only helps with how UCLA has looked.I’d say the chances are pretty high he’s going to re-consider … Bret is all over this one …
Was a little bit of a shock we didn’t get him first go around …
only helps with how UCLA has looked.I’d say the chances are pretty high he’s going to re-consider … Bret is all over this one …
Was a little bit of a shock we didn’t get him first go around …
If thats the answer I'd rather Boyd win that job.As far as QB next year … Portal QB vs Boyd is what I expect the competition to be …
A very early name that I’ve heard could be portal bound …
![]()
Brock Glenn - Florida State Seminoles Quarterback - ESPN
View the profile of Florida State Seminoles Quarterback Brock Glenn on ESPN. Get the latest news, live stats and game highlights.www.espn.com
With his stats from 2024, he'll be super cheap.As far as QB next year … Portal QB vs Boyd is what I expect the competition to be …
A very early name that I’ve heard could be portal bound …
![]()
Brock Glenn - Florida State Seminoles Quarterback - ESPN
View the profile of Florida State Seminoles Quarterback Brock Glenn on ESPN. Get the latest news, live stats and game highlights.www.espn.com
I think he could easily be converted to WR as he has length and speed. IW made the transformation. We need to sell him on the best way to get to the NFL. It could be as a receiver.What position do you think he will play in college
Just a question for you. If we don’t start developing our QB recruits and continually go with portal guys, will that hurt our recruiting? I can’t fault the staff’s commitment to winning, just curious about your thoughts on this. Thanks.As far as QB next year … Portal QB vs Boyd is what I expect the competition to be …
A very early name that I’ve heard could be portal bound …
![]()
Brock Glenn - Florida State Seminoles Quarterback - ESPN
View the profile of Florida State Seminoles Quarterback Brock Glenn on ESPN. Get the latest news, live stats and game highlights.www.espn.com
I think with better receivers and a solid run game that he will have better numbers.With his stats from 2024, he'll be super cheap.
Just a question for you. If we don’t start developing our QB recruits and continually go with portal guys, will that hurt our recruiting? I can’t fault the staff’s commitment to winning, just curious about your thoughts on this. Thanks.
I have thought that myself since the last QB that succeeded as a recruit was Sheelhaase since Lunt was a transfer and Rivers/IW never developed. There are pros and cons to this way of recruiting. We would be getting someone with college experience as Peters, DeVito, Paddock, Sitkowski and now Altmyer and Hampton. The downside is that we would lose quality HS players to other schools. I hope Boyd pans out next year. I would like to see him get a chance unless a top level transfer comes in.Just a question for you. If we don’t start developing our QB recruits and continually go with portal guys, will that hurt our recruiting? I can’t fault the staff’s commitment to winning, just curious about your thoughts on this. Thanks.
I'm sure, almost impossible to be worse. This guy will require a 2026 Preston Stone NIL level of commitment, for a reason.I think with better receivers and a solid run game that he will have better numbers.
Just a question for you. If we don’t start developing our QB recruits and continually go with portal guys, will that hurt our recruiting? I can’t fault the staff’s commitment to winning, just curious about your thoughts on this. Thanks.
Obviously the staff is going to do what puts the team in a best position to succeed. In modern college football you can't do rebuilding years - other team's aren't going to so you're just going to lose momentum. I think the ideal scenario is that if you have questions about whether Boyd is ready, you bring in a senior QB to either take the reins for one year, or at least compete with Boyd for the starting spot. That puts you in a position to have Boyd (redshirt soph.), Clayton (redshirt fresh.), and Lopati (fresh.) compete for the starting gig in 2027 (hopefully at least one of them will be ready).I have thought that myself since the last QB that succeeded as a recruit was Sheelhaase since Lunt was a transfer and Rivers/IW never developed. There are pros and cons to this way of recruiting. We would be getting someone with college experience as Peters, DeVito, Paddock, Sitkowski and now Altmyer and Hampton. The downside is that we would lose quality HS players to other schools. I hope Boyd pans out next year. I would like to see him get a chance unless a top level transfer comes in.
Looks to me as of right now Bret has Hampton at #2 on the qb depth chart. He doesn't make decisions like that without a lot of forethought. Looked pretty sharp to me when he got in and he is the only qb on the team with a win over a strong playoff team. That can't be ignored.I'm expecting Petty to transfer out (Sun Belt, maybe AAC) to compete for a starting job and Newton will realize he needs to change positions to maximize his professional aspirations. That would change the QB room to Hampton (SR), Boyd (rFR), and Clayton (FR).
- Let's say the staff sees Hampton as the best option to navigate a transition year, with Boyd competing with him and hoping that Boyd takes over during the season. Even in that scenario, I still think the staff brings in someone with experience.
- Let's say the staff believes Boyd can be the starter so Hampton also transfers out. Now you have two freshmen QBs and nobody else. That would make it a priority that not only Illinois brings in an experienced QB, but someone that can at least compete for the starting job.
Logan is a beast, just shrugs off tackles. Really took it to ESL in CG's state championship win a couple years ago.Look at his Soph film. Judy a tough !!! kid that seems like he would fit the culture. Him, considine and Thies are guys that fit that mold.
![]()
Looks to me as of right now Bret has Hampton at #2 on the qb depth chart. He doesn't make decisions like that without a lot of forethought. Looked pretty sharp to me when he got in and he is the only qb on the team with a win over a strong playoff team. That can't be ignored.
name sounds familiar:
I think replacing top 50 QBs with a top 20 transfer is easily explainable, particularly if you're developing QBs and sending them to the league.Just a question for you. If we don’t start developing our QB recruits and continually go with portal guys, will that hurt our recruiting? I can’t fault the staff’s commitment to winning, just curious about your thoughts on this. Thanks.
Looks like PB.woowee, he has insane measurables: https://247sports.com/player/milan-parris-46141552/
the shark's going big game hunting