Illinois Football Uniforms

Status
Not open for further replies.
#51      

SuperMetroid

Evanston
The old Illini uniforms are in the past for a reason. Let’s leave them there.
Agreed. I have nostalgia for the older unis of course, but I think the last two sets since the rebrand are the best we’ve ever had. The Zook era is the Nike pointless side panel template look at it’s most generic, and the 80’s jerseys look like Wal-mart knockoffs now. The Tepper/Turner unis still look OK, but the slant ILLINOIS logo should be placed in a rocket and fired into the sun.
 
#53      
All navy blue on the road. Orange and Gray secondary colors.
All gray at home with navy and orange secondaries.
University of Illinois Galloping Ghosts.
 
#54      
...or Fighting Ghosts, or just Ghosts.
 
#55      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
Lovie didn’t like it
Neither does Underwood and neither does Whitman.

From day 1 of the rebrand, the block I and the Shield were pitted against one another as a backward-looking coded option and a forward-looking coded option. Not to mention the whole Mike Thomas factor.

The Shield is the aesthetically and functionally superior option, as it has always been, but by this point the war has probably been lost
 
#56      
Of course we still do have white facemasks, just on our white helmets in our frequent white-out road look, the absolute worst uniform trend in college football.

I really do think the 2001-era uniforms are the best we've done though. There was a crispness to the whole package that we haven't ever matched.
image_handler.aspx

quarterback-kurt-kittner-of-illinois-signals-the-play-against-penn-picture-id838317


And there is a lesson in us making some very subtle changes in 2004-ish, and ending up with a much lesser overall product

Hayden3-640w.jpg


As I said before, they aren't wearing the same equipment, so it can't all be exactly the same, and I'm no devotee of slant Illinois, but if I'm looking to draw visual inspiration for what we should do, 2001 is where I'm going. That it's our last Big Ten championship team (and of course the era our AD played) makes it that much more natural.
I like those uniforms (Kurt Kittner era) but with the oversized numbers from the Tepper era. I also wouldn't mind having a defense that was as good as the Lou Tepper days.
I liked the helmets from a few years ago that had the outline of the state of Illinois on them. Those had real potential.
 
#58      

Deleted member 747671

D
Guest
Of course we still do have white facemasks, just on our white helmets in our frequent white-out road look, the absolute worst uniform trend in college football.

I really do think the 2001-era uniforms are the best we've done though. There was a crispness to the whole package that we haven't ever matched.
image_handler.aspx

quarterback-kurt-kittner-of-illinois-signals-the-play-against-penn-picture-id838317


And there is a lesson in us making some very subtle changes in 2004-ish, and ending up with a much lesser overall product

Hayden3-640w.jpg


As I said before, they aren't wearing the same equipment, so it can't all be exactly the same, and I'm no devotee of slant Illinois, but if I'm looking to draw visual inspiration for what we should do, 2001 is where I'm going. That it's our last Big Ten championship team (and of course the era our AD played) makes it that much more natural.
Take the 2001 style. Update to the current number font. Replace the slant Illinois with the shield and we’re golden. Done
 
#59      
Of course we still do have white facemasks, just on our white helmets in our frequent white-out road look, the absolute worst uniform trend in college football.

I really do think the 2001-era uniforms are the best we've done though. There was a crispness to the whole package that we haven't ever matched.
image_handler.aspx

quarterback-kurt-kittner-of-illinois-signals-the-play-against-penn-picture-id838317


And there is a lesson in us making some very subtle changes in 2004-ish, and ending up with a much lesser overall product

Hayden3-640w.jpg


As I said before, they aren't wearing the same equipment, so it can't all be exactly the same, and I'm no devotee of slant Illinois, but if I'm looking to draw visual inspiration for what we should do, 2001 is where I'm going. That it's our last Big Ten championship team (and of course the era our AD played) makes it that much more natural.
These are cool jerseys, but kind of basic. I like the Beckman jerseys.

Side note: Seeing Lloyd's name on jersey reminds me of my younger days in middle school going to my first football game where Brandon Lloyd came out of the tunnel waving his arms and pumping the crowd up. It was amazing and I was instantly a fan. I actually didn't know much about individuals on the team at the time, and I was thrilled that this guy that I instantly noticed was also a stud.
 
#60      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
The Zook era is the Nike pointless side panel template look at it’s most generic
True, but it still suited our color scheme and looked good on us.

juice_juice_medium.jpg


And I also thought those were the best orange unis we've ever had:

illini-football-fbiowa-314.jpg


It seems pretty clear looking through this stuff that we're barking up the wrong tree with the white-phobia of our current uni set. For one thing, we're almost exactly copying Michigan, just replacing maize with orange, except we don't have Michigan's timeless icon of college football of a helmet design, which is the centerpiece of their whole look.
Michigan_Wolverines_team_sideline_2016_23.jpg

B2_TatiColumn-900x600.jpg


And the other theoretical problem is, on an actual real-life football team, there are going to be accents of white all over the place. Towels, tape, socks, mouthguards, chinstrap padding, complementary colors on gloves and shoes, etc etc etc. So rather than try to avoid white as just a too-clever-by-half schtick, as in our pointless brand-violating orange Block I border against an orange helmet, let the white work with the overall package to create something that looks good.
 
Last edited:
#61      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
At some point in the next couple of years we'll get new uniforms pursuant to our Nike deal. But let's assume we're stuck with what we've got for the time being. I think my concept for working with what we've got would be:

1. Above all else, get a proper Block I decal with a white border, and align it properly!
2. Swap the white facemasks and chinstraps on the white helmets with the blue ones on the orange helmets
3. Get a helmet stripe decal, which creates a sense of proportion and balance to the whole thing.
4. Wear the white pants with the home orange helmets and blue jerseys, and with the usual orange home gloves, shoes, etc.

That would align pretty closely with the concept Will-ini posted in the original version of this thread, and with the caveat that you were warned about my terrible artistic skills, would look something like this:

5be0e1f98ad07.image.jpg


I don't love white pants in general and I don't really think that's what we should do going forward, but the current orange pants with no striping or accents at all really look terrible, especially on the bigger guys. Plus with no white at all in the jersey it just makes for a muddy, unbalanced look overall.

I think this is about the best we can do with what we've got, and points the way to a future that looks more in keeping with the Turner/Zook past.
 
Last edited:
#62      
I actually liked the original rebrand from the Beckham era. There are some changes I’d like to see on them but generally I liked them. I would want white face masks on the orange helmet. Replace the block I with the shield on the helmet and I think it would look sharp and fit a helmet much better than the I. I would’ve liked to see the pants striping extend the entire length of the pants and match the helmet striping pattern as well.
Most people that I know here in the South and, in parts of the Midwest, don't even know that the shield is a shield. I was asked all of the time what that particular image was.
 
#63      
Lovies gone......here's a mock up my brother designed. It combines the 'I' with the illini script. Either this or use the 'I' logo with the circle around it that Rod Smith wore on his sweatshirts. Both would look good. The problem with our ''I logo is it just too tall. Shrink the I like Miamis 'U' logo and it's good.
 

Attachments

  • IMG958293.jpg
    IMG958293.jpg
    176.5 KB · Views: 296
  • IMG958293.jpg
    IMG958293.jpg
    176.5 KB · Views: 282
#65      
Lovies gone......here's a mock up my brother designed. It combines the 'I' with the illini script. Either this or use the 'I' logo with the circle around it that Rod Smith wore on his sweatshirts. Both would look good. The problem with our ''I logo is it just too tall. Shrink the I like Miamis 'U' logo and it's good.
I’d settle for a QB that throws off of the correct foot 😜
 
#67      

Deleted member 654622

D
Guest
If you’re looking for any artistic ability at all, you’ve come to the wrong place.

Hot takes are my medium.
I am one that likes the idea of pushing the military aspect of Fighting Illini. I do not know the origins of these helmets but made me wonder if they could develop an aesthetic helmet design with a list of the fallen soldiers that the columns actually memorialize.
1609091258852.png
 
#69      
Lovies gone......here's a mock up my brother designed. It combines the 'I' with the illini script. Either this or use the 'I' logo with the circle around it that Rod Smith wore on his sweatshirts. Both would look good. The problem with our ''I logo is it just too tall. Shrink the I like Miamis 'U' logo and it's good.
Here are some more mock ups
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8460.jpg
    IMG_8460.jpg
    227.3 KB · Views: 245
  • IMG_8458.jpg
    IMG_8458.jpg
    177.4 KB · Views: 234
#70      
Most people that I know here in the South and, in parts of the Midwest, don't even know that the shield is a shield. I was asked all of the time what that particular image was.
If you have to explain what it is I'm thinking it's not a good image.
 
#72      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
Didn't realize how similar these two were.

Still, besides the stars issue, that uniform is also a historically incorrect mashup of the home jersey and road pants of the Butkus era.

920x920.jpg

4aa024037afc01a3cff452cc2daffb63.png


But it's certainly a lesson in not being afraid of some white. And also that simplicity is a virtue. Keep in mind, simplicity is not the same thing as "traditional", sometimes uniforms that are explicitly backward looking to cater to cranky old guy fans still nonetheless have too much going on visually:

6R6U7PMCWBHXNJBRYXAJ3PR3IY.jpg


One last stray observation, contrasting collars tend to look a lot better on the jersey as a fan-worn item than on an actual football uniform.
 
#73      
Didn't realize how similar these two were.

Still, besides the stars issue, that uniform is also a historically incorrect mashup of the home jersey and road pants of the Butkus era.

920x920.jpg

4aa024037afc01a3cff452cc2daffb63.png


But it's certainly a lesson in not being afraid of some white. And also that simplicity is a virtue. Keep in mind, simplicity is not the same thing as "traditional", sometimes uniforms that are explicitly backward looking to cater to cranky old guy fans still nonetheless have too much going on visually:

6R6U7PMCWBHXNJBRYXAJ3PR3IY.jpg


One last stray observation, contrasting collars tend to look a lot better on the jersey as a fan-worn item than on an actual football uniform.
Not a big fan of the stars but, I love this uni. I wouldn't mind if they just had the numbers on the side of the helmets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.