Wagler has 39 points in the last two second halves combined.
Last edited:
Wagler has 39 points in the last two second halves combined.
Keep in mind, this is the team sheet the committee looks at while seeding:It will be interesting if we budge from 10 in the Net.
Averaging 19.3 points per game in league play.Wagler has 39 points in the last two second halves combined.
Maybe he was thinking kenpom. They're 61.They’re not 60 or 61 in the NET. They’re #77, and hopefully can sneak in as a Q1.
I agree. Tristan und Isolde and Parsifal both solid compositions.Winning on the road always presents challenges and this team keeps finding ways to get it down. Wagner had a great second half. Loved seeing Tomi hit big shots. Kylan being Kylan. A comfortable win despite the refs handing NW a 10-0 run with the two techs.
During that same stretch, our zone defense was giving up a lot of open looks. Count me in the camp that is glad we have a zone / different defensive looks to throw at teams. But I sure hope that zone defense gets improved. It seems we go to the zone more often when Z is in. I’m curious if those with more knowledge than me have a sense of why that might be.
Is freshman Wagler better than… freshman Kasparas?
That's our NET in the upper left, right? I do think you're correct that somewhere along the line, someone from the committee said that your NET isn't used in seeding. But, at least over the last couple years, I don't think any metric / ranking is as strongly correlated to a team's seed as NET.Keep in mind, this is the team sheet the committee looks at while seeding:
View attachment 46533
There are 6 metrics the committee looks at, 3 resume based (KPI, SOR, WAB) and 3 predictive (BPI, KenPom, T-Rank). NET isn’t one of them.
Your own NET ranking isn't used in seeding, just the NET rankings of the teams you’ve beaten and lost to.
I stand corrected.That's our NET in the upper left, right? I do think you're correct that somewhere along the line, someone from the committee said that your NET isn't used in seeding. But, at least over the last couple years, I don't think any metric / ranking is as strongly correlated to a team's seed as NET.
Looking into it.