Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

#326      
ChiefGritty
AirTran said:
Then how do you explain the 2025 and 2026 recruiting classes and the 2024 and 2025 transfers?
Click to expand...
Simeon Rice said:
Define red flags. '27 is one of the deepest in-state classes in years, if not decades, and we almost assuredly won't touch the top 10 and barely register for the next 10-25.
Click to expand...
In 2026, mere months ago, we signed 2 of the top 8 and 5 of the top 18 in-state players, in what was overall a class worthy of Prime Zook, a huge breakthrough.

Losing Lopati has been inevitable for a long time even within that context, that doesn't concern me at all. But it is tough to square that monster class we just signed with the sense of financial and strategic momentum stalling since then.

Maybe the bar is just raising so fast nationally that we're getting dragged underneath it? Maybe we're just pushing Hauck anxiety onto recruiting? Hard to say.
 
#327      
mhuml32
Simeon Rice said:
Define red flags. '27 is one of the deepest in-state classes in years, if not decades, and we almost assuredly won't touch the top 10 and barely register for the next 10-25. Our neighbor rivals have far more momentum in our own state. And this in an era when you don't need years of overperformance on the field. Instead, you need a little bit of a pitch and a bunch of NIL.
Click to expand...

Another red flag is this class is supposed to be small, meaning you had advantages of (a) spending more on each recruit because of class size, (b) spending more time on a smaller target of players, (c) taking less players in a loaded in-state class meant you could swallow more risk than previous years.

JucoIllini10 said:
Red flags would be missing out on targets to programs with similar NIL funds. Illinois simply cannot compete dollar for dollar with Michigan, Ohio State, ND, Mizzou, Miami, etc. I'll start getting concerned if recruits the staff is prioritizing start committing to other mid-tier Power4 programs. Thies would be the only current in-state prospect that fits that description which I mentioned in my original post. Halliman, Fifer, TJ Lewis, and Injaychock are much better indicators of in-state recruiting success compared to panicking when guys like Park and Wagner end up committing to historically better programs with bigger NIL budgets.
Click to expand...

There are targets and offers being made to players that Illinois wants that are landing at the Iowa's of the world. It's also a messy business to define who's a A-list target because every program, including Illinois, will spin a loss as just wanting another player more instead, and finding the truth is impossible. Plus, some of Illinois' best recruiting wins last year were players that had offers from schools you mentioned. That's how the program can elevate. Constantly being at a talent disadvantage is one heck of a burden.
 
#328      
Simeon Rice
ChiefGritty said:
In 2026, mere months ago, we signed 2 of the top 8 and 5 of the top 18 in-state players, in what was overall a class worthy of Prime Zook, a huge breakthrough.

Losing Lopati has been inevitable for a long time even within that context, that doesn't concern me at all. But it is tough to square that monster class we just signed with the sense of financial and strategic momentum stalling since then.

Maybe the bar is just raising so fast nationally that we're getting dragged underneath it? Maybe we're just pushing Hauck anxiety onto recruiting? Hard to say.
Click to expand...

This is where I am at as well. Losing Lopati, while disappointing, isn't that big of a deal. The bigger deal is what happened (is happening) since the last phenomenal prep class. In that class, it was big on quantity (great point by @mhuml32 about spreading cash in the prior post), and big on quality (several in-state top 10ers).

Since then, we had the January portal season, which while it may provide some interesting pieces, it was clear we were not in the convo for most top talent and lost a bunch of marginal dudes that presumably we didn't pony up for. Plus, didn't retain as many as we'd like. Now, for this prep class, we're off to a slow start, and doesn't seem to be much path to change that.
 
#329      
ChiefGritty
Simeon Rice said:
This is where I am at as well. Losing Lopati, while disappointing, isn't that big of a deal. The bigger deal is what happened (is happening) since the last phenomenal prep class. In that class, it was big on quantity (great point by @mhuml32 about spreading cash in the prior post), and big on quality (several in-state top 10ers).

Since then, we had the January portal season, which while it may provide some interesting pieces, it was clear we were not in the convo for most top talent and lost a bunch of marginal dudes that presumably we didn't pony up for. Plus, didn't retain as many as we'd like. Now, for this prep class, we're off to a slow start, and doesn't seem to be much path to change that.
Click to expand...
It's a little like Purdue Basketball, where our strategy for the portal NIL era has essentially been very carefully and intelligently keeping the Before Times alive within our building.

Purdue Basketball is dead-ender-ing that strategy by promoting their whole bench next year, which is cool and we'll see where it goes, but we have pivoted, and it feels like we've slammed into the wall of reality a little bit as a consequence.
 
#330      
mhuml32
I view the Lopati loss as a bigger deal than some because it was evidence of a different path. I was raising concern a couple months ago that the 2027 recruiting was trending poorly. That said, the staff could argue they spent big on getting the absolute best prep QB they could after they brought in their best recruiting class in 2026. That makes sense to me, and I get spending big on the most expensive asset on the transfer portal, and raising the potential ceiling of what type of QB is playing in Champaign. Now? The worst of both worlds is increasingly likely where Lopati very much seems destined elsewhere and the rest of the recruiting class is lagging behind previous years. This all might correct itself with Illinois freeing up large funds from Lopati de-committing and Bielema & staff can seriously re-engage with top in-state prospects, but that's TBD right now.
 
#332      
Simeon Rice
Interesting relevant example. Don't know any of the details aside from what's on the 247 page, but in-state DL/Edge Keysan Taylor (a top 400, 4* composite from Rockford) just received a CB to Ole Miss. Vandy (visit), IU (visit), ASU, Cincy also listed as destinations under consideration. Looks like we offered at some point, but no visit date. There may be a whole backstory on this one, but it's more interesting that for a majority of the top 20 in-state kids, we barely even register in the discussions. In the matter of 4 months, we seem to have gone from Peak Zook Era to End Zook Era
 
#334      
JucoIllini10
mhuml32 said:
There are targets and offers being made to players that Illinois wants that are landing at the Iowa's of the world. It's also a messy business to define who's a A-list target because every program, including Illinois, will spin a loss as just wanting another player more instead, and finding the truth is impossible. Plus, some of Illinois' best recruiting wins last year were players that had offers from schools you mentioned. That's how the program can elevate. Constantly being at a talent disadvantage is one heck of a burden.
Click to expand...
I agree with this (I didn't agree last class when some on this board tried to "spin" that Riordan was not a priority O-line target when he committed to Iowa) but I'm wondering specifically for the class of 27 who are all these recruits everyone is upset that Illinois missed on? Looking at the class of 27 offers, there are very few serious targets that have committed elsewhere... the QBs, missed out on top TE target, and missed some safety recruits. This is not a great start but the timeline for this group of targets seems pushed back compared to previous years.
 
#346      
Mr. Tibbs
therealmiket86 said:
lol how many kids from York have we missed out on? Only one I can think of is Joe Rieff

just like Karner and Hulak are the only 2 from ic we have lost out on.
Click to expand...
I dunno

those schools have had some decent guys over the years and we NEVER even get a sniff

kinda like Naz , and Driscoll back in the day
 
#348      
Ramrod2010
Honest question, how much of our reactions right now are still tied to an old mindset?

I won't disagree that it feels disappointing, just trying to look at this as a bigger picture in the hopes that we are being a little short-sighted.
 
#349      
redwingillini11
Losing Lopati to Michigan is one thing. But I worry what was suggested that there’s less football money with more going to basketball. Obviously I want us putting together top 5 in the country basketball rosters. But I don’t want us to cede an inch in football. We are in a good spot in the Big Ten right now. Don’t want to give anyone else the opportunity to leapfrog us a push us back down to the bottom half or worse.
 
#350      
therealmiket86
Mr. Tibbs said:
I dunno

those schools have had some decent guys over the years and we NEVER even get a sniff

kinda like Naz , and Driscoll back in the day
Click to expand...


Rieff was their first p4 recruit in probably 30 years. Until recently York was a bad program

The 2 kids I mentioned with ic we offered and didn’t get. On the flip side KJ Parker camped at Illinois and we never offered. Now he’s at Iowa. 2027 recruit Josh Shaw and a couple P4 offers and no Illini offer

Driscoll was a good small school program but they didn’t produce p4 players.

Naz is a better example and a school we have never gotten a player from.

On the flip side look at a school like Montini. They’ve produced a lot of talent lately and we haven’t recruited their guys at all.

Our recruiting in the western suburbs in general has been historically bad. I know the coaches at these programs and they aren’t pushing kids from coming to Illinois. But if you’re only showing up to recruiting the kids the blue bloods are after it’ll be an uphill battle.
 
Back