Illinois 54, Chattanooga 53 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#526      
How many are there today vs. when MJ was in college? I understand the metrics but, it really seems counterintuitive to essentially eliminate part of your offensive possibilities. Imagine football with no middle passing game. You only run the ball or throw long.
Agreed, Illinois takes almost no 2 pt J's other than Curbelo at times. At least last year, Ayo made a lot of clutch 2 pointers and it added diversity to his game. We need to get back to a better balance of 3's, 2's and layups. I would be a big advocate of around 20-25% 2 pt shots in the portfolio. A more wide open 2 pt shot is much better than a highly contested 3 pt shot. Other than Plummer being Plummer yesterday, there were no easy 3's available. There were a LOT of 2's available. Just don't understand how the metrics dictate the no 2's strategy.
 
#527      
Agreed, Illinois takes almost no 2 pt J's other than Curbelo at times. At least last year, Ayo made a lot of clutch 2 pointers and it added diversity to his game. We need to get back to a better balance of 3's, 2's and layups. I would be a big advocate of around 20-25% 2 pt shots in the portfolio. A more wide open 2 pt shot is much better than a highly contested 3 pt shot. Other than Plummer being Plummer yesterday, there were no easy 3's available. There were a LOT of 2's available. Just don't understand how the metrics dictate the no 2's strategy.
Its not no 2s. The metrics say shooting 5 feet further back fro an extra point is better when comparing FG% vs points for the two (expected points per shot if you will). A layup/dunk is higher percentage, so a good shot, but it’s the same message that coaches have drilled into players heads for DECADES about shooting the 19’ 2 pointer, except extrapolated on shots a little closer.

A huge part of it is with everyone’s overall athleticism improving and a huge focus on the 3 point shot, you get shooters that hit 3s at a better clip than before, so metrics suggest chuck up a bunch of 3s and you’ll do better than chucking up a bunch of 2s.

I think the metrics make sense….assuming you are equally open for both shots. I also think that as you focus too much on the 3, and stop shooting the mid-range, the defense adjusts. This is what we are starting to see throughout college basketball - defenses are adjusting to what the metrics have been telling the offenses to do. Will be interesting what coaches can find a way to crack the new defensive strategies to take away the 3 more.
 
#528      
In the post game IIRC, BU was asked about this and he said it was bc were D-ing the Mocs up like a mutha and he didn't want to change things up on that end.

I gotta say, the armchair QBing of experienced CBB coaches' in-game decisions is one of the stupider things humans do on the web.
They’d be geniuses if Smith hits the last shot
 
#529      
Alone? I left the room and my wife had to yell the play by play to me from the living room as I cowered in the den! I had quadruple bypass surgery three years ago and neither my nerves nor my heart could take it.
Please do that from the beginning tomorrow
 
#530      
Agreed, Illinois takes almost no 2 pt J's other than Curbelo at times. At least last year, Ayo made a lot of clutch 2 pointers and it added diversity to his game. We need to get back to a better balance of 3's, 2's and layups. I would be a big advocate of around 20-25% 2 pt shots in the portfolio. A more wide open 2 pt shot is much better than a highly contested 3 pt shot. Other than Plummer being Plummer yesterday, there were no easy 3's available. There were a LOT of 2's available. Just don't understand how the metrics dictate the no 2's strategy.
Agree on having 2p options grandison had been good at midrange. I think Kofi could be good (<10ft) if he were given more reps.

Side note, in-game analysis should identify the openings and adjust plays based on D, including taking advantage of D and gaps/openings for 2p shots.
Swinging momentum is another in-game adjustment.
This year... mixed results on in game coaching adjustments...we can do better.
 
#531      
Good point. Would you say those types of actions, like the play against Ayo, are driven by the player, coach or combo?
IIRC Ayo was doing the Ayo thing when Izzo puts in a freshman who was averaging something like 4 minutes per game to guard a first team All-American. Freshman promptly fouls Ayo so hard he breaks his nose. My guess is he did exactly what his coach told hom to do.
 
#532      
Agree on having 2p options grandison had been good at midrange. I think Kofi could be good (<10ft) if he were given more reps.

Side note, in-game analysis should identify the openings and adjust plays based on D, including taking advantage of D and gaps/openings for 2p shots.
Swinging momentum is another in-game adjustment.
This year... mixed results on in game coaching adjustments...we can do better.
An argument could be made that what you’re suggesting is also playing the way the defense wants you to.

Not saying I agree or disagree, but that’s been brought up before when we take what the defense gives us. Easy to say in game adjustments have been bad when you can either say we are playing into the defense or we aren’t playing our style.
 
#533      
Its not no 2s. The metrics say shooting 5 feet further back fro an extra point is better when comparing FG% vs points for the two (expected points per shot if you will). A layup/dunk is higher percentage, so a good shot, but it’s the same message that coaches have drilled into players heads for DECADES about shooting the 19’ 2 pointer, except extrapolated on shots a little closer.

A huge part of it is with everyone’s overall athleticism improving and a huge focus on the 3 point shot, you get shooters that hit 3s at a better clip than before, so metrics suggest chuck up a bunch of 3s and you’ll do better than chucking up a bunch of 2s.

I think the metrics make sense….assuming you are equally open for both shots. I also think that as you focus too much on the 3, and stop shooting the mid-range, the defense adjusts. This is what we are starting to see throughout college basketball - defenses are adjusting to what the metrics have been telling the offenses to do. Will be interesting what coaches can find a way to crack the new defensive strategies to take away the 3 more.

I'm not talking about 19' shots. I've seen it in tons of games this year. Player penetrates into the lane, open just inside the free-throw line, doesn't look to shoot but passes it back out past the 3 point line. I think you're correct and some coaches will start taking advantage of open mid-range shots. If shooters can hit 3's at a better clip then they can hit 2's better also.
 
#534      
If shooters can hit 3's at a better clip then they can hit 2's better also.
this is not always true. Can’t think of the name, but there was someone in the pros a few years ago who couldn’t hit a mid range jump shot to save his life, but take a few steps back and he was lights out.
 
#535      
this is not always true. Can’t think of the name, but there was someone in the pros a few years ago who couldn’t hit a mid range jump shot to save his life, but take a few steps back and he was lights out.

Exception proves the rule??
 
#536      
Exception proves the rule??
Considering I literally stated “that’s not always true”, wouldn’t that imply that i agree its OFTEN true, yet that it’s not a 100% given that a good 3 point shooter is a good mid range shooter?
 
#539      

Bigtex

DFW
But we have seen what's going on in the games and the freshmen can get back doored ,beat off the dribble ,miss wide open shots ,and not box out too . The difference is that one is 19 and the others are 22-23 years old . Practice only gets you so far because when the ball goes up you gotta be able to carry that practice over to the game otherwise all it is is older guys with experience taking advantage of youngers guys without it and then wilting when they get in the game and are faced with others with experience.

This team has been flat for weeks we are running out the same guys and the same slow starts keep happening you can only sell being older as being better for so long without it actually showing up in the games
Older doesn’t equal better.

Guys playing have been getting:
Back doored
Beat off the dribble
Miss open shots
And not boxing out

Doing the same thing over and over expecting different results is recipe for disaster
 
#543      

Illini_1979

Oregon
#545      
Didn’t expect either 52 or 60
Welcome aboard the CoHawk Express.

train GIF


We’re just getting started.

train GIF
 
#547      
Speaking of some of those so called fans, what I don’t understand is why all the hate towards the players on social media if they don’t have their best game. It’s disgusting and it’s embarrassing to all the diehard loyal fans. JMO
If ANYONE says ANYTHING bad about Trent, we’ve got a problem…
 
#549      
I think Coleman has a reasonable chance at being a pro but he still needs one or two more years to refine his game. It's as if he is still getting that long body under control. Wish he would develop a jump hook. With that frame it would be hard to stop.
Would like a 10-15 ft jump shot. Seems like it is always open for him and at his height no one to block it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.