I think the jump from a Big Ten coordinator to one of the lower tier ACC or Big 12 jobs is not entirely unrealistic. Brent Pry was DC at Penn St. before VT hired him. Tony Elliot was OC at Clemson. There are guys that make the jump, but it is typically guys who are coordinators at programs competing at the highest level (we are trying to get there but aren't yet). And yeah a lot of these guys don't succeed, but that's also skewed by the fact that the programs taking risks on first-time head coaches are doing so for a reason. You're never going to see Florida St. hire someone like this, because they are fishing in an entirely different talent pool.How realistic is it though to jump from coordinator to head coach of a power conference? Obviously we saw that with Ryan Walters, and the ultimate backlash on that was that he should’ve gotten head coaching experience at a smaller school first.
But more to the point, there are G5/G6 conferences that have more resources than the MAC. MAC may be the absolute worst of the G6 conferences. If I'm a Big Ten or SEC assistant wanting a head coaching gig I'm paying attention to openings in the AAC. Much better resources than the MAC. The new iteration of the PAC-12 may end up being close to that as well.
I think If I were Lunney and my goal was purely career progression I'd rank these various choices something like this:
1. P4 HC job (unlikely to get this but if you have the chance you jump at it)
2a. OC for storied and consistently relevant program (we're talking the Alabama/Georgia/OSU/Penn St. tier of program here, which would increase your chances at a job in category #1)
2b. HC for G6 program with resources and playoff ambitions
3. OC for Illinois
4. HC for lower tier G6 program (which would include MAC schools)
Last edited: