Illini Football 2026

#104      
It's hard to keep up with the SEC and top BIG programs here. South Carolina just got a commitment from a top 100 HS DB - rumor is he is getting $1.5M
I would much rather spend that money on proven portal players. With the number of busts we’ve had over the years with top 200 kids, it’s not worth burning that kind of money on someone who hasn’t played a snap of college ball.
 
#105      
I would much rather spend that money on proven portal players. With the number of busts we’ve had over the years with top 200 kids, it’s not worth burning that kind of money on someone who hasn’t played a snap of college ball.
Agreed. You could pay a kid $1.5 million for his freshman year where he barely plays, then he transfers out for $2.5 million his sophomore year and you received zero value for your investment.

You also have to be careful overpaying for a player too because of what that can do for your team culture. You're paying the freshman DB who doesn't play $1.5 million. How much should the starters make?
 
#106      
Agreed. You could pay a kid $1.5 million for his freshman year where he barely plays, then he transfers out for $2.5 million his sophomore year and you received zero value for your investment.

You also have to be careful overpaying for a player too because of what that can do for your team culture. You're paying the freshman DB who doesn't play $1.5 million. How much should the starters make?
“Investment” is probably the wrong choice of words here as neither the school nor the donors (especially the donors) expect to see tangible return on the money they provide to the player. For the school, each payment is merely a cost of doing business each year while most donors are paying for close access to the team. The $1.5 million player this year will be replaced by a $1.5 player next year. And what would’ve been a $2.5 million sophomore will be purchased from another program for roughly that same price.
 
Back