 and teams that go 4 out might be able to run him ragged. I also don't sense he's the kind of kid that you'll be able to hand the ball off to anywhere and expect him to create offense.

He seems to like the three points shot a bit too much. Scheyer may end up playing him and Ngongba in a high/low attack.

Take a look at any player that's been with Scheyer for more than a year and ask yourself if they've gotten better. I haven't seen it. Roach, Proctor, Evans, Foster, Mitchell.
 
#138      
Take a look at any player that's been with Scheyer for more than a year and ask yourself if they've gotten better. I haven't seen it. Roach, Proctor, Evans, Foster, Mitchell.
I don't want to be on the Duke defense team, but it's pretty false to say Evans didn't improve:

2471.jpg


Went from bench player on a 1seed to second best player on a 1seed (and on the edge of becoming a first round pick).
 
#139      
Torvik.

1st in height:

View attachment 51436

166th nationally in rim% allowed:

View attachment 51435

....

After looking at it, the high major label does seem very weird. The team stats has 79 high major teams (which would seem accurate).

But the Team Table has 92. And the shooting splits has 92. (and the rim stats are in shooting splits)

92 is absurd. So comparing nationally is perhaps most reliable.

....

These are the top 8 tallest Power Conference teams:

1. Illinois
2. Duke
3. Missouri
4. North Carolina
5. Arizona
6. ASU
7. USC
8. FLA

These would be their national ranks in rim% allowed:

1. 166th
2. 46th
3. 91st
4. 48th
5. 31st
6. 205th
7. 93rd
8. 15th

That's likely a good point.

While we were 166th nationally in rim% defense, we were 38th in 2pt% defense.

The 2pt% defense was 13th amongst High Major teams (yes, actually amongst high majors. In the team stats section, that wasn't an issue.)
The path to going from a good rim protection team to a great one, is having Z on the court more. Really that simple IMO.

No idea if that will or will not happen.
 
Last edited:
#140      
The biggest shift in philosophy — perhaps after Can Crocker’s arrival — is allowing teams to shoot more threes.

Graph of our 3pt attempt rate allowed on defense, every season since 2008:

View attachment 51491

2024 —> fewest threes allowed of any season. (80th best defense per Kenpom)

2025 —> few more threes allowed. (40th best defense per Kenpom)

2026 —> WAY more threes allowed. (20th best defense per Kenpom)

….

Allowing teams to shoot more threes, has coincided with less shots allowed at the rim.

Rim rate allowed (what % of the shot attempts you give up are at the rim):

2024 —> 113th
2025 —> 79th
2026 —> 4th

….

What’s also interesting is our 3pt% allowed (how well teams shoot threes against you):

2024 —> 196th
2025 —> 161st
2026 —> 37th

In past years — while we gave up fewer attempts, we did allow teams to shoot a higher %.

Now — yes we give up more attempts, but teams shoot a lesser %.
I assume because we leave people more open they are enticed to shoot further, less successful shots.
 
#141      
The path to going from a good rim protection team to a great one, is having Z on the court more. Really that simple IMO.

No idea if that will or will not happen.
There's 5 stats that determine how good a team's rim protection is (at least out of the data I have available):

• 2pt percentage allowed (Illinois was 38th)
• BLK% (Illinois was 25th)
• mid-range attempt rate forced (Illinois was 13th)
• rim attempt rate surrendered (Illinois was 4th)
• rim conversation % surrendered (Illinois was 166th)

So I do think we're good or even very good. The one area to improve would be the rim% allowed, but I wonder how much of that comes with our philosophy of not fouling.

FWLIW, Brad said in one of the interviews we should be "one of the best shot blocking teams in College Basketball History." (obviously take it with a little grain of salt)

....

The big note on the rim% allowed:

• Opponents shot 55.2% at the rim when Z was on the court, versus 60.2% at the rim when he was off the court. (-5% is actually a very significant difference)

• Illinois for the season, gave up 59.0% at the rim. (which was 166th)

So yes, having Z out there improves our rim protection drastically. What's scary is he could possibly take another jump with the added strength.
 
#142      
I assume because we leave people more open they are enticed to shoot further, less successful shots.
We're just not surrendering the "easy" shots at the rim. The ones that look like 100% shots.

When teams just don't have those shots available, there's an innate urge to want to chuck.

I think we've seen this blueprint a lot with Nebraska:

• They were 2nd in the country in rim attempt rate allowed (Illinois was 4th)

• They were 361st in 3pt attempt rate allowed (Illinois was 310th)

Is it just leaving teams open? Maybe, maybe not. But when teams KNOW they can't get to the rim, it just makes them feel like they need to let it fly.
 
#143      
The path to going from a good rim protection team to a great one, is having Z on the court more. Really that simple IMO.

No idea if that will or will not happen.
What if we petition the NCAA to allow us to hockey sub the twins for offense/defense.

Or do we think they look enough alike that we could put them in the same jersey and just hockey sub in confusion? Kind of like when Jose Conseco allegedly hit for his brother.
 
#145      
Big Z's rim protector numbers are very similar to Mara.

Big Z block rate: 12.9%
Mara block rate: 12.0%

• Opponents shot 54.7% at the rim when Mara was on the court, versus 60.6% at the rim when he was off the court.

• Opponents shot 55.2% at the rim when Z was on the court, versus 60.2% at the rim when he was off the court
104 vs 72 blocks is significant. When only on court for 17 mins it doesn’t have the same effect.
 
#146      
I don't want to be on the Duke defense team, but it's pretty false to say Evans didn't improve:

View attachment 51507

Went from bench player on a 1seed to second best player on a 1seed (and on the edge of becoming a first round pick).
A misconception. He was the 7-13 ranked 5* coming out of HS in a loaded class and left as a 2nd round pick after his sophomore year. I'm sure Isaiah Evans wasn't coming to Duke thinking he was a second round pick as as sophomore.

I have yet to see Scheyer turn anything but gold into gold, or turn gold into less than gold. Show me where he gets a 30-100 type kid and actually makes him something.

A great example of his recruiting graces - he has a kid named Sebastian Wilkins at the 4 who was a 45th kid last year, came back only to be recruited over by Williams and JBB.

He'll probably push Foster and Boozer out this year if he gets Beckham Black.
 
#147      
A misconception. He was the 7-13 ranked 5* coming out of HS in a loaded class and left as a 2nd round pick after his sophomore year. I'm sure Isaiah Evans wasn't coming to Duke thinking he was a second round pick as as sophomore.

I have yet to see Scheyer turn anything but gold into gold, or turn gold into less than gold. Show me where he gets a 30-100 type kid and actually makes him something.

I can't remember when i said this midseason, but that part is no small feat and is the baseline for continuing to bring in top recruits. Lots and lots of coaches either misevaluate the wrong "gold" or simply fail with awesome players. Even great coaches have had failures with awesome recruits.

If the kid from Barcelona is actually all that, I think he'll succeed at Duke and Scheyer has proven that. Your point on anyone ranked outside really the top 20 not developing at Duke stands. I'm not sure he or Duke cares though and we'll see how that works long term.
 
#148      
Of all the years we have heard Brad talk about “positionless basketball”, I think this will be the one closest to that vision, to date. I think we will continue to hunt matchups that favor us. The primary focus of offensive initiation will hinge more on the defense than a consistent focal point of attack.
That’s the beauty of having a high degree of continuity. The guys know and trust each other. Ideally, with a group like this, you see a lot of ball movement, rather than one guy trying to penetrate the defense over and over again, every game.
Our spacing should be excellent, as should the chemistry. The bigs can shoot, pass, and post. The wings can penetrate, pass, and hit open shots. There are a bunch of ways this team will stress a defense.
I’m not worried about who is breaking a press. We won’t get pressed much. We have too many experienced guys, who can see over most double teams. Pressing will likely end up in easy baskets.
Rebounding should continue to be a strength. It led to a lot of our best offense last year.
For most teams, maybe it matters if they don’t have a “traditional PG”. Most teams don’t have multiple big guys who can be a threat legitimate pass/shoot 20+ feet from the basket.
Illinois does. When you have numerous guys who defy convention, conventional wisdom is less applicable.
Last season, we had the best ball movement under Brad and the best ball movement since 05. The tip pass from Tomi to Davis was a thing of art.
 
Back