Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#477      
Overall, they want:
A lead pg
A 2/3 that has some versatility (Maddox, Hill, Oweh, etc)
Storr
Stretch 4 if Coleman is gone
5 man no matter what
I’m liking this plan

Sacha Baron Cohen Thumbs Up GIF by Amazon Prime Video
 
#478      
I guess by homegrown talent you mean Sencire (Ohio), Amani (Maryland) and Ty (Michigan)? It seems you are mixing your complaint in a way that doesn't work. We could return to the days of going only for local players and waiting for them to develop but while we are developing them, they are slipping out the portal elsewhere. BU is working with the system as it has to be in the current set of rules. I see that you don't like the system but it is how the game is played. Like (apparently) the stationary screen the old way is gone. Survive and advance.
Homegrown talent in this case was referring to high school recruits (i.e. similar to a farm system/draft prospects). Had nothing to do with geographic location of said recruits. I do not have an issue with using the portal and we've used it very successfully. Where I do start to have an issue is when we are no longer simply recruiting to fill open spots and supplement our roster, but to also block the path of development of prized recruits and may cause locker room issues for what may wind up being nominal gains for the sake of "min-maxing" season roster optimization. I just don't see Amani being relegated to deep depth this season when he was likely expecting at least backup duty on an entirely open roster going into offseason, or Ty being relegated to the bench after likely expecting a starting spot going all that well. That said, the argument against what I'm saying is that Cal has made similar structures work with a new swath of 5* freshmen every year and has won a title and this approach isn't too dissimilar. That said, I have concerns about chemistry, leadership, and morale. And I think Amani could be a very capable backup, and Ty a very capable starter next year if given the opportunity, just like I think Sencire could've been a very capable starter this year had we given him the opportunity instead of signing Justin Harmon. But that's entirely up for debate and I'm certainly happy to agree to disagree.
 
#482      
Homegrown talent in this case was referring to high school recruits (i.e. similar to a farm system/draft prospects). Had nothing to do with geographic location of said recruits. I do not have an issue with using the portal and we've used it very successfully. Where I do start to have an issue is when we are no longer simply recruiting to fill open spots and supplement our roster, but to also block the path of development of prized recruits and may cause locker room issues for what may wind up being nominal gains for the sake of "min-maxing" season roster optimization. I just don't see Amani being relegated to deep depth this season when he was likely expecting at least backup duty on an entirely open roster going into offseason, or Ty being relegated to the bench after likely expecting a starting spot going all that well. That said, the argument against what I'm saying is that Cal has made similar structures work with a new swath of 5* freshmen every year and has won a title and this approach isn't too dissimilar. That said, I have concerns about chemistry, leadership, and morale. And I think Amani could be a very capable backup, and Ty a very capable starter next year if given the opportunity, just like I think Sencire could've been a very capable starter this year had we given him the opportunity instead of signing Justin Harmon. But that's entirely up for debate and I'm certainly happy to agree to disagree.
I disagree with you about Sencire and Ty’s value as starters at the elite college level because of their offensive limitations given their size. We got away with Ty this year because we had Coleman to stretch the floor, and even then, Ty only played an average of about 22-23 minutes a game. Now, both Ty and Sencire DO have significant value in a bench role as defenders, rebounders, hustle guys, etc. But there probably isn’t a need for 2 of those guys on your bench, and then there is the issue of getting those guys to buy in to those roles instead of going looking for a bigger role on a different team.

Amani is a different case. He could be awesome some day, but the staff might be questioning whether he’s ready to start next year. But I do think that as long as he’s healthy he would play a much more significant bench role next year than he did this year. So in his case I am definitely hoping that he stays and continues to develop and he could easily be a starter as a Jr and Sr imo if he can stay healthy.

I think Ty and Sencire are just kind of unique cases as guards who can’t shoot well, unfortunately.
 
#483      
I don't think anyone on that team is good enough to play for us ...
I watched them vs Indiana State, the 6'8" guard from Lithuania (lukosis) has a beautiful stroke and quick release. I'd take him in a heartbeat. Matchup issue at 6'8" had 26 that night, and shoots almost 40% from 3
 
#485      
You realize every other team is trying to upgrade talent too, right?
No, hadn't ever heard that before. You don't say... My argument is that at some point you get diminishing returns and perhaps even negative returns. 6 new portal signings a year isn't always better than 4 which isn't always better than 3, even if those 6 recruits all theoretically look better on paper. Chemistry, leadership, morale, and familiarity with the system all come into play at some point in my opinion. But hey, I could be wrong. I mean I for one have never seen a group of new starters come in and have those theoretical issues...
 
#488      
Ok insiders, if you had your pick of any of the 5’s in the portal currently who would pick?
Man there's a lot I like-Ok State kid, a couple others, but man give me Raynaud or Wolf and I am thrilled. Raynaud will be at worst a second team all conference player and I think Wolf can get to that and he's got 2 years. Either way I would be thrilled. Wolf will be very much in play if Vlad goes to Michigan
 
#489      
Insiders, I have always wondered. If any research is done into how well a player handles a in your face type of coach? In compared to, doesn't take hard coaching well...aka Epps. I want the guys who understand what they are signing up for and want to!!
 
#490      

Mr. Tibbs

southeast DuPage
Cam Spencer didn't get it at UConn.

It's really not that subjective or complicated. It's not like the "hardship" one that Luke Ford was denied with a compelling case whereas Justin Fields got it the same offseason with no apparent case at all.

The incredible story of college football's first -- and only -- eighth-year senior​

and yet the NCAA always seems to make exceptions to their rules when they want to - hence it is certainly worth the try

I doubt he gets it tho
 
#491      
Spencer did play his 5 games at the end of the season, which is counter to what the rulebook on medical redshirts says. Domask played in more games than are allowed under the rulebook, regardless of any possible definition of the length of that SIU season, tweeted rumors to the contrary being flatly and obviously incorrect as ten seconds of googling indicate.

But neither matters.

The operative fact is that the NCAA has repeatedly made clear that no eligibility can be given back for 2020-21 because no eligibility was expended.

You know who really got screwed by this? Ivy League players. The Ivy League canceled their entire season due to Covid, the teams shut down, no games, no practices, Ivy League basketball did not exist.

A star UNC women's player who transferred from Princeton sought a waiver to give her back that season that was lost based on the league's decision. She was denied

St. John's has two former Ivy League players in the same position. They are also seeking waivers like Domask currently

"Both players’ waiver applications are unlikely to be accepted"

Feel free to dislike the NCAA's rationale here. But it is absolutely objective and clear and has been applied in a resolutely consistent manner, which will continue in Domask's case.
Exactly. There were other isolated cases of teams canceling mid-season. None of those players are getting a season.

People talking NCAA waiver are crazy. Damask hired attorneys precisely because there's no hope with NCAA.

Really no clue on the merits of legal.
 
#492      
I disagree with you about Sencire and Ty’s value as starters at the elite college level because of their offensive limitations given their size. We got away with Ty this year because we had Coleman to stretch the floor, and even then, Ty only played an average of about 22-23 minutes a game. Now, both Ty and Sencire DO have significant value in a bench role as defenders, rebounders, hustle guys, etc. But there probably isn’t a need for 2 of those guys on your bench, and then there is the issue of getting those guys to buy in to those roles instead of going looking for a bigger role on a different team.

Amani is a different case. He could be awesome some day, but the staff might be questioning whether he’s ready to start next year. But I do think that as long as he’s healthy he would play a much more significant bench role next year than he did this year. So in his case I am definitely hoping that he stays and continues to develop and he could easily be a starter as a Jr and Sr imo if he can stay healthy.

I think Ty and Sencire are just kind of unique cases as guards who can’t shoot well, unfortunately.

I have no issues with you for disagreeing. People have different takes and I'm definitely higher on Ty, Amani, and Sencire than most of the fanbase at this point. I think I'm pessimistic of them staying because if bringing in multiple players over them is the gameplan next year as illini0440 insinuates, I have a very difficult time believing they will accept those roles over the course of the full season next year and will all likely be gone by this time next year. And that in many ways deeply saddens me as I firmly believed all 3 could have important roles on a title contender in 2 years. But different times... Thank you for your level-headed response though, it is appreciated. And to be fair so far this is going better than the time long ago I tried defending Brandon Paul on here after a bad loss, lol.
 
#493      
On Ty, don’t get me wrong I’d love for him to turn into a knockdown shooter. But in my opinion the thing he needs to work on most is improving his finishing at the rim. He converted a pretty low % as a freshman and that continued as a sophomore. The shots he missed against UConn are a microcosm of that and ones you just need to finish. And he could also, as Bruce told Tisdale, learn to dunk the f****** ball.

If Ty can finish around the basket at a high clip and be assertive (at times he has Ben Simmons esque yips and reluctance to even shoot layups), and figure out how to not get hung up on screens so much on D, I think he can live with his inability to shoot. JMHO.
 
#494      

JFGsCoffeeMug

BU:1 Trash cans:0
Chicago
No, hadn't ever heard that before. You don't say... My argument is that at some point you get diminishing returns and perhaps even negative returns. 6 new portal signings a year isn't always better than 4 which isn't always better than 3, even if those 6 recruits all theoretically look better on paper. Chemistry, leadership, morale, and familiarity with the system all come into play at some point in my opinion. But hey, I could be wrong. I mean I for one have never seen a group of new starters come in and have those theoretical issues...
"Trusting" your existing players and refusing to aggressively engage the transfer portal to fill obvious gaps and upgrade your roster is how you end up with MSU's season. That's a one-way ticket to finishing 0.500 in conference. No thanks.
 
#495      

whatahack

St. Peters MO
Seems like this thread has bandied about every name in the portal. Are there any BU is pursuing that would be a surprise....obviously not looking for names.
 
#496      
Has Kylan Boswell officially entered the portal yet? If not, insiders, any idea when?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.