Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

#376      
I think we can all agree that we are going to be showing Ty love wherever he goes and we will catch all his games we can. Forever Illini legend and EDG. Go be great dog
Definitely a Ty Rodgers fan and will be rooting for him wherever he ends up. He’s been through a lot, so I hope he finds a great fit and contributes.
 
#378      
Which announcement do we anticipate being first: Andrej or Blackwell’s commitment?
No idea, but I would guess Andrej. It SOUNDS like we are inside the 5 yard-line with that negotiation.

A Denzel appearance with a wry smile popped up when he was asked about yesterday.

P. S. See post #212 by @FI_8905
 
Last edited:
#379      
I really do think where we've gone since then reflects Brad evolving as a coach from the red-faced treadmill jockey stereotype to someone who can bring the best out of a broader range of personalities. Not that the Podz case created that change, I think it has just happened organically.

But it really is comical how high-horsed people get about refusing to admit the mistake here. To act like the staff can't have misevaluated isn't bad analysis, it's ultimately just not analysis at all.


We've got a chance to be. When you're a top 5 KenPom team who made the Final Four it's hard to push even further upward, but with our Big Four back we've got a real chance.

Vaaks, Coleman, Stojakovic, Mirk, Tomi with Z, Jake Davisic, Lee and Morillo on the bench does feel a man light though.

I think the question is whether the missing guy is a big who pushes the rotation up the positional ladder and strengthens the rebounding versus a quick little guard who pushes the rotation down the positional ladder and adds to our shooting and ability to check smaller guards.
I wasn't happy with Underwood screaming at Epps the following year, but where was it that Podz left because Brad was too mean?

I've only ever seen that he left because he wasn't guaranteed minutes and believed he was being recruited over.
 
#380      
Source?

It’s your take, and that’s fine, but it’s clearly what the staff aims to prioritize.
The source is reading the messaging from the insiders that we will be fine if Blackwell doesn't come. That, to me, is them trying to let us down easy; the Blackwell-to-Illinois situation does not seem to be going as well as thought.
 
#382      
I wasn't happy with Underwood screaming at Epps the following year, but where was it that Podz left because Brad was too mean?

I've only ever seen that he left because he wasn't guaranteed minutes and believed he was being recruited over.

You are correct. Pods left over playing time. But I agree Brad has really mellowed out over his tenure here and I like it. He’s still intense but much much focused on his intensity.
 
Last edited:
#384      
I wasn't happy with Underwood screaming at Epps the following year, but where was it that Podz left because Brad was too mean?

I've only ever seen that he left because he wasn't guaranteed minutes and believed he was being recruited over.
If I remember correctly, he left after Skyy Clark committed. I think we can all admit we would have preferred Podz over Clark that year.
 
#386      
The source is reading the messaging from the insiders that we will be fine if Blackwell doesn't come. That, to me, is them trying to let us down easy; the Blackwell-to-Illinois situation does not seem to be going as well as thought.
Indy said:
Do we need one ?

That should tell you where I think we are at with Blackwell but also should tell you how confident I am and the staff is telling me they are with Coleman …
(in regards to needing a replacement)
 
Last edited:
#389      
This may be a hot take, but I think Stojakovic being retained is more important than Blackwell.

When I look at the list of players, and I want to give Isaac Trotter full credit for this because he discussed it at length, the names available to replace Stojakovic are really underwhelming. There just aren’t great options.

As far as Blackwell’s position, there are many more solid options, whether it is McNeil, or Hiill, or rolling with Coleman, etc. You get the idea.
 
#390      
Interesting that we seem to have made the cut for Zens and Wisconsin didn’t. Similar systems but sure seems like a much clearer path to a role and PT at Wisconsin, maybe as soon as this year. Seems like a good prospect but I don’t see any way he cracks the rotation this year, and will likely get recruited/portaled over in coming years.

I do feel for Gard as I think he’s a good coach, but I saw someone call him Wisconsin’s Bruce Weber and that’s probably pretty close, although a. He has had more success than Weber after the prior coaches recruits left and 2. I don’t know that anyone could do better at Wisconsin as it seems like they don’t have great resources for basketball.
 
#391      
We better hope Niko Medved is never able to put together a real roster at Minnesota. I believe in that guy as much as almost anyone in the B10.
I would imagine their NIL is close to nil; (on the basketball side mostly) which sucks greasy, grimy, golden gofer guts for NM.

Maybe one of the insiders can weigh in…?
 
Last edited:
#392      
We are good with who we have coming back at this moment. I now trust staff to plug holes and get the right character fits on roster. So much good talent in portal.
 
#396      
Indy said:

(in regards to needing a replacement)

1776371986872.png


Indy's CB has been pretty good so far. 17/19 by my count as of this post.

Full list in the Sheet
 
#397      
Yeah if we don't end up getting Blackwell, that would not be a surprise to me, as we've missed before on our early high profile portal targets.

What would be a surprise to me, though, is if we miss but also NOT pivot to someone new, whether that ends up being a different guard or someone bigger. Brad and the staff have always been great at the pivot, so it would be odd to me if we are willing to give a huge bag to Blackwell, but if it doesn't work out, then we're just going to say, "eh, nevermind, we're good with what we have"??

And that kind of seems to be the insider sentiment if Blackwell falls through? Maybe I'm reading through the lines wrong...
If you have to spend all the money on #TheRetention, spend all the money on #TheRetention.

And Vaaks will not have come cheap. He's arguably a more valuable asset than Blackwell given the extra years of eligibility.

I like the idea of giving Lee the surplus guard job. It's that fourth big that's a bit of a head-scratcher. Humrichous was really critical for us in terms of making lineups work.
 
#399      
If I remember correctly, he left after Skyy Clark committed. I think we can all admit we would have preferred Podz over Clark that year.
Sure. But that's like saying I would've preferred two dozen other players over Wagler at the beginning of this year.

No one knew Clark would be a flop, who knows if Podz would've been the same player without a 26% usage rate he had at Santa Clara or if he would've been able to maximize his potential under Brad.

It's not like the dude ended up at Duke or even Wisconsin/Marquette, the majority of high major basketball passed on the guy...so the gotcha-ism that pops up with folks saying ButwhataboutPodz when we won a b10 title the year he was here and then went to an e8 and a f4 since is confounding
 
Back