Illinois 95, Iowa 85 Postgame

#202      
Still mad about penn state
IMG_1882.jpeg
 
#203      
I'm as happy for Nico as the next guy, but you have to give most of the credit to the other four players on the court, IMO. And that four changed back and forth a little.

It's not like Nico was fighting off double teams or heck even being guarded that closely. Glad we have him but tap the brakes a little.
Nico was going to be a solid contributer at pg all year if not for the injury. It's almost like the John Paddock scenario where the offense just runs smoother and looks more in sync when he's running point. No he's not as athletic or maybe the scoring threat we would like and is a defensive liability at times but he is solid and uses pace better than anyone else we have. I see what Brad has said about him that the the offensive flow is better when he in on the floor.
 
#206      
View attachment 31437I think there exists a universe where that lineup can certainly work as an alternative to booty ball…and everything bogging down at times…I love Domask. But he’s like the overworked plow-horse. I’d sub more liberally overall. Get Marcus a blow and get him back in there.

To answer your question

Nico
Harmon
Shannon
Ty Rodgers
Coleman Hawkins

You could sub Marcus back in for Nico, Harmon, or Ty…most likely. I dunno? It would depend on circumstances.

If Harmon is having a crummy game…next outing…Marcus goes back in for him. Nothing says we can’t rotate starters relative to our opponent. Boooty ball can certainly be a sec
ond unit type thing….similar to what we did successfully with Curbelo for a time.

Nico, Domask, Shannon, Ty, and Coleman on the floor at the same time sounds damn interesting too.

It's crazy that we are so versatile on offense, booty ball, isolations, high low, drive and kick, post feeds, weak side cuts, etc.
 
#207      
i would be surprised if Moretti logged 20 minutes a game moving forward. I like his skill set, but his ability to stay in front of quicker, smaller guards would be an issue and bigger guards would take him to the woodshed. If you factor in the constant switching on defense, he would be a real liability on defense. It would be the same thing you see from Dainja.
Well we haven't got anybody who has shown that they can stay in front of quicker athletic gaurds on a regular basis. Moretti might as well get some more minutes since he at least can run the offense.
 
#210      
i would be surprised if Moretti logged 20 minutes a game moving forward. I like his skill set, but his ability to stay in front of quicker, smaller guards would be an issue and bigger guards would take him to the woodshed. If you factor in the constant switching on defense, he would be a real liability on defense. It would be the same thing you see from Dainja.
I see your point, but a good portion of our other starters aren’t exactly setting the world on fire defensively either.
 
#212      
It's a lot more enjoyable to see us not switching 15 times per possession. I get why we started doing it because we have so many versatile pieces but I've always felt constant switching is just lazy defense.

Glad to see some bite in our defense towards the end of the game.
 
#217      
I see your point, but a good portion of our other starters aren’t exactly setting the world on fire defensively either.
I do think Underwood does need to get minutes for those who can make some contribution, if for no other reason than to give the top 8 a little rest. Where court time is concerned, I’m always going to rely on the judgment of those that see these guys in practice every day. There’s nothing easier in this world than second guessing.
 
#218      
Question is: what does bu do?

Bench Ty to relieve the other positions besides PG? Stronger bench.
Start Moretti? Illinois do need a true PG who can shoot the 3.

Sub Hansberry and DD more? I believe so, if DD can just finish around the basket from .5 feet away.
Limit Domask's offensive output? He was non-existent in the 2nd half. Good to have as a threat anyway.

I typed before not to give up on Goode, but maybe with Moretti's play and other subs being adequate, maybe his playing time should be limited. Then MAC school next year, if he chooses.
You redefine . . .
Feeling Dumb Jim Carrey GIF
 
#219      
I mean today wasn't exactly a "we're fine, everything's great" performance either, but at least we saw some interesting new possibilities.
Yeah, don’t get me wrong … my wife had to walk me off the ledge in the first half, and I was about done hoping for much of anything from this squad. Today reignited my hope … I’m certainly not penciling this team into my bracket’s Sweet Sixteen if I’m not an Illini fan.
 
#220      
It's a lot more enjoyable to see us not switching 15 times per possession. I get why we started doing it because we have so many versatile pieces but I've always felt constant switching is just lazy defense.

Glad to see some bite in our defense towards the end of the game.
I think the switching could work, but this team just doesn't communicate well enough to make it happen. So many blown switches. And then they go under screens and still get torched on dribble drives.
 
#225      
Watched a lot of basketball today, so can’t remember: is this is a Hawkins sucks or a Coleman is great day?

[In case not obvious, that wasn’t a swipe on CH.]