Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,276      

derrick6

Illini Dawg
Seattle
I don’t want to lose ColeHawk….this would be his team next year if Kofi leaves…..this is a role he would shine in. He is his best when he is relied on or needed….his defense is top notch! It would be devastating to see him wear any other jersey!
CoHawk would be best fit at center and I believe he expressed that he likes that position.

If Kofi leaves, probably best for keeping CoHawk (ignoring Nye’s transfer impact).
 
#1,277      

altgeld88

Arlington, Virginia
Would expect Texas TECH to have some decent admission requirements
It's the number 1 choice in Texas for students who couldn't get into UT or TAMU.
~ 25 years ago I was working on a project involving a chemical plant in Beaumont, TX. The senior chemicals guy there was probably the age I am now, a soft-spoken West Texan of few words. We were chatting over BBQ at lunch one day and I asked him where he studied chemical engineering. Turned out it was Texas Tech, and that he had grown up in Lubbock. I knew nothing about Lubbock except that it was up in the part near the OK panhandle, and that it was flat, dry and dusty.

"So what is there in Lubbock besides Texas Tech," I asked.

"The horizon," he replied without missing a beat or stopping to think about it. Still cracks me up all these years later.
 
#1,278      
Sacraig's points are spot on. Bash beat me to it as well. Just posted this a minute later.

While athletics doesn't have impact on academic reputation, it most certainly drives school popularity. Anyone want to bet St.Peters sees an uptick in applications and enrollment this year? Yep, that school will see some better revenue there as well as NCAA certified swag revenue!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomvan...ryone-wants-to-go-to-alabama/?sh=1555e2b5393a

To your point
 
#1,281      

sacraig

The desert
Could result in academic reputation going down.
first dates wtf GIF by COCO Television


There are 56,000+ students at the a University of Illinois. Admitting a few or even a few dozen athletes who would struggle to get in otherwise will absolutely not lower the academic reputation.
 
#1,282      
first dates wtf GIF by COCO Television


There are 56,000+ students at the a University of Illinois. Admitting a few or even a few dozen athletes who would struggle to get in otherwise will absolutely not lower the academic reputation.
To be fair, the few dozen that get admitted that struggle are also the ones talking to the media representing the school, so this 100% could impact it.

Not sure what New Mexico State is like academically, but the guy that lead them to an upset did a post game interview and made me think their school is not strong academically. Just one man’s opinion though.
 
#1,283      

sacraig

The desert
I might tend to disagree with this....to at least a small extent. I've now been in the South for 10 years, sending all three boys to/through Clemson.

And while I have no data at my fingertips, the overall admissions standards over that time frame (for Engineering, in particular) have stiffened geometrically.

Counselors at our HS attribute it to the "new-found" national name recognition --- the result of the football team's two Natty's and 6 consecutive trips to the National semi-finals. (Of course, the climate doesn't hurt much either...........but then again it's always been here.)

NOT SURE THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE TO REALLY EXPLAIN IT.


View attachment 16715
Exactly. If you have higher visibility you get more applications for the same number of spots, which increases selectivity. That tends to bolster academic programs, though it's not a perfect relationship.
 
Last edited:
#1,284      

derrick6

Illini Dawg
Seattle
first dates wtf GIF by COCO Television


There are 56,000+ students at the a University of Illinois. Admitting a few or even a few dozen athletes who would struggle to get in otherwise will absolutely not lower the academic reputation.
That wasn’t the implication of your post. You suggest getting more people to apply based on athletic success, right? That is what I responded too.

On a similar thought, I agree we should let athletes in with exceptions. Unfortunately it would need to apply to the general population, which “could” negatively impact the reputation.
 
#1,285      

sacraig

The desert
That wasn’t the implication of your post. You suggest getting more people to apply based on athletic success, right? That is what I responded too.

On a similar thought, I agree we should let athletes in with exceptions. Unfortunately it would need to apply to the general population, which “could” negatively impact the reputation.
If more people apply for the same number of open slots, admissions become more selective and the average admitted student scores go up. That improves reputation. Selectivity is also a variable in the US News university rankings.
 
#1,286      
I might tend to disagree with this....to at least a small extent. I've now been in the South for 10 years, sending all three boys to/through Clemson.

And while I have no data at my fingertips, the overall admissions standards over that time frame (for Engineering, in particular) have stiffened geometrically.

Counselors at our HS attribute it to the "new-found" national name recognition --- the result of the football team's two Natty's and 6 consecutive trips to the National semi-finals. (Of course, the climate doesn't hurt much either...........but then again it's always been here.)

NOT SURE THERE'S ANYTHING ELSE TO REALLY EXPLAIN IT.


View attachment 16715
Clemson was a very good academic school when I was looking at colleges 10-15 years ago. Don’t know that it’s truly tightened - it’s also been a solid engineering and business school.
 
#1,287      

IlliniKat91

Chicago, IL
To be fair, the few dozen that get admitted that struggle are also the ones talking to the media representing the school, so this 100% could impact it.

Not sure what New Mexico State is like academically, but the guy that lead them to an upset did a post game interview and made me think their school is not strong academically. Just one man’s opinion though.
Public speaking skills start in elementary school and are strongly influenced by culture and one's first language. There's also formal English, but no official "standard" for it. How someone speaks is not a good indication of how intelligent they are. (Nerves get in the way, etc.)

Just something to keep in mind.
 
Last edited:
#1,290      

lstewart53x3

Scottsdale, Arizona
I respectfully disagree. Basketball is not an academic pursuit.
Agree to disagree.

In my mind, institutions of higher learning exist to reward and cultivate excellence.

Academics are a major piece of that.

But human beings are so much more than that. They have the ability to create excellence in all sorts of different areas that are just as valuable as academics and deserve to be cultivated in the same way.

These basketball players commit their life to the game. Many aren’t afforded the same privileges growing up as some who are more gifted/nurtured academically. Basketball is their chance to give their family a better life and they’re amazing it + they provide hope & joy to many of alumni.

That’s *valuable*.
 
#1,291      

sacraig

The desert
To be fair, the few dozen that get admitted that struggle are also the ones talking to the media representing the school, so this 100% could impact it.

Not sure what New Mexico State is like academically, but the guy that lead them to an upset did a post game interview and made me think their school is not strong academically. Just one man’s opinion though.
NMSU is actually a pretty strong school. They dona good job serving a large underserved population who weren't afforded lots of opportunities like public speaking. Yet their graduates are pretty high quality in general.
 
#1,292      
Public speaking skills start in elementary school and are strongly influenced by culture and one's first language. There's also formal English, but no official "standard" for it. How someone speaks is in not a good indication of how intelligent they are. (Nerves get in the way, etc.)

Just something to keep in mind.
I 100% understand, but I was speaking to perception and what people watching see and how it might negatively influence the schools academic reputation to have someone who does not meet those standards as the face of the university.
 
#1,293      

altgeld88

Arlington, Virginia
The ubiquity of sports media, and increasing wealth, has really driven this trend. When I was in school in the '80s you didn't see this sort of regional migration to football schools. The Univ of Florida, for instance, was fairly mediocre and didn't have a lot of out-of-state students. The exposure form football has helped it become academically fairly strong in recent years. And a school such as Wisconsin, always strong academically, has been able to attract even better-qualified out-of-staters over the years because of the consistent excellence and national profile of football and hoops since the '90s. As the article notes, that a lot of incremental $$ for the unis given the cost of out-of-state tuition.

When I was at UIUC out-of-state undergrads made up only 3% of the class. Anecdote: a guy down the hall was from South Florida. Smart guy. Literally chose Illinois because of Lou Henson's teams.
 
#1,295      

derrick6

Illini Dawg
Seattle
If more people apply for the same number of open slots, admissions become more selective and the average admitted student scores go up. That improves reputation. Selectivity is also a variable in the US News university rankings.
Possibly, but possibly the way you attracted the applicants could be biased. That bias could be negative or positive.

Just saying, not speaking in absolutes.
 
#1,296      

sacraig

The desert
I 100% understand, but I was speaking to perception and what people watching see and how it might negatively influence the schools academic reputation to have someone who does not meet those standards as the face of the university.
It could also make the school appealing to prospective students who see people who talk and look like them representing the school. I seriously doubt it moves the needle on overall academic reputation.
 
#1,297      
My read on the situation is that athletics can help a school in a marketing kind of way. Gets the name out there in a big way. This helps get application numbers up. So the miniscule concession in academic standards to a handful of students is worth the gains, which are probably relatively minor for a school that serves as the flagship public institution of their state, like Illinois (for schools like Clemson, Gonzaga, Villanova I think the publicity can actually be a much bigger deal). So in summation, it has an effect, but not a huge one, in most cases. After all, Northwestern has the best academic reputation in the Big Ten, and they certainly don't have athletic success to thank for it.
 
#1,298      

IlliniKat91

Chicago, IL
I 100% understand, but I was speaking to perception and what people watching see and how it might negatively influence the schools academic reputation to have someone who does not meet those standards as the face of the university.
Then it goes back to what we were saying earlier. People don't think athletes need to get good grades and will attribute it to that, not the school.

For example, I was watching an interview Ayo gave with an older relative. He misspoke and the first joke they made was about the quality of CPS. 🤷🏼‍♀️ They never thought to comment on Illinois.
 
#1,299      

sacraig

The desert
Possibly, but possibly the way you attracted the applicants could be biased. That bias could be negative or positive.

Just saying, not speaking in absolutes.
This doesn't match the facts on the ground. Schools with sustained athletic success see influxes of applicants that tend to increase overall selectivity. Someone earlier posted a link to an article about it, actually. All of the extra out of state students bring more cash to academic programs as well, which let's the school invest in more faculty and new facilities, which have a direct positive impact on education.
 
#1,300      
NMSU is actually a pretty strong school. They dona good job serving a large underserved population who weren't afforded lots of opportunities like public speaking. Yet their graduates are pretty high quality in general.
26% graduation rate begs to challenge that, though it’s not HORRIBLE, ranked around 227 among national universities. It may be a very positive impact of a school, but pretty strong seems to be a tad much.

I’m not suggesting anyone graduating from there is not of high quality - to be fair, I’ve not actually met anyone that graduated from there, but from an academic reputation standpoint, I think they would fall more along the lines of “decent”.

For comparison purposes, Alabama is ranked 148th, so just shy of 80 spots ahead of NMSU.

Again, not saying it’s a bad school, just that it doesn’t exactly have the reputation academically of being a strong academic school.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.