Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#51      
He's played at Northwestern all 4 years
How much does that really matter when you're getting a guy for just 1 season? That's his whole eligibility. We know right from the outset he's not going to be here the following season.

We've had success with that scenario before, with guys that have been in one place (Domask) and guys that have moved around (Guerrier). For someone of Haggerty's talent you take him. And I don't think it makes sense to blame him for the Jerome Tang dysfunction at K-State. Coleman was on a losing team there too, and we know enough about him as a player to know he does a ton to contribute to winning.
 
#53      
Effective FG% is the better metric because it considers the value of 2's + 3's.


Haggerty's eFG% is 52.3%. For comparison, Kylan Boswell is 52.0% this season. Haggerty carries a heavier burden (volume) on offense, but his defense is (substantially) worse than Kylan's. It only makes sense to consider Haggerty if you think his eFG% will improve quite a bit if his offensive burden decreases (and he's willing to decrease). I would say the history of guards like him making an efficiency leap like that is not good.
 
#55      
To be fair to Haggerty. He looks pretty efficient.. 49%, 47%, 49% shooting from the field on volume the past 3 years. No idea on the defense - though K-State being 111th in defense would probably lead me to an educated guess on BAD.

I think if he's a bought in 2nd or 3rd best player you got an awesome team. If he's your best and leader, in the Big Ten, I'm nervous.

This is the conundrum with bad defenders in Underwood's era. Illinois isn't going to create a lot of havoc on defense so that means individual players can be viciously targeted. If Haggerty is your 3rd best player, is it worth it when he's put in a pick-and-roll on defense on every single possession?
 
#56      
Effective FG% is the better metric because it considers the value of 2's + 3's.


Haggerty's eFG% is 52.3%. For comparison, Kylan Boswell is 52.0% this season. Haggerty carries a heavier burden (volume) on offense, but his defense is (substantially) worse than Kylan's. It only makes sense to consider Haggerty if you think his eFG% will improve quite a bit if his offensive burden decreases (and he's willing to decrease). I would say the history of guards like him making an efficiency leap like that is not good.
He’s carrying an awful team. He’s 3rd in the country in scoring.

Was 3rd in the country in scoring last year as well. That Memphis team was not bad (5 seed) and he was still terrific - conference POY over yaxel.

Also averages 5 rebounds. I’m just not brave enough to pass on that kind of stat stuffer.
 
Last edited:
#59      
Season 2 Wow GIF by The Lonely Island


he looks huge! goosed up and ready to contribute!
 
#61      
I heard we are trading Brad straight up to KSU in exchange for PJ Haggerty. Any truth to the rumor?

/s (using this only because I know how this board can react)
 
#62      
How much does that really matter when you're getting a guy for just 1 season? That's his whole eligibility. We know right from the outset he's not going to be here the following season.

We've had success with that scenario before, with guys that have been in one place (Domask) and guys that have moved around (Guerrier). For someone of Haggerty's talent you take him. And I don't think it makes sense to blame him for the Jerome Tang dysfunction at K-State. Coleman was on a losing team there too, and we know enough about him as a player to know he does a ton to contribute to winning.

Oh, for sure. I was just answering the question about how he is different from Martinelli. Seemed a few had pause knowing he's been at 4 different schools so that was my take. As someone else said, the Memphis team he was on was 29-6 and how could you not be excited by the offensive #s?
 
#66      
Quentin Coleman, 6'4", 180-pound, Class of 2026 Guard from Principia High School in St. Louis County, MO. After his decommitment from Wake Forest, will he go back to the other 5 schools in his final six? That would be Illinois, SLU, Iowa, Texas A&M, and Texas Tech. His ranking in the Clas of 26 has skyrocketed, so I wouldn't be shocked if the likes of Duke, Michigan, Kansas, and Arizona go after Coleman real hard. Do any of you insiders or posters have any info about this re-opened recruitment?
Duke
 
#68      
The points are a bonus but seeing 15 boards along with 9 assists, woah 😮
I feel like that's the BU formula:

1. Positional size
2. Rebounding
3. Court vision/decision making
4a. Perimeter shooting
4b. Scoring in the paint.

Not even a prospect unless you have at least 2 of 1-3 plus at least one of 4a/4b.

The ideal scenario is obviously having all 5, which gets you a Wagler or Mirk.
 
#75      
I feel like that's the BU formula:

1. Positional size
2. Rebounding
3. Court vision/decision making
4a. Perimeter shooting
4b. Scoring in the paint.

Not even a prospect unless you have at least 2 of 1-3 plus at least one of 4a/4b.

The ideal scenario is obviously having all 5, which gets you a Wagler or Mirk.
Add passing in there somewhere too. It’s court vision adjacent but definitely its own skill.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back