Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#155      
Creates a fun fan question. If you could bring back two of the following, who are you choosing?

JC Davis
Gabe Jacas
Xavier Scott
would depend on the options available to replace them.
Without major portal additions, our depth behind LT is terrible compared to edge and DB. Would make Davis the most valuable, even if the other 2 may be the best players.
 
#156      
Going to be interesting to see who out of 3 leaves. Would rather have Scott and Jacas back and just get two more OL’s but tough choice.
 
#158      
Why does everyone think it’s set in stone that one of them is gone?
Excuse Me Wow GIF by Mashable
 
#160      
Why does everyone think it’s set in stone that one of them is gone?
Idk, it's not. In the tweet he stated, "Some things still to clear up with (names) but feel good about the majority of those guys." "things still to clear up" could easily signal "working on it."
Oh, and Illinois had 14 All-BIG selections this past year: Scott, Bryant, Jacas, JC Davis, Hank Beatty, Altmyer, Gesky, Kruetz., Priestly, Rosiek, TeRah, Bailey, Lane Hansen, Olano. Take away Bryant and Edwards (no eligibility), that's whom he refers to as the "12 All Big Ten guys."
Definitely possible he's referring to one of these guys.
 
#162      
Why does everyone think it’s set in stone that one of them is gone?
Because the incessantly negative, nauseatingly ignorant posters, who tear down the team in every game thread, just can’t help themselves.

They posted a few positive posts yesterday, for the first time ever, & now have to crap all over the recruiting thread, with ridiculous supposition & negativity.
 
#163      
Because the incessantly negative, nauseatingly ignorant posters, who tear down the team in every game thread, just can’t help themselves.

They posted a few positive posts yesterday, for the first time ever, & now have to crap all over the recruiting thread, with ridiculous supposition & negativity.
kinda true ...
 
#165      
Because the incessantly negative, nauseatingly ignorant posters, who tear down the team in every game thread, just can’t help themselves.

They posted a few positive posts yesterday, for the first time ever, & now have to crap all over the recruiting thread, with ridiculous supposition & negativity.
Or maybe the coaches comments lends people to believe that one of them are not a lock and could possibly leave? Good grief, could you over react a little bit more yourself? We are only going by the coaches comments and he made sound like that one of the players may not come back. why is that so hard to understand?
 
#167      
Because the incessantly negative, nauseatingly ignorant posters, who tear down the team in every game thread, just can’t help themselves.

They posted a few positive posts yesterday, for the first time ever, & now have to crap all over the recruiting thread, with ridiculous supposition & negativity.
Thank You! They know who they are.
 
#169      
Very confused. Again, it's totally plausible that Jacas doesn't come back, but when did Bret "lend people to believe" that Jacas (or any of those three) is not coming back?

He says "think we can get 11 of the 12 (returning) All-BIG guys back", "some things to still clear up with Jacas, Scott, Davis" and "feel good about the majority of those guys" ("majority of those guys" meaning the All-BIG guys and essential pieces). Out of Jacas, Scott, Davis - 2/3 and maybe 3/3 with Jacas as the wild card was always the likeliest outcome, but Bret's quotes don't move the table one bit.

Some are just way too inclined to suppose factuality and stand on it with little to no validation of merit.
 
Last edited:
#173      
Very confused. Again, it's totally plausible that Jacas doesn't come back, but when did Bret "lend people to believe" that Jacas (or any of those three) is not coming back?

He says "think we can get 11 of the 12 (returning) All-BIG guys back", "some things to still clear up with Jacas, Scott, Davis" and "feel good about the majority of those guys" ("majority of those guys" meaning the All-BIG guys and essential pieces). Out of Jacas, Scott, Davis - 2/3 and maybe 3/3 with Jacas as the wild card was always the likeliest outcome, but Bret's quotes don't move the table one bit.

Some are just way too inclined to suppose factuality and stand on it with little to no validation of merit.
Simple, true answer: he didn't. But people here love to pencil in assumptions, even with zero validation or justification. This is just another example, not that big a deal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back