It’s kind of crazy the record of 127pts against LSU still stands today.
Here's the way I look at it:
Today, Tyler is one of the brightest offensive minds in the country. He's crafted 4 offenses and all 4 will finish top 15 in efficiency with 3 of the 4 in the top 5. He innovated the way Illinois scouts and recruits talent and his evaluations have resulted in an E8 and F4.
Did he work his way up the ladder quickly? Yes.
More quickly than he deserved? Maybe to the outside world. But inside the program, I'm sure his value was obvious then just like it is to all of us now.
you did. he was there.
Work environments where everything is questions, scrutinized, and thoroughly vetted can be quite productive (depending on the type of work). Work environments where everything is criticized are just toxic.Feels like splitting hairs a bit with the “questioned it” vs “criticized it”. I think the salient point is that no matter which of those camps you were in: you were wrong.
But it was as informative as a fair percentage of posts on this forum. Good start! (and try again soon)#205 Was my inadvertent, fat thumbed, mistake of a first post.
Back to lurking.
Every recruit we are interested in should get a copy of this game and be asked, "Do you want to play in this system?" The answer should be, "Where do I sign?"
Work environments where everything is questions, scrutinized, and thoroughly vetted can be quite productive (depending on the type of work). Work environments where everything is criticized are just toxic.
Consider your reaction when someone says: I don't know if that is right vs. That is wrong.
Illinois video squad is sooo good.
It took his dad about 25 years.I think jumping from recruiting/scouting to offensive coordinator is a fast-track, at least at a program with top 10 aspirations. Perhaps it was obvious to everyone involved that he was an offensive genius, making it a justified fast-track, but it's still a fast-track. That he was family made it easy to wonder
I think we still have a nuance difference. I believe it is almost always okay to question a decision. Whether or not the decision works out, they still were not wrong for questioning it. On the other hand, if they criticize the decision, they should know what they are talking about, and take responsibility for being wrong. Almost everyone here is an armchair quarterback. I interpret their posts accordingly.I don't disagree with this. My point was whether you criticized the hire or questioned whether he could do the job: both people were wrong.
Maybe the Athletic Director was wrong to promote him. Maybe the Administration was wrong to approve it. Maybe the Hiring Committee was wrong to push it through. Maybe the Board of Directors was wrong in giving it the final stamp.
The thing I highly doubt is that random people on the internet have enough knowledge of the situation to know these layers of approval all failed.