Illini Football 2024

Status
Not open for further replies.
#251      
I am more saying that the INHERENT advantages Mizzou seems to enjoy at present (e.g., size/wealth of alumni base, instate recruiting, facilities, etc.) are not leaps and bounds better at a base level that what we could enjoy.

Completely agree that, of the variables you listed, the 2 programs are relatively comparable. You could even argue that our coaching staff have better personalities and are more accomplished. That said, one program has been landing 5* and top 30 classes the past few years and the other struggles to land a 4* player and sits closer to the top 50. In the NIL era, the difference is very notable. It's why I think you can likely make an argument that any donations to facilities, etc., should go to NIL first. Get talent -> Win games -> expand fan base/donors
 
#253      
Huge difference between Illini Football and Illini Basketball. For one, being a basketball school alone is a huge advantage, there aren't that many. Allows us to throw our NIL weight around more. Football we are small potatoes sadly. Even after the 8 win season the NIL wasn't great.
I'm not saying they're the same, I am saying Illinois has a very large and relatively wealthy alumni/fan base that has proven it will (in principle) support winning teams, and if it "believed" in the football program, we simply would NOT be "small potatoes." One insider insinuated that we got a very significant influx of NIL cash this year.

Completely agree that, of the variables you listed, the 2 programs are relatively comparable. You could even argue that our coaching staff have better personalities and are more accomplished. That said, one program has been landing 5* and top 30 classes the past few years and the other struggles to land a 4* player and sits closer to the top 50. In the NIL era, the difference is very notable. It's why I think you can likely make an argument that any donations to facilities, etc., should go to NIL first. Get talent -> Win games -> expand fan base/donors
I can definitely agree with you here. I love Bret and Co. (they are CERTAINLY the best I think we can do), but the lack of uptick in recruiting does indeed worry me. We really need to be channeling more of the donor base into effectively BUYING a couple of difference makers, period.
 
#255      
I think the use of facilities as a recruiting incentive has lost the impact it once had. How different really are the weight rooms b/w schools for example? I think everyone is close enough there now that it doesn’t matter. The dough, if possible, should be put to nil.

How is is nil even set up? Can donor money be put toward nil? What are the stipulations, if any? Can they partner with local car dealerships to make a player the face of their marketing push for the Memorial Day blowout sale? Is it set up like an endowment or pension fund that gives distributions?

How about hiring a finance whiz to manage and grow the nil “trust fund”? More money to distribute. Then illini football success will be tied to economic factors lol.
 
Last edited:
#256      
I think the use of facilities as a recruiting incentive has lost the impact it once had. How different really are the weight rooms b/w schools for example? I think everyone is close enough there now that it doesn’t matter. The dough, if possible, should be put to nil.

How is is nil even set up? Can donor money be put toward nil? What are the stipulations, if any? Can they partner with local car dealerships to make a player the face of their marketing push for the Memorial Day blowout sale? Is it set up like an endowment or pension fund that gives distributions?

How about hiring a finance whiz to manage and grow the nil “trust fund”? More money to distribute. Then illini football success will be tied to economic factors lol.
This is what's so weird about it ... I don't think most of us have any idea! The only thing for sure is that the schools with the most NIL money are the best off ... where exactly that money comes from (e.g., reinvested athletic revenues, general alumni donations, donations from a super wealthy fan, general community funds, etc.) is a bit of a mystery to me, at least from place to place.
 
#257      
I thought about this for roughly 5 minutes…. No idea if it’s possible or not

How about instead of the traditional fundraising pushes of $100mm for stadium renovations and the like, they do one to create an initial $50mm NIL ‘investment’, projected to earn 8-12% managed by “illini football finance fund”. They then somehow distribute a portion of the interest and re-invest the other. Theoretically they’d have millions to spend on nil each year, that would only grow as time goes on if managed well
 
#258      
We will need to step up NIL and make sure we remain a desirable, competitive program people watch. Sooner or later, a new realignment will come, and if we're left behind, we will lose a lot of potential media revenue that helps support all programs for men and women.

I'm sure Josh and the athletic department are working on it, but as a university, there are so many rumblings that we've pissed off or alienated people that could have been significant donors to athletics. (Kahn, Andreessen, Robert Johnson). You'd think we were an Ivy or Stanford, but even they know the worth of ridiculously wealthy donors.
 
#261      
Has a bill even been floated to do the same thing in Illinois for high school recruits and NIL?? It's frustrating what a chicken and an egg thing this is. We really shouldn't be always losing recruits to an Iowa or Wisconsin in this age of NIL, for example. The ONLY reason to accept that logically is "That's how it's been lately." But that's dumb and lacks vision! The building blocks are here, and we need to really galvanize the untapped donor base here to get recruits in the first place.
 
Last edited:
#262      
Has a bill even been floated to do the same thing in Illinois for high school recruits and NIL?? It's frustrating what a chicken and an egg thing this is. We really shouldn't be always losing recruits to an Iowa or Wisconsin in this age of NIL, for example. The ONLY reason to accept that logically is "That's how it's been lately." But that's dumb and lacks vision! The building blocks are here, and we need to really galvanize the untapped donor base here to get recruits in the first place.
The bill is kind of overrated in it's impact. They just have had way more support.
 
#263      

Illini92and96

Austin, TX
This article about upcoming stadium renovations was posted in the Conference Realignment thread...

Upcoming NCAAFB Stadium Renovations

... and it got me thinking. If the money started flooding in, what would be your wish list for Memorial stadium? I really just have three main ones:

1. Move the students to the main stands and turn the NEZ into a family friendly concourse of sorts. It would improve the gameday atmosphere, you could charge more for those concourse tickets if you added easy access to food/beer and it would provide another fun alternative for a viewing experience at Memorial Stadium.

2. Fix the damn Horseshoe. I know I cannot shut up about this one, but it's frustrating to have a stadium that is breathtakingly gorgeous on the east and west sides and then have the south side be such an eyesore that doesn't fit the rest of the stadium in any way.

3. Give Grange Grove a bit more character. Don't get me wrong, I love Grange Grove, and it has helped immensely to improve the gameday atmosphere. However, it very much has the feel of if an AI was asked to create a "tailgating space," haha. Flat, utilitarian square with orderly lots. Too much about Memorial Stadium is "orderly," we need some unique quirky components! Plant some trees and actually make it a GROVE. Is this the most strictly logical thing to do to maximize tailgating space? Of course not. Would it give the place way more atmosphere and create a cooler environment? Absolutely.

For #2, I would love something like the planned SMU design in the linked article above, and I think it would fit into our south end zone space really nicely:

Garry-Weber-End-Zone-Complex-at-SMUs-Gerald-J-Ford-Stadium-970x510-1.png


Ideally, the exterior would also have some component of brick/column architecture to tie it together with the rest of the stadium, too.

For #3, I mean come on ... compare the relatively bland layout of Grange Grove to what it would be like if walking through those gates was like entering a mini tailgating forest!

ILLINOIS
FB18_GrangrGrove2017.jpg


OLE MISS
FEG8hUwXIAUMYNZ


GEORGIA
tailgating-24199-021.jpg


AUBURN
ncaa-football--mercer-at-auburn-2022_9-3-2022_2083-edit.jpg


People can start to talk about Southern climates or whatever, but I'm pretty sure you can plant trees in Champaign! We literally have a few giant trees right in the middle of Grange Grove, and across the street there is a tailgating area with many more trees. Sorry for the random rant, but I think it would really give Memorial Stadium some nice charm.
All this talk of trees. Are you trying to throw some shade here??
 
#264      

Illini92and96

Austin, TX
If we were a 6-7 win team a majority of years, I would be thrilled. Unfortunately, that is going to be really hard in the new B1G. We really need 3 gimme wins during non-con, otherwise I think we are doomed to be a 5-7 team more often than not, even with a health program and a solid coach like Bielema.

P.S. CANCEL THE MIZNOZ SERIES!
Agree. We need to win enough games to keep fans engaged and hopeful, and that any year an upset or two and we can be looking at 8-9 wins. 5-7 is disappointing, but nothing like the 0-12 or 2-10 debacles we have endured. 5-7 I engage. 0-12 I have to look away.
 
#266      
I thought about this for roughly 5 minutes…. No idea if it’s possible or not

How about instead of the traditional fundraising pushes of $100mm for stadium renovations and the like, they do one to create an initial $50mm NIL ‘investment’, projected to earn 8-12% managed by “illini football finance fund”. They then somehow distribute a portion of the interest and re-invest the other. Theoretically they’d have millions to spend on nil each year, that would only grow as time goes on if managed well
Already happening
 
#267      
Agree. We need to win enough games to keep fans engaged and hopeful, and that any year an upset or two and we can be looking at 8-9 wins. 5-7 is disappointing, but nothing like the 0-12 or 2-10 debacles we have endured. 5-7 I engage. 0-12 I have to look away.
We have literally never endured an 0-12 season. We’ve gone 0-11, sure, but only poverty schools go 0-12.
 
#268      
We will need to step up NIL and make sure we remain a desirable, competitive program people watch. Sooner or later, a new realignment will come, and if we're left behind, we will lose a lot of potential media revenue that helps support all programs for men and women.

I'm sure Josh and the athletic department are working on it, but as a university, there are so many rumblings that we've pissed off or alienated people that could have been significant donors to athletics. (Kahn, Andreessen, Robert Johnson). You'd think we were an Ivy or Stanford, but even they know the worth of ridiculously wealthy donors.
This (bolded). Many of our fanbase find pleasure in touting the the success of our basketball program and referring to us as a "basketball school". Yes, we have had some success in basketball and I'm happy for you basketball fans. However, football pays the bills as evidenced by the changing conference landscape driven by the sport's greater national popularity. I suggest that categorizing ourselves as a basketball school is counterproductive. We better support and promote our football brand or we may someday find ourselves on the outside looking in.
 
#274      

skyIdub

Winged Warrior
Nothing like an hour of Sat. football in April to distract you from basketball transfer portalApalooza and Coaching Carousel.

With that being said (swidt)....I like our O/B/B unis.....and I kinda hate my self a little bit for it.

ILL 🧡 :ms:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.