Illini in the Pros (Basketball)

#577      
Hence, if he wasn’t elated about his role, I think that’s fairly reasonable. If it was more $$$, that's reasonable too because Michigan was a better fit for him to develop.
All while he’s able to double his earnings*

Better situation (especially given Dusty’s track record with bigs), more cash, natty, 9th overall pick. None of which likely would’ve happened if he stayed. The fact we’re still trying to prove how he’s wrong for his decision, just shows the complete inability to see the matter from his perspective.
 
Last edited:
#578      
He only fouled out in one game at illinois
This is true, but there were plenty of games that he came in during the 1st half, got 2 fouls and had to be benched, then was played the 2nd half and Brad couldn't play him down the stretch in close games because he sucked at shooting fts. There were certainly games that he should have played more because Ben was just bad that year, but it is understandable that Ben was a threat from 3 and Morez just wasn't. At the end of the day, Morez was going to be the starting 4 last year for us and he would have had more freedom to take 3s and be more of a scorer in our offense. His role would have been basically the exact same as it was at Michigan and his numbers would have been just as good for us. Him leaving was just because of money. He can say whatever he wants about Illinois, but all that stuff about not developing under Brad is just nonsense that perhaps his dad put in his head. It's quite possible if he stays his numbers are even better with us, we win the title, and he still gets drafted top 20.
 
#580      
Morez was already one of the better players in the B1G.

This is a bit of a stretch... an absolute rebounding machine sure
Morez at pick #9 was the highest drafted non-freshman in the country. Sure he made more free throws this year that allowed him to stay at the end of games, but seriously ... the #9 pick wasn't even just one of the better players in the conference?
 
#581      
These reporters need to ask him, 'If Illinois was bad for your development, as you say, why did you sign an NIL deal to return and not put your name in the portal?'
 
#582      
Added a relevant stat.
Morez could hardly stay on the floor in a ton of games (fouls).
Here’s the list of games Morez Johnson had LESS THAN 3 fouls and still didn’t play 20 minutes:

— Eastern Illinois (16)
— SIUE (12)
— Oakland (8)
— Maryland Eastern Shore (14)
— At Northwestern (11) (this was Ben’s most brutal game and he played 39)
— Wisconsin (13)
— Tennessee (12)
— At Washington (9)
— At Indiana (18)
— Iowa (12)
— Xavier (12)
— Kentucky (17)
 
#583      
Morez played less because there were others playing over him. But we can scale production for minutes, by looking at per 40 stats.

…..

Ben played 25.9 minutes/game in 24-25. His numbers were: 7.6pts, 3.8rebs, 0.9ast.

If Morez played 25.9 minutes/game, his numbers would be: 10.2pts, 9.8rebs, 0.4ast.

…..

Mirkovic played 29.5 minutes/game. His numbers were: 13.3pts, 8.0rebs, 2.5ast.

If Morez played 29.5 minutes/game, his numbers would be: 11.7pts, 11.2rebs, 0.4ast.

Morez couldn’t sniff 26 minutes let alone 30, he was always in foul trouble or getting smoked on defense. Dunno why we can’t just accept he improved a ton as a sophomore.
 
Last edited:
#584      
These reporters need to ask him, 'If Illinois was bad for your development, as you say, why did you sign an NIL deal to return and not put your name in the portal?'
That’s not proven to be true, anywhere. (not saying it couldn’t have happened)

I believe Damond Williams of Washington did exactly that, got sued and decided to return.
 
Last edited:
#585      
He only fouled out in one game at Illinois. There were games where he didn’t have fouls, and didn’t play much.

Truth is, he was the 7th man on that team, when he probably should’ve been 4th or 5th.

Hence, if he wasn’t elated about his role, I think that’s fairly reasonable. If it was more $$$, that's reasonable too because Michigan was a better fit for him to develop.

He averaged 5.7 fouls per 40 minutes. It was a big issue.

I see the MoReZ jOhNsOn DeFeNsE teaM has yet to rest their case.

Is this thread titled “former wolverines in the pros”?

Extremely annoying narratives here. Next topic please….
 
Last edited:
#586      
Here’s the list of games Morez Johnson had LESS THAN 3 fouls and still didn’t play 20 minutes:

— Eastern Illinois (16)
— SIUE (12)
— Oakland (8)
— Maryland Eastern Shore (14)
— At Northwestern (11) (this was Ben’s most brutal game and he played 39)
— Wisconsin (13)
— Tennessee (12)
— At Washington (9)
— At Indiana (18)
— Iowa (12)
— Xavier (12)
— Kentucky (17)

Great so like 1/3rd of all games, primarily in the 1st leg of the season when a freshman is getting their feet wet.

Now do the back half of the season where he was starting yet couldn’t stay on the floor.
 
#588      
Fouls don’t automatically mean he couldn’t play 20-25 minutes. Could he reliably play 30? No. But 20+ is a doable sample and enough to work around.

The clear and obvious answer here, as it pertains to his minutes, is that he was lower on the depth chart than our other players. (doesn’t mean you HAVE to think that’s wrong either, but that’s the reason he played less, not fouls)
 
#589      
All while he’s able to double his earnings*

Better situation (especially given Dusty’s track record with bigs), more cash, natty, 9th overall pick. None of which likely would’ve happened if he stayed. The fact we’re still trying to prove how he’s wrong for his decision, just shows the complete inability to see the matter from his perspective.
None of us would have turned it down! What I don't like is Michigan fishing in our pond. Don't blame Mo at all....
 
#590      
Fouls don’t automatically mean he couldn’t play 20-25 minutes. Could he reliably play 30? No. But 20+ is a doable sample and enough to work around.

The clear and obvious answer here, as it pertains to his minutes, is that he was lower on the depth chart than our other players. (doesn’t mean you HAVE to think that’s wrong either, but that’s the reason he played less, not fouls)

he was 18 mpg as freshman

would imagine he could get to your 20+ number easily if he didnt foul so much
 
#591      
Great so like 1/3rd of all games, primarily in the 1st leg of the season when a freshman is getting their feet wet.

Now do the back half of the season where he was starting yet couldn’t stay on the floor.
It’s 40% of his games; not 1/3rd.

Back half of the season — he did stay on the floor, and his minutes were peak in the stretch of games right before he got hurt. I’ve already said that.

But I wonder if damage had been done early in the season. May offering up a starter spot, along with increased $$ may have just been the final straw.
 
#592      
Morez at pick #9 was the highest drafted non-freshman in the country. Sure he made more free throws this year that allowed him to stay at the end of games, but seriously ... the #9 pick wasn't even just one of the better players in the conference?
His per 40 stats were very good. Perhaps better than they were at Michigan (higher rebound rate at Illinois).

He just didn’t play as much.
 
#594      
That’s not proven to be true, anywhere. (not saying it couldn’t have happened)

I believe Damond Williams of Washington did exactly that, got sued and decided to return.
This has been reported directly by Werner.

The full story is:

Illinois made an NIL offer to Morez. Morez agreed to the offer and signed an ageeement.

Morez came back and asked for more money. Brad went to the boosters to get Morez more money. A second agreement was signed.

Morez then got a larger offer from Michigan and came back to Brad asking for an increase in compensation a third time. Brad decided not to match / exceed Michigan’s offer,
 
#595      
It’s 40% of his games; not 1/3rd.

Back half of the season — he did stay on the floor, and his minutes were peak in the stretch of games right before he got hurt. I’ve already said that.

But I wonder if damage had been done early in the season. May offering up a starter spot, along with increased $$ may have just been the final straw.

Really splitting hairs here with the 40% vs 33%, so still well less than 1/2.

Why are you so vigilant in defending Morez? We know his defense was very poor as a freshman and his foul rate was insane.

I am not sure why we keep ignoring the fact he resigned with us in late Feb (which we then increased 2x before he entered the portal).
 
#596      
His per 40 stats were very good. Perhaps better than they were at Michigan (higher rebound rate at Illinois).

He just didn’t play as much.
Just like Morez’s stats were great in lesser minutes… to an extent, it’s the same deal with Andrej’s scoring numbers.

Stojakovic last season — 20.5pts per 40 minutes. Played 26.3 and averaged 13.5.

I think he gets to 32mpg next year. That would mean 16.4ppg. Also, I don’t think he shoots 24% from 3, and we’ll likely play at a slightly faster pace. Ultimately, he could easily wind up a 17ppg scorer (it’s always somebody).

It’s anything but uncommon to see guys who were great in lesser minutes/roles, have fabulous seasons simply from increased volume. Obviously he made improvements to his FT shooting and fouling, but at the end of the day, that’s what Morez was as well.
 
Last edited:
#597      
This has been reported directly by Werner.

The full story is:

Illinois made an NIL offer to Morez. Morez agreed to the offer and signed an ageeement.

Morez came back and asked for more money. Brad went to the boosters to get Morez more money. A second agreement was signed.

Morez then got a larger offer from Michigan and came back to Brad asking for an increase in compensation a third time. Brad decided not to match / exceed Michigan’s offer,
Ooof, well that sucks. Obviously very unfortunate from Illinois perspective.
 
#598      
It’s anything but uncommon to see guys who were great in lesser minutes/roles, have fabulous years with increased volume. Obviously he made improvements to his FT shooting and fouling, but at the end of the day, that’s what Morez was.

THANK YOU

This is what we’ve been saying: he improved a ton as a sophomore (and thus played more)
 
#599      
He only fouled out in one game at illinois
Do you think that may have been because his minutes got managed when he got into foul trouble, which brought down his minutes per game? That's the entire point! When he started against Maryland and picked up 4 fouls in a total of 18 minutes, what was BU supposed to do? What about when he picked ip 4 fouls in 9 minutes vs Alabama? Fouling out is not the only, or even the primary, way that fouling impacts minutes played.
 
#600      
I still think the two main factors for Morez's exit are:

1. Money
2. Whatever happened with Tim Anderson

Playing time, role, and development just sound better to the press than they didn't pay my coach enough and they didn't pay me enough. I think this explanation also sheds some light on why he doesn't mind throwing shade (no matter how major/minor you perceive it to be) on the program.
 
Back