Sounds like Patterson may be the next portal entry.
The would require a CBA. In that direction, a CBA would almost certainly include multi year contracts.I never had a problem with NIL. I think players should make money, but NIL with unlimited transfers was a recipe for disaster.
Probably can’t be reversed and is an oversimplification, but I think keeping NIL but only allowing a player to transfer without sitting out would help.
Doesn't help that we gave up a kick return TD against TennesseeI am about done with the Robby Discher experiment.
Everyone is going to be throwing out unverifiable numbers…..To the person who said he was offered $750K. If that's true, lmao. Would put him just below NFL rookie minimum.
If this is true, he should already be gone!My opinion on this one is strictly my opinion …
But if it was me … A change would be made …
Going to need a new Kicker … TE room is not great … And missed on Sutter and Anderson … Which hey maybe we would have anyways but for both of them to say the relationship wasn’t that great with Discher … That’s an unacceptable answer for me …
But like I said … Strictly my opinion that a change should be made …
I’ve posted this before, but if Olano wins us just one game we wouldn’t have won, there is $$ value to the difference between 5-7 or 6-6 and 9-3 or 10-2 (and everywhere in between). I just keep watching kickers on CFP teams missing kicks that Olano would make. I fear we are undervaluing the position.To the person who said he was offered $750K. If that's true, lmao. Would put him just below NFL rookie minimum.
Agreed.Can any of the insiders or just people that have a better understanding of the roster help me understand what is going on at TE? Cole is clearly one of our best 1-2 TEs and while we landed the Vala, TE recruit that everyone seems to agree is underranked and has a ton of potential, we ultimately struck out on the 2 4 star TE in state prospects. Is our TE coach bad? Is this a scheme thing with how Lunney uses TEs in the offense? Or is there some other sort of explanation re: why can't we get/retain good TEs? Or am I simply overreacting and we are at where we should be at for a program of our caliber?
And it’s already started!So will Feagan be a TE next year? Seems to make more sense if he has aspirations of playing the NFL. Guess he could always play fullback but that is a dying position
So you prefer LB, correct? /sAnd it’s already started!
Agreed. It is a job at this point. Having multi-year contracts would cut down on the portal. Opt out clause if head coach leaves and I think there needs to be more stringent mechanisms in place to reduce the coaching carousel as well.I don’t understand why it’s taking so long to get there but with NIL and the portal we simply have to go all in with contracts and salary caps. If athletes are getting big money then the commitment has to go both ways including playing in bowl games. It’s a business right? Do you pay someone big money but give them the option to pick and choose when to perform? Why should we develop a player and have to financially compete to keep him each year. Sign a two year deal and we commit to you and you commit to us - just like the NFL. ITS THAT SIMPLE
Is that being snarkie or does it mean he is actually switching positionsAnd it’s already started!