And for the heck of it, here's how many top-100 kids we've had in previous seasons. This doesn't factor in kids who were either redshirting or sitting out for transfer, but rather, just captures the total # of top-100 kids on the roster. It's obviously an imperfect measure of talent, but it's something:
2018: 4
2017: 6
2016: 7
2015: 6
2014: 5
2013: 6
2012: 8
2011: 6
2010: 5
2009: 4
2008: 7
2007: 7
2006: 7
2005: 10
2004: 10
2003: 8
2002: 5
2001: 5
A few observations.
This team is the least talented team this century, purely according to how many kids we have in the top-100.
The 2001 and 2002 teams had among the least # of top-100 kids, BUT......they also had several 5* kids (Frank, Cook, Marcus Griffin) and a TON of experienced kids like Bradford, Damir, Lucas Johnson, Arch, etc. Experience and size/toughness matters -- especially when blended with an elite 5* PG and a 5* PF.
The 2009 team was among the least talented, but was also very experienced. Senior guards in Trent Meacham and Chet Frazier to go along with experience and size in the front court in Davis and Tisdale.
2004-2005 was crazy talented, and it showed. Talent matters. All 5 starters were top-100 kids. 2012 was a team with a lot of talent, but clearly didn't perform. Then again, some of that top-100 talent turned out to be a total bust: Mike Shaw, Myke Henry, etc.
2018 suffers from the worst combination of talent and experience this century.
This is an epic post. Mind-blowing and really illustrates how talent translates to success on the court