Ah the internet, whose binary nature seems to prevent users ability to accept that 2 facts can be true at the same time. Recent examples:
Epps had decent success, has even more potential, and will likely develop into a very nice player (Why we're pissed he didn't work out here)
and
Epps was put in a bad position as a Fr, wasn't up to the task defensively (which is why he got schooled a lot at that end), and turned out to not be as coachable as needed (Why coach didn't see his $ demands lining up with his value)
or
DGL is an exciting player who is motivated to prove the doubters wrong by earning court time (Why we recruited him)
and
DGL is undersized (bulk) to play D in this league and hasn't had to play much D (did his league this year even play D?) who will be playing for a coach who has just watched 2 Fr PGs flame out by being pushed into the fire before they were ready (He's not going to watch that movie a 3rd time)
