lstewart53x3
- Scottsdale, Arizona
Jake is who I thought Ben would be.Jake Davis with 12pts, 3 Oreb, 4/6 from three. Just such a good role player. He absolutely deserves the start with Kylan out.
Jake is who I thought Ben would be.Jake Davis with 12pts, 3 Oreb, 4/6 from three. Just such a good role player. He absolutely deserves the start with Kylan out.
Will you make it home before the Cap'n is cleared?View attachment 46697
View attachment 46698
View attachment 46699
If I'm Buzz Williams I tell my squad " don't poke the bear "............His players came in all cocky trying to play physical and throwing elbows and talkin smack and the bear starting to bite back to the tune of a 25-4 run midway of the first half on the way to a 89-70 home conference win........
season record : 16-3
B$G record : 7-1 and riding an 8 game winning streak...............
Andre S. with a personal Illini high game of 30 points and 9 rebounds.............
Jake Davis with 4 three's..............
Tomi with 9 pts , 7 rebs.........
Waglar with 13 pts ,7 rebs , 8 A.....
Mirko-Man with 15 pts , 9 rebs , 3 A and numerous bruises
Big Z with 2 F1 fouls.....a career high , I think................
All in all a great game played after the setback of Bam's injury but it showed the depth we really really have this season..........
View attachment 46700
another conference win , pru.......let's get some roadkill this Saturday at smackey arena..........boiler down..............
View attachment 46701
going to go in and snatch a big roadkill win this Saturday................boiler broke..................
View attachment 46702
train kept a rollin all night long , train kept a rollin all night long.................
View attachment 46704
I'm getting closer to my home.................the more you know.....................
Pretty much.Jake is who I thought Ben would be.
We were up 27 and put in Fagbemi and AJ Redd before he came back in.
It's a bit frustrating when this happens due to the metrics (and for some folks, the spread), as it was the entire 4min stretch to end the game. I think Torvik has a "garbage time" calculation so I'd hope this qualifies. Not sure if our DEff went up or down on Kenpom.Before the 11-3 Maryland run at the end, the Illini defensive efficiency was very good, so that bodes well going forward.
I thought Ben was decent tonight, maybe his 3 ball is back, that would be bigJake is who I thought Ben would be.
Long time lurker (13 years or so), so much respect for you Combo to not pick on your post to make my first, just too good of a question to pass.So you think we should play him ahead of guys that are better than him (just because we paid him a lot)?
Went down from 21 to 22. IMO Brad should've been a bit tighter on the empty the bench trigger.Not sure if our DEff went up or down on Kenpom.
my captain is already cleared................. she's waiting for me to come to bed...........she really really is....................Will you make it home before the Cap'n is cleared?
![]()
worse on torvik. now 29th defense from 25th defense from before the game I believeWent down from 21 to 22. IMO Brad should've been a bit tighter on the empty the bench trigger.
Long time lurker (13 years or so), so much respect for you Combo to not pick on your post to make my first, just too good of a question to pass.
In my humble opinion, short answer yes. Not just off GP, but because we needed a lead guard and spent to bring him in for it. With the world of revenue sharing, spending money to sit him is bad roster/money management. It also brings questions to either the eval, the development, or something else. As a booster, when asking for money these types of things will be looked at more and more.
We knew he had defensive liabilities when he was signed, but we should develop schemes around his strengths and maximize them to play him as we do with other players. In the past and currently, players with defensive liabilities get a lot of tick.
Yeah, statistics after the "safe lead reached" point are discounted in some way. Today's game reached a safe lead at 78-53 with 7 minutes to go. Safe lead reached is a point at which no data points exist with that lead being overcome in that situation with those caliber teams.It's a bit frustrating when this happens due to the metrics (and for some folks, the spread), as it was the entire 4min stretch to end the game. I think Torvik has a "garbage time" calculation so I'd hope this qualifies. Not sure if our DEff went up or down on Kenpom.
You have to play the guys that give you the best chance to win. College ball is an ultra competitive dogfight. What you're paying them becomes irrelevant once the games start.Long time lurker (13 years or so), so much respect for you Combo to not pick on your post to make my first, just too good of a question to pass.
In my humble opinion, short answer yes. Not just off GP, but because we needed a lead guard and spent to bring him in for it. With the world of revenue sharing, spending money to sit him is bad roster/money management. It also brings questions to either the eval, the development, or something else. As a booster, when asking for money these types of things will be looked at more and more.
We knew he had defensive liabilities when he was signed, but we should develop schemes around his strengths and maximize them to play him as we do with other players. In the past and currently, players with defensive liabilities get a lot of tick.
We have one of our biggest games of the season on Saturday without one of our starters. I’m not mad at the guys getting a few extra minutes of rest even if it hurts our defensive metrics by 0.1.Went down from 21 to 22. IMO Brad should've been a bit tighter on the empty the bench trigger.
I couldnt agree more! That is bad and needs to be addressed. Big Z is my current favorite player on the court this season and he has issues that need to be addressed, but still gets more playing time. I think Plummer also played bc of the team’s need for his shooting.Its not just about defensive liabilities its about attitude too. He drove, missed the ft (maybe was fouled) and complained to the ref instead of getting back. Then after getting back he wasn't paying attention because he had been pouting, went to guard the wrong man, and gave up a wide open 3 as a result. To make it worse he came off the court during the next timeout and brushed past the coaches when they tried to talk to him.
Alfonso Plummer was a guy with defensive liabilities but he played a lot because for all his faults, and after some rough moments, early he worked his tail off and gave 100% effort.
The only person Petrovic has to blame for not getting more minutes is himself.
But what if someone else got hurt in a game over situation lke X Scott in football. Covering the spread is not that important.Went down from 21 to 22. IMO Brad should've been a bit tighter on the empty the bench trigger.
If only the argument of playing someone because they are simply better than the others was consistent with the Illinois staff.You have to play the guys that give you the best chance to win. College ball is an ultra competitive dogfight. What you're paying them becomes irrelevant once the games start.
You're really going to take minutes away from Keaton or Boswell (not right now) to play a guy that is not as good just because you're paying him a lot of money? At this point, I think Lee gives us as good or better chance of winning as Petro. I do really like that Petro looks to have some "natural PG" skills. But Keaton is so much better as our PG because he plays defense, rebounds, shoots in well, etc in addition to have good PG skills.
look at Owen freeman’s latest stats.What’s the deal with not playing Mihailo? Have no idea why we spent money on this kid if we’re not going to play him.
I thought i heard one of the tv guys saying the two of them go back a long way?What was that postgame about. Brad and Buzz with an extended confab.