I think that ship has sailed.
Ship of Fools?
I think that ship has sailed.
Ok we talk about making bets on here all the time. I am so sure on JT that I am willing to bet 1 year of not posting on here
If he doesn't sign and join the illini I will not post from the day he signs else where for 1 year. Any of you no way JT is an Illini willing to do the same when he does ?
Off the subject, but all of Ayo's CB's are for UI. Not too early too sign.
Off the subject, but all of Ayo's CB's are for UI. Not too early too sign.
Come on, Ga65. We're debating grammar here. =)
Has Badocchi made any comment about when he'll be committing?
Come on, Ga65. We're debating grammar here. =)
Thanks for the sacrifice coach!
I mean, if you are going to internet bet, shouldn't you wager one of your 3 beach houses, your Ferrari, Bentley, and your private island in the South Pacific?
That's dangerous. I already owe S&C 500,000,000 internet points... I think. The hat was technically in a bag, not sitting on the table. We need an impartial judge.
My bad, but my wife is an English PH.D. Get enough corrections.
Although the hat was in the bag, the bag was sitting on the table! Therefore the hat was sitting on the table.
That's dangerous. I already owe S&C 500,000,000 internet points... I think. The hat was technically in a bag, not sitting on the table. We need an impartial judge.
Well you could ask, WAS the hat truly in the bag? yes we saw a bag on the table with what looked like a hat inside it, BUT no one saw the hat in the bag nor him take the hat out of the bag. So the hat was never on the table as there is no 100% proof to it.
Well you could ask, WAS the hat truly in the bag? yes we saw a bag on the table with what looked like a hat inside it, BUT no one saw the hat in the bag nor him take the hat out of the bag. It only looked as if he took the hat from there. So the hat was never on the table as there is no 100% proof to it.
Schrödinger's hat
Since I started the dialogue that prompted your bet (I said I did not expect MS to make a "spectacle of things" during his ceremony -- instead, just a no-nonsense announcement), I tend to think he did just that.That's dangerous. I already owe S&C 500,000,000 internet points... I think. The hat was technically in a bag, not sitting on the table. We need an impartial judge.
Since I started the dialogue that prompted your bet (I said I did not expect MS to make a "spectacle of things" during his ceremony -- instead, just a no-nonsense announcement), I tend to think he did just that.
He didn't place multiple hats on the table; he didn't wear layers and layers of school shirts; and he didn't try to pull a CLIFF. Hence, I think he really did play it cool. No games. Just a mature, legitimate announcement to all interested parties.
I don't know. Everyone has their own peeves. The one that really bothers me is when people write "would of". This happens very frequently on here.
By the way, "would've" is a contraction for "would have". The phrase "would of" does not make any sense whatsoever.
That is all.
That's sort of what I figured, but I wanted to be sure before I concede those hard-earned internet points to S&C. I'll spend years paying this off...