illinidarrin
- from parts unknown
I hope we lock him up before he goes to Arkansas.Almost like that info was on here way before the national guys got it …![]()
I hope we lock him up before he goes to Arkansas.Almost like that info was on here way before the national guys got it …![]()
I sure hope someone’s got a tracker on Ryan Walters.Houser visiting tomorrow per 247. Definitely seems like priority A at QB.
Houser visiting tomorrow per 247. Definitely seems like priority A at QB.
I sure hope someone’s got a tracker on Ryan Walters.![]()
And I’ve acknowledged that you do have to take some smaller school guys because they are cheaper. However, which P4 dude do we know that is currently visiting?Its also impossible to build an entire roster out of P4 transfers because we just dont have the resources. Just like its generally not feasible to build a roster around only 5 stars. You need to take a shot at some of the lower level guys who can develop into the scheme.
The high school equivalent of your argument is that we dont have a high hit rate on 3 star players so we should stop recruiting them and only get 4 stars.
And I’ve acknowledged that you do have to take some smaller school guys because they are cheaper. However, which P4 dude do we know that is currently visiting?
My point is we’ve seem to prioritize a bunch of smaller school guys right off the bat. Which is the opposite of the strategy I think we should be taking. Get your horses first, and then see what kind of money you have left over to land your fliers.
I think you can take that approach but it’s a risk adverse one. It’s safe to play for the second and third tier guys. But then you get second and third tier results. This staff has earned the benefit of the doubt for sure… they’ve done well. But more so in the development area. I would argue they have not really hit on a juco commit in like 3 recruiting classes (Patterson was meh). Transfer juco guys they’ve had some success. And they’ve had some decent success with the smaller school guys for sure.if you lose out on your horses, your gonna be gleaning for scraps. best to have a balanced approach. ID your top targets well in advance and shoot your shot. ID staff has definitely earned the benefit of the doubt
I think you can take that approach but it’s a risk adverse one. It’s safe to play for the second and third tier guys. But then you get second and third tier results. This staff has earned the benefit of the doubt for sure… they’ve done well. But more so in the development area. I would argue they have not really hit on a juco commit in like 3 recruiting classes (Patterson was meh). Transfer juco guys they’ve had some success. And they’ve had some decent success with the smaller school guys for sure.
However, it feels like sometimes we get sorta cute. Not saying the sky is falling. But I simply don’t see how recruiting a bad offensive lineman from lower levels for depth purposes moves the needle at all.
wait, what?Almost like that info was on here way before the national guys got it …![]()
I think giving a scholarship to a guy who wasn’t even good at the lower level… for depth purposes… right off the bat.. is in fact wasting recruiting capital. Especially in a season where we desperately need to overhaul an entire roster. Is landing a potential back up guard really worth it this early?am not suggesting that we shouldn't pursue select big dogs. we absolutely should. but at the same time we should be actively pursuing guys at or near the top of our board who happen to play in a lower tier.
one more thought on big dogs: gotta accurately assess that we have a legit shot. don't waste recruiting capital on guys who are unlikely gets
I think giving a scholarship to a guy who wasn’t even good at the lower level… for depth purposes… right off the bat.. is in fact wasting recruiting capital. Especially in a season where we desperately need to overhaul an entire roster. Is landing a potential back up guard really worth it this early?
I totally trust the staff. But sometimes I think we get overconfident in our development. I’d argue not landing portal DBs and LBs killed us the two seasons more than anything else.
Rosiek is a seniorWho are our returning starters on defense? Is this it?
Rosiek
Heckel
Clark
Resetich
Tomiwa
We have like 20 guys transferring out of the program. I don’t think they are banking on player development anymore
I think giving a scholarship to a guy who wasn’t even good at the lower level… for depth purposes… right off the bat.. is in fact wasting recruiting capital. Especially in a season where we desperately need to overhaul an entire roster. Is landing a potential back up guard really worth it this early?
I totally trust the staff. But sometimes I think we get overconfident in our development. I’d argue not landing portal DBs and LBs killed us the two seasons more than anything else.
That OL from Colorado state or whatever. That move does absolutely nothing. 55 PFF grade in a bad conference… yet we want him? It’s concerning to me. But hey, I’ve been wrong before lolso do I (and presumably everyone else). who's the loser we offered?
unfortunately according to my excel sheet (very official I know) lol. We don’t have nearly that many spots open. I think we have anywhere from 10-12 spots as we sit right now. 105 being the limit. Given that 2 of those spots have to go to a QB and K. We are realistically looking at 10 guys ish for both the offensive and defensive side of the ball. (Unless more transfer which I’m sure will happen).We have like 20 guys transferring out of the program. I don’t think they are banking on player development anymore