Let me know when you perfect the formula for predicting which of said lower rated recruits will contribute over a 4 year period.
A lot of programs have done it in the past (Wisconsin, Butler, Gonzaga, etc.). It's not as easy to sustain success with as it is for the Blue Bloods, but the formula is putting together kids that have the ability and fire to compete and know how to win. Once a program proves they know how to win and established that identity, then opportunities to attract high talent more consistently becomes easier. Just my opinion.