Weird. And my bad, thought we were 37, maybe that was pre-Wisconsin (or just my imagination). Also, Ohio State still being 5 is hurting Kenpom’s credibility.
Illinois 54, Rutgers 51 POSTGAME
- Status
Weird. And my bad, thought we were 37, maybe that was pre-Wisconsin (or just my imagination). Also, Ohio State still being 5 is hurting Kenpom’s credibility.
Deleted member 17568
D
Guest
KenPom rankings are based on offensive and defensive efficiency. So points per possession scored/allowed and then adjusted for SOS.
Here are some looks at NET and the Quadrant system:
https://bracketresearch.com/team-quadrant-wins-and-losses-tracker/
https://www.slipperstillfits.com/20...ess-bracket-rankings-gonzaga-bulldogs-snubbed
Cool, thanks.
When the selection committee is picking the field, I’m guessing these are used in the process?
Deleted member 17568
D
Guest
Yeah, I was surprised we dropped.
OSU still looks good because they just blasted teams in almost all of their wins. And when the system is based on points per possession, that's going to put you in really good shape. They beat Cincy by 8 and Kentucky by 6 but every other win was by at least 19 points.
Deleted member 17568
D
Guest
Yeah, the NET rankings and Quad thing is pretty new but I believe they play a pretty large role in the process now.
NET was made specifically for the committee. Kenpom isn't officially used but I'd be surprised if it wasn't brought up in the discussion.
kiwanegarris22
- South Carolina
All are used to some extent. NET is the go-to source that gets the most attention from the committee these days.
Deleted member 656517
D
Guest
That was a glimpse of a tourney team right there. I'm finding myself in a weird place feeling the beloved has finally got to the point where my talk up about this team isn't bs anymore
Deleted member 29907
D
Guest
Not only a slight hip slide, but it has been (at least was) a point of emphasis on spreading your legs wider than your hips. I think that and Kippers illegal screen were pretty much on par for what they are supposed to call.
I personally dont consider 6-7 in football terribly relevant. On bball if we make tourney I will agree on bbal relevancy. I dont trust these early polls....OSU was in national top 5 a few weeks ago and now they are #13 in B10. For basketball ...its early but like you, I am more optimistic.
When they showed a brief clip on CBS of the game, this play is what they showed. They did not present it in the "good call" fashion.
Yes he threw 2 weak passes out front that were stolen and went for layups.
sacraig
- The desert
We were 30 before. I think our rating went down because that game was so inefficient.
Good seeing that on Giorgi. Did you see him block out THREE Rutgers players so Feliz(?) could swoop in for the layup?
WTF get over the Damn coach thing
Did you watch his leg? They made the offensive foul on Kipper trying to give the ball to Kipper, the ref was consistent
How de we go down after a victory against Rutgers?
Yes he threw 2 weak passes out front that were stolen and went for layups.
Tacomallini
- Washington State
Neither Giorgi nor Cockburn had a foul today. Combined 59 minutes. No chicken-wing hooks, no frustration gimmes, nada.
LoL....I'm really glad we didnt miss a postgame to dig at DMW.
I really dont understand the fixation with bashing DMW and critiquing him in every game. He had about 6% of total minutes but we still scrub his stats and call him out.
Yeah..he doesnt have off stats ... but every player does important stuff that doesnt show up on a stat sheet. Everyone contributed and the whole "bench DMW" is old, IMO. If he got 30 minutes...maybe I can see critiquing...but 13? Really?
BTW...TF and AG were 2 for 17 in 53 min but played D and AG got 8 boards...good contributions.
So in summary...The whole takeaway "got to get better on these 13 min" is just a continued over critical perspective on 1 player.
Sorry about the rant...
skyIdub
"I can't tell you. Secret."
Wtf??
Stat of the game. Well, other than that shooting percentage and win thing somebody might have mentioned....
The s is for sarcasm! No one is a bigger fan of Underwood than me. It was a jab at all the haters. I’m much more willing to see what happens through his five year contract than most.
- Status