I went to their shoot around last Thursday (game on Friday) and to me, it looked like the ball still had a poor rotation and didn't look great, but heck.....if he makes one three, it would be more than he would have even taken his sophomore year, when he didn't bother to even look at the rim.
I love Ty, but on a great team at the high D1 level.....he's a glue guy off the bench at best. He'd have an extremely defined role. It could be that he came to that logical conclusion himself? My assumption is that Brad definitely sees value in him being on a really good roster, but his niche is going to be defense, physicality, nastiness, toughness, rebound on both ends, get some greasy buckets and be a leader.
There's a TON of value in that, but in taking on that role, you're pretty much accepting that you're not an NBA player. You're value comes with being a Damonte Williams type bad a$$. Those types of guys are critical to winning championships, but not a lot want to take the role on.