Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,427      
Honestly were it not for the resurgence in us being good in both sports, I might well have just stopped watching college sports entirely.

This product is irredeemable garbage now.


And this is even worse. Stop it.
I'm getting to the point where I'm checking out of college sports altogether. This is worse than free agency in the pros, not knowing year-to-year who's on what team. I enjoy seeing players grow and get better. This isn't enjoyable.
 
#1,429      
Anyone shitting on Brad or anyone in the program over this is stupid. Morez is bailing on the team after being offered a ton of money and a key role. It a doesn’t work out leaving your comfort spot. These kids have some terrible ppl in their ears. He isn’t worth 2 million just to make it clear.
Can this be true and also a lot of us be getting tired of Brad's (don't ban us Dan) !!!!?
 
#1,430      
By offering him 2 million? Hes not worth it.

This isn’t just about money … This whole thing started WAY before this week …

Morez has been committed since he was freaking 16 basically … He gets here and you freaking start Ben Hum Brick House over him ???? UNACCEPTABLE …

It’s not like we’re talking about Domask here … Ben brings absolutely nothing to the table … He’s not a Big Ten player … Yet Brad continued to trot him out there … DUMB …

This crap is on Brad …
 
#1,436      
Illinois gave Morez everything he needed, promised him a huge role next year, upped his NIL (from a deal that was already agreed), and he still decided to leave. Onto the next, good luck Morez.
Why even recruit high school players anymore? Let's just grab Juniors and Seniors from the portal and offer bags of money to players from other teams to transfer or portal to us.
 
#1,437      
Here we go!
I 100% said Fire Brad in frustration to losing a hard working beloved player who was committed two years early. I fully understand the NIL world we live in. Sucks to lose him, but I'm still frustrated at the lack of continuity in our program which seems to be an annual thing, not just with our program. I'm sure we will find someone suitable to replace him and I wish Morez nothing but the best.
 
#1,438      
This isn’t just about money … This whole thing started WAY before this week …

Morez has been committed since he was freaking 16 basically … He gets here and you freaking start Ben Hum Brick House over him ???? UNACCEPTABLE …

It’s not like we’re talking about Domask here … Ben brings absolutely nothing to the table … He’s not a Big Ten player … Yet Brad continued to trot him out there … DUMB …

This crap is on Brad …
This! I would add that the nepotism BS has to be addressed NOW!!
 
#1,440      
So most if not all of the team doesn't like Tyler? And Whitman is fine with this and fine with keeping Hamer on staff? At what point is this ship gonna start sinking?
 
#1,441      
One reason is the NCAA has had many multi billion lawsuits against it including agreeing to multi billion dollar settlements and is unwilling to do anything which restricts athletes abilities out of fear of future lawsuits.
 
#1,442      
Can someone explain how Purdue manages to retain all of their rotation players year over year, while we struggle to keep ANY of our contributors?
They did lose Mason Gillis to be fair, but that's a program that has been constructed to a very specific identity and is very careful and thorough about who they bring into the program in the first place and everything about the way they operate is designed around a revolving pattern of growth.

Brad Underwood has embraced a very different philosophy. Speed dating. Juco.

Brad Underwood has been very successful at that, and I have every confidence he will continue to be. And I think he should be judged solely on results.

This is the sport's fault. This is the powers that be's fault. They've paved paradise and put up a parking lot, don't blame BU for fighting in it, to mangle the metaphor.
 
#1,444      
NCAA hoops is literally dying in front of our eyes. It is pointless to follow except for about 2 weeks in March. No blame to players for getting the bag but interest in a sport that changes entire rosters each year will fall off a cliff in the long run.

And Brad seems to be among the worst at keeping any kind of year to year continuity.
 
#1,445      
Can someone explain how Purdue manages to retain all of their rotation players year over year, while we struggle to keep ANY of our contributors?
No offense to Purdue's role players but they aren't all that talented....

They have really good top end players....Kaufman-Renn, Edey, Smith

Past that they don't have any studs that are getting shopped around in the portal like Illinois does.

Illinois goes and gets guys that have tons of upside instead of just a solid role player. The role player NIL deals are probably very similar across the board compared to the top end guys who you see a wide aray of NIL being thrown their way
 
#1,446      
Couldn’t have said it better myself my friend …

Morgan Freeman Reaction GIF by MOODMAN
As good a time to throw out that Brad needs a reality check on who "coordinates" the offense and defense. Tyler and Hamer will be the downfall of Brad if he does not wake the hell up.
 
#1,447      
Man, I'm not one to argue with insiders... but that's a crap excuse.

This isn't 100% apples to apples because of Edey and it seems like Morez was a bit more developed than TKR as a freshman, but TKR was a top 50 recruit and played 11 mpg as a freshman and 17 mpg as a sophomore and he didn't leave Purdue. Then he averaged 30 mpg this year.

It seems like Morez was a year ahead of TKR. 17 mpg as a freshman and looking at 30 mpg next year.
 
Last edited:
#1,448      
Going to ask a stupid question here and obviously there are in-season decisions that could have been made where there would perhaps be a different outcome...

But why aren't their widely adopted multi-year contract structures in place to mitigate these kinds of situations? Is it uncertainty of funding year over year? I suppose it's still a bit of the Wild West so you open yourself up to a lot of risk by "signing" a guy who ends up being a dud and having to keep a roster spot for him, but it at least would create some more stickiness right?

I know there are those on this board who are more knowledgeable about this, maybe the answer is because it's still essentially it's still early in this age and the NCAA is dragging there feet to do anything material at this point but I'm curious what the hang up is for some kind of real action to create stickiness.
This is 100% correct. Would immediately fix all of these problems. The fact of the matter is, this is a professional league now with no commissioner, no collective bargaining, and therefore no rules. The NCAA hardly bears any responsibility for any of it. They didn't get in front of the issue and make it a truly NIL-based operation and now schools are just paying people. They might blame the settlements. They might blame mass media or the coaches or the fans for demanding change. But it was on them to put a structure in place that could work, and they've failed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back