Illinois 90, Southern 55 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#126      
And this leaves a huge gap in our lineup going forward.

KW and KB cannot miss time and better be ready for the 35+ minutes a game from here on out.
This is what worries me about Petro not showing much. Would be nice if Lee or Petro could give some serviceable minutes to give KW and KB a rest.
 
Last edited:
#127      
True, but we're heading into the grind of the schedule now, where every coach knows the other's tendencies, every team is physical and they'll be playing in some pretty daunting environments, which is where fatigue sets in. Fatigue causes a lot of problems that come in the form of turnovers, missed assignments, getting beat in transition, missed free throws and..........silly fouls, generally of the slap variety.

Boswell, I trust. Wagler, I don't. It simply comes down to experience.

We haven't had a game yet where the backcourt, as a unit, picked up early foul trouble. If we were to get into a situation where Boswell gets 2 and Wagler gets 2 with 5 minutes to go in the first half of a road game.....where do you go? Rolled ankles happen. Taking an elbow to the face playing MSU happens(frequently).

You can't run these guys out there 35+ minutes a night and think that it's not going to come back and cause issues on multiple occasions.

You're taking the "so far, so good" approach, which isn't a good take. Somebody needs to step up and be able to suck up some meaningful minutes in the backcourt. I think that this ship has sailed and we're going to have to default to Lee and try and survive offensively? It looks like that's the way Brad is leaning.

We have a very unique roster in which 2 thru 5 are interchangeable. There's an answer on the roster for a multitude of occurrences. At the 1.....it's the complete opposite.

In the grand scheme of things, I trust Boswell to know how to fully navigate a game, in all aspects, in all situations because he's done it a 60+ times at the highest of levels. He was flat out phenomenal for us the second half of last year.

Wagler hasn't earned that trust yet and no rational human should expect him to be at that level of having that cool, calm, composed demeanor in the midst of chaos. If we're asking him to haul 35+ minutes a night for the next 2 1/2 months and produce at a level where we're expecting him to bring us home in games....it's an irrational and unreasonable ask.

I think that most looked at the roster before the season started and saw trouble at the 1. Petrovic completely flaming out was never really a consideration. Now that it's becoming a reality....every coach in the conference is going to have a game plan of going right at the guards because if there's foul trouble, as of now, we don't have an obvious choice to turn to.
I get the point of him being a frosh... but I'm genuinely not sure what else you'd like to see him do? Drop 50?

To me - as a PG, so much of the word "trust" comes down to ball handling. He has 17 total turnovers thru 13 games (with 50 assists). That's more than proving yourself.
 
Last edited:
#128      
The best sequence of the game IMO:

Mirk screws up.
At the timeout that followed BU stares him down all the way to the bench; yells a few choice words at him and then turns to talk to someone else.
Mirk, with a bewildered look turns to KB. "What did I do?" (lip reading)
KB explains it to him, and then answers a question about his explanation.
Mirk turns to BU and seems to say "but what about ...."
BU "Doesn't matter." (lip reading)
Mirk but ...
BU "Doesn't matter." (lip reading)
Mirk Nods his head, says "okay" and moves on. Perfectly calm.

I've been all over Mirk for bonehead plays and careless dribbling. This sequence gives me some hope. He appears coachable. It also demonstrates that KB both understands what is going and the standing in the team to be the goto person for help.
This was right after an offensive rebound and put-back by Mirk. What was Underwood angry about?
 
#133      
People don’t understand what they are watching.
I played college basketball, I understand what I’m watching
What does this mean? We racked up 1.452 points per possession. That is elite. We have the #2 offense in the country. So what exactly is wrong with the staff/scheme on offense?
Look I don’t think I’m being out of line by not getting all excited we scored 90 on Southern, that isn’t my point.
I will die on the hill that we won’t succeed shooting 34 threes a night and that we need more set plays to rely on in crunch time and out of dead ball situations. I’d like to see some of those at least attempted against a team like Southern that we can pull out against MSU, Purdue or whoever we play in the NCAA tournament.

At the end of the day defense and rebounding is what will make this team succeed and that’s been much much better the last two games.
 
#134      
Lol I must have missed where EVERYONE has loved our offensive scheme and never complained about living and dying by the 3 the last two years. Our players are good, they score the ball.

That. Isn’t. My. Point.
 
#135      
cw17.gif


cwplus22.gif


wos02.jpg


we won by 35........................nuff said.........................next game.............

200w (1).gif
200w (1).gif
200w (1).gif
200w (1).gif


psyc117.gif


psyc99.gif
 
#136      
16-3 should be the goal. This years team has too high of a floor to lose @Northwestern & if we are already penciling a loss @Iowa than we should no longer have discussions about a B1G title or anything beyond the sweet 16. This group is too good to not expect more.
If we keep playing this hard and with the focus on defense we’ve had the last two games I believe we will. Even though everyone is out to get me on here right now lol
 
#137      
Agree with the bolded. Now, what if both pick up two first half fouls or God forbid a third? How does Brad navigate what was once 35+ minutes per game to 25 on that particular night?

There is a large fall off of expectation and reliability from Wagler, Boswell........and everyone else when it comes to being a primary ball handler and the responsibilities that come with it.

How many college teams are going to function well without both of their starting guards in the game? Its early season so a lot of teams minutes are more distributed because of blowouts but what we've already seen is a pretty defined 8 man rotation. Thats exactly what you would expect in games that matter. We actually have a chance to see that grow a little bit with Lee earning more minutes as he comes back from his missed time. Im guessing he would have played more minutes if not for his ankle injury.
 
#138      
Pretty solid effort for a matinee buy game over holiday break. A few too many turnovers but otherwise pretty solid execution on both sides. Did feel like we were in the lab a little bit, so to speak, in that we put out a lot of lineups we haven’t really seen before. Hopefully can use this game to shore up our focus on taking care of the ball. Only way Penn State hangs with us is if we turn it over a whole bunch. Bring on conference season!
 
#139      
People just don’t like the style so it’s not good.
In my younger life I was a decent rebounder at the intramural level. Had a game where my team won because I had a lot of offensive rebounds. After the game one of my teammates told me he didn’t like to win like that. It wasn’t basketball.

I think a lot of people feel like that. Basketball should be beautiful ball handling and textbook jump shooting and guards passing to big men in the post.

But the game has changed. You need beasts who overpower and outwork their opponent (Wilt and Shaq). You need bigs who can handle and shoot (Magic and Larry). You need players who can beat people off the dribble (Jordan) and you need guys who can play D and get 10 offensive rebounds (Rodman). And you need 3s (Curry) to open up driving lanes and to create space. Each of these players caused the game to change in how you scheme and how you recruit.

Bob Knight basketball is DEAD. IMO, instead of complaining about the fact life changes try enjoying it instead. And maybe realize where it is today is an evolution that started years ago.
 
#140      
I haven’t watched this game yet, so I don’t know how disappointing MP’s play was, but does no one remember the UTRGV game? He played around 15 minutes and played pretty well. The comments after that game were the exact opposite of this game.

Dariush Takhtehchian, M.D
@takhtehchianmd
22-year-old Mihailo Petrovic. As advertised. Already has 12 pts, 3 dimes, 2 boards in 12 minutes

Someone posted, "I need more Mihailo."

And another: I'll go out on a limb here and say we got a good one in Petrovic.
Really good, really quick.

And other similar posts.

I think he can still be a good PG. I just don’t know why he isn’t more consistently good like he was in the UTRGV game, other than the many reasons that have been posited here already: got to campus late, hamstring injury, didn’t get to practice more with the team, not enough minutes when he does play to get into a rhythm, and maybe trying too hard when he is in, that is he overextends himself and makes mistakes. Sadly, he does not seem to be improving, but why can he play so well against UTRGV and not in any later games? My money is on the fact that he just doesn’t get enough minutes in actual games. But I also see the other side, that he doesn’t make the most of the minutes he has, and hasn’t improved since UTRGV.
 
#141      
It wouldn't matter if Wagler happened to be just a slightly above average frosh. Petro has demonstrated he just isn't cut out for the level of basketball our team is aspiring to play. He doesn't have the mentality or the energy required. If Wagler weren't as amazing as he is, Lee would earn minutes before Petro. Mihailo's casual turnover followed by the loafing back on D in the first half pretty much cemented it for me, and judging by Brad's quick yank after that play, I think that pretty much did it for our coaching staff as well. I wish Petro nothing but the best from here, but I don't think we're going to see much more of him playing any meaningful minutes as an Illini.
Agree at this point.

Glass half full, though.
Petrovic and Lee were injured/ out of practice for quite some time. Missed month+ I think. Now school is out on break, and healthy, plenty of time to practice. Need game reps to keep improving. Both new to college ball. Get some minutes, learn, cut down mistakes, repeat. Schedule will change in the new year- games every 3/4 days. Will need contributions- some days KW and KB will need a break.
 
#142      
I am beginning to see why MP is sitting and not playing.
1. A guard at his size has to be able to take care of the ball and score at a high %age....but his consistent turnovers and mundane scoring ability have dug him a big hole out of which to climb. Quick opposing guards make his penetration difficult at times.
2. His lack of defensive effectiveness has become more and more noticeable while he lacks elite quickness with the ball. As his highlight videos showed, he can be effective in the open court on offense, but has a difficult time in the half court at both ends.

He is fun to watch when he makes the occasional flashy play, but at his age and compared to Lee, which one is more likely to contribute over the next couple of years? He may be trying hard to get attention, but if so, that effort has led to too many unfortunate moments to date. I was glad to see him get the opportunity when KB went down, but his ensuing play did not impress anyone. Bottom line is that I am doubtful that he can overcome his limitations to the point where his strengths can prove a plus.

I hate to see a coach give up on any player who is needed, albeit in a bench role, but I think that is likely the case this year for MP. So far, this second Curbelo experiment is a replay.
Haven't seen Petro crying on the sidelines and jumping into Brad's arms.
 
#143      
@illini0440 Regarding NIL for someone like Wagler…do coaches (football/basketball) adjust NIL if a player breaks out like this? Like, I kind of assume he wasn’t getting a ton just based on recruiting rankings…but based on where he is now do they find ways to increase the NIL he’s getting? What’s the standard for something like this?
Just switch his and Petro's deals...
 
#144      
Assist to TO isn't an official stat in record books, but by far the two best I can personally find both happened (ironically) in the same season.

Bruce Douglas in 85-86: 3.62

Tony Wysinger in 85-86: 3.53
Wonder how McCamey did...?
 
#147      
@illini0440 Regarding NIL for someone like Wagler…do coaches (football/basketball) adjust NIL if a player breaks out like this? Like, I kind of assume he wasn’t getting a ton just based on recruiting rankings…but based on where he is now do they find ways to increase the NIL he’s getting? What’s the standard for something like this?
It probably depends on the agreement/contract. If it's a fixed contract, you'd have to get creative to change things...never hurts to ask for a new one. I would think many contracts for established players have incentives, which might be slightly odd for a freshman, but you never know...
 
#148      
I am beginning to see why MP is sitting and not playing.
1. A guard at his size has to be able to take care of the ball and score at a high %age....but his consistent turnovers and mundane scoring ability have dug him a big hole out of which to climb. Quick opposing guards make his penetration difficult at times.
2. His lack of defensive effectiveness has become more and more noticeable while he lacks elite quickness with the ball. As his highlight videos showed, he can be effective in the open court on offense, but has a difficult time in the half court at both ends.

He is fun to watch when he makes the occasional flashy play, but at his age and compared to Lee, which one is more likely to contribute over the next couple of years? He may be trying hard to get attention, but if so, that effort has led to too many unfortunate moments to date. I was glad to see him get the opportunity when KB went down, but his ensuing play did not impress anyone. Bottom line is that I am doubtful that he can overcome his limitations to the point where his strengths can prove a plus.

I hate to see a coach give up on any player who is needed, albeit in a bench role, but I think that is likely the case this year for MP. So far, this second Curbelo experiment is a replay.
With Curbelo, I remember a lot of jumping up and down and cheering some amazing passes and high energy play and also some head scratching and cursing after some poor decisions pre-concussion. So far, I have only done the second part with Petro. But I still have hope... I guess.
 
#149      
I played college basketball, I understand what I’m watching

Look I don’t think I’m being out of line by not getting all excited we scored 90 on Southern, that isn’t my point.
I will die on the hill that we won’t succeed shooting 34 threes a night and that we need more set plays to rely on in crunch time and out of dead ball situations. I’d like to see some of those at least attempted against a team like Southern that we can pull out against MSU, Purdue or whoever we play in the NCAA tournament.

At the end of the day defense and rebounding is what will make this team succeed and that’s been much much better the last two games.

Illinois does not "shoot 34 threes a night"... currently averaging 29.6 on the season... regardless of the number (many successful programs are shooting even more of them than we are), part of what makes our offensive scheme so successful is getting up a lot of threes and rebounding misses at one of the highest rates in the country. So the number of 3 point attempts is by design, and not by "inability of or apathy to running set plays".

You do not think we run set plays in crunch time or out of dead ball situations? There are plenty of full-game vids on YouTube. Go check them out, its totally free. 🔶🔷
 
#150      
Illinois does not "shoot 34 threes a night"... currently averaging 29.6 on the season... regardless of the number (many successful programs are shooting even more of them than we are), part of what makes our offensive scheme so successful is getting up a lot of threes and rebounding misses at one of the highest rates in the country. So the number of 3 point attempts is by design, and not by "inability of or apathy to running set plays".

You do not think we run set plays in crunch time or out of dead ball situations? There are plenty of full-game vids on YouTube. Go check them out, its totally free. 🔶🔷
a lot of people (including me) don’t watch the modern NBA it appears. Teams in the NBA are averaging about 37.0 three-point attempts per game per team so far this season. it’s just the way it is now, which is heavily influenced by analytics
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back