Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#252      
Jurassic Park Hold Onto Your Butts GIF
Could locking down a big like PJ Hall entice Coleman into returning?

Also, the weird non commitment of Humrichous mean possibly backing off because of Coleman?
 
#254      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
I think that the way we played didn't allow Coleman to show off his defensive versatility ... It showed his weakness more than it did his strengths ...
I think the world of Coleman as a defender and my bet remains on him staying in the draft, getting picked, and establishing himself in the league, HOWEVER

The way we played revealed his weaknesses because he's not quite as versatile as we might hope. He can guard 1-4 in a special way for a guy of his length and showed that off repeatedly this year, but against true down low brawlers he just doesn't have the bulk and ability to anchor.

The success of Illinois Basketball might have been benefitted by us bringing doubles to help him, but that wouldn't have done anything to bolster his defensive reputation with NBA scouts.
 
#256      
Yeah I find it hard to believe he would be worth more to a different school than he would be to us.
Sorry, but that's crazy. Coleman is the perfect add to any top 10 team to put them over the hump.

He'll know more about our team by the time he pulls out of the draft (if he does). But if we look like an 8 seed after our wheel stops spinning, he'd be crazy to not sign up with a top 10 team for a lot of money.
 
#257      

CoalCity

St Paul, MN
Maybe connecting invisible dots but the severe lack of interest in a 5 this cycle may indicate they’ve know Coleman was coming back?
Coleman is NOT coming back to be a 5. Or going anywhere else to be a 5.
 
#258      
I think that its definitely on the table that he comes back to college and it isn't Illinois ...

We do not have a 5 ... Until we do ... We aren't the best situation for him ... Just is what is ...

There are already teams circling on this one ... Blue bloods ...
You don’t think Coleman at the 4 and rolling the dice with Rez ans Booth at the 5 is an option? Probably not one Coleman would buy as legit? I know they’re all “4s” but…
 
Last edited:
#259      
Coleman Hawkins YOU are a Carolina Tar Heel…..


Indy really came from the top rope this morning huh?

If Sallis, Hall, Clayton Jr or Hopkins are realistically options than sign me up.

Right when I thought I was out… @Indy Illini Fan pulls me back in….
They Pull Me Back In Al Pacino GIF by The Godfather
 
#260      
I think that its definitely on the table that he comes back to college and it isn't Illinois ...

We do not have a 5 ... Until we do ... We aren't the best situation for him ... Just is what is ...

There are already teams circling on this one ... Blue bloods ...
Yes we need a solid big 5.
 
#261      
You don’t think Coleman at the 4 and rolling the dice with Rez ans Booth at the 5 is an option? Probably not one Coleman would buy as left? I know they’re all “4s” but…

Booth did not come here to play the 5 ...

Morez does not work with Coleman IMO ... If we want to play like we did last year ...

Morez would be in more of the Dainja role ...
 
#262      
looks like jones is probably not coming right now so what exactly is our game plan to get a big scorer now
Lol have you paid attention to the last like 10 pages of this.

There are like 4-5 big time scorers that just entered the portal.

Hunter Sallis, Bryce Hopkins, and some smoke on Dillon Jones(Weber State kid and an absolute monster on both ends). Plus guys like Sion James and Okpara.
 
#265      

madillini4

Ozamataz Buckshank
Millywaukee
I think that its definitely on the table that he comes back to college and it isn't Illinois ...

We do not have a 5 ... Until we do ... We aren't the best situation for him ... Just is what is ...

There are already teams circling on this one ... Blue bloods ...
University of Michael Jordan?
 
#266      
I think that its definitely on the table that he comes back to college and it isn't Illinois ...

We do not have a 5 ... Until we do ... We aren't the best situation for him ... Just is what is ...

There are already teams circling on this one ... Blue bloods ...
If the staff knew this was an option, why would we give money to guys like Booth and White to play the 4 and not save that and throw a huge/bigger bag at one of the top tier bigs in the portal? Maybe we tried this and I missed it? I just thought it was shot down a couple weeks ago that Coleman was planned on coming back to college and if he even did, it wouldn't be anywhere but here? Obviously, nothing is off the table anymore, just tossing thoughts around.
 
#268      
I can ...

I'm firmly an outsider so I'll definitely defer to you here (actually hadn't refreshed and seen your comment when I commented). So now I'm nervous lol. But I guess if he went out of conference it wouldn't be much different than him going pro so 🤷‍♂️
 
#271      

Tacomallini

Washington State
I don't see why it has to be some grand narrative judgment about BU to go through this incredibly new and chaotic environment and assess it as a learning experience.

Dainja, Storr, and Dante Maddox are three different types of situations and in all three we said "eh, the price isn't right, we think we can do better". IF those were bad decisions (we don't know that yet), that doesn't mean Underwood is an idiot and we need to get rid of him, any more than our forays in trap-happy defense his first two years here meant he was an idiot we needed to get rid of.

BU learns. That's his greatest strength as a coach. And what I find interesting and enjoyable about following the team on this board is learning along with him. But that necessitates looking at things as they are, not making every question a referendum on who has "faith" and who has "doubt".

(And I can't help myself with this, but don't pretend I haven't seen what some of you "faithful" have said about BU in game threads and coaching carousel threads)
the eye flames GIF

Beware, ye "faithful," of the watchful eye of Gritty
 
#275      
Honestly - going to disagree here ... I think that the way we played didn't allow Coleman to show off his defensive versatility ... It showed his weakness more than it did his strengths ...

That frustrated him this season ... It wasn't a secret ...
I agree 100% that asking Coleman to play the 5 position defensively this past season was not a good way to showcase his defensive abilities. In my opinion, that was a roster-building flaw.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.