Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

#851      
You think Vaaks and Coleman > Keaton and Boswell? IMO that’s extremely unrealistic.
Keaton is undoubtedly the best player of that bunch. No question about it. I also firmly believe Vaaks & Coleman is a better offensive package than Wagler & Bos. This is not a knock on Kylan, I think that hand injury really derailed him, but let’s be honest - He was tough to watch offensively in the back half of the season
 
#852      
Keaton was amazing. It's very likely none of our guards are as good as he was this year. However, I think the sum of them can be as good or better than the guard play this year.

Kylan cemented himself as a program legend, but we made a final four with him being borderline unplayable offensively the last bit of the season after he came back from injury.
Great points, but what I think Illinois might miss next year is someone who has no problem getting to the hole like KB. Yes, Wagler was able to get to the hole, but it was more methodical and got pounded on the way.

I would just like another PG who has those skills to get to the hole without getting mauled, so he can dish for easy layups and score some baskets, too. There are going to be times when the offense gets stagnated, and when it does, a guy like KB can break it down. That's all.
 
#853      
Anyone watch Coleman in the jordan brand classic that just happened? Seemed hard to find out where to watch or even get a box score.
 
#854      
Watch Coleman play in the Jordan Brand Classic at 9:30 ct. Search YouTube to find the stream.
 
#855      
I think Vaaks/Coleman/Morillo can be really damn good, yes.
I think most of us are disappointed because with how spread out our success as a program has been, next year is a once in a lifetime chance with what we have returning. We were hoping for proven pieces to complete the team, instead of hopes and prayers to get lucky with another late blooming star other programs missed on. Most of the time, the proven pieces will win out.

Two years from now I'll be thrilled to keep our 20 wins and tournament run going with all the turnover. Was hoping all the chips were on the table and no stone left unturned this year. Tired of being in the 2nd tier when we have the ability to be in the first.

We will be cheering them on. Hope we won't be found wanting at the end of the year.
 
#856      
There's so many things that are wrong here, not sure where to start.

1) Look around the country. There are not going to be five teams with a better roster than Illinois. There are blue bloods with three to five players total on their roster as we stand with not much runway to add.

2) A lot of people in here said the team before the season started last year was not going to be very good or was super flawed. Illinois just returned 3 guys would would have been TOP FIVE portal players. They also just added a five star level freshman and maybe the best possible (top 15 transfer) portal guard fit for their system.

Quentin Coleman does not need to be as good or better than Wagler to have a better team than last year. Tomi (knock on wood) will be healthier. Mirk DID NOT EVEN GET AN OFFSEASON last year. Imagine what he is going to look like with another seven months working with Fletch. Andrej is likely to make a leap in year two.

Also, Lucas Morillo is getting massively overlooked here. They think Ethan Brown can contribute as well as a depth add. Depending on if Lee sticks around or they add a veteran guard to replace him, that's more depth than you had there this past season.

QC, Vaaks, Drej, Mirkovic, Tomislav, Jake, Big Z, Morillo, Lee (add if he goes), Brown.

That is one of the best rosters in the country next season and can win a title.
This. I was very impressed by Morillo in the Nike games. Strong, tough, under control. Didn’t force anything, let the game come to him. Has some Dawg in him, OA connection, reminds me of a bigger Feiiz with better shot. Super excited to see him in the O & B next year!
 
#857      
Great points, but what I think Illinois might miss next year is someone who has no problem getting to the hole like KB. Yes, Wagler was able to get to the hole, but it was more methodical and got pounded on the way.

I would just like another PG who has those skills to get to the hole without getting mauled, so he can dish for easy layups and score some baskets, too. There are going to be times when the offense gets stagnated, and when it does, a guy like KB can break it down. That's all.
Andrej gets to the hole pretty consistently. Coleman can as well.
 
#858      
If the staff doesn’t add a veteran guard, they are taking a huge risk. Talking about a national championship but having a freshman point guard. Literally has only happened once in modern basketball (and that player was a top 5 one and done stud). Add to that the other guard is a sophomore unproven at this level.

I’ll put it here first, if we rely on unproven players to be a top team and those players don’t perform highly then it’s on the coaching staff. It is an unnecessary and foreseeable risk. (This is coming from someone who has seen QC play in person 5 times in the last 3 months).

Might work out. Might not. Not worth the risk when we have this vetaran talent.
I agree with your general point, but as of now, Vaaks is our PG, and he's not a freshman. Would be nice to add Cox to have another capable ball-handler, who also happens to be quick and athletic.
 
#860      
Crazy that people are assuming Vaaks/Coleman going to average over 30 points, 9 rebounds and 7 assists combined. Crazy. I’ll wager ANY amount that doesn’t happen.
I dont think it is likely either but when healthy Wagler/Bam played a ton, probably 70 minutes or more. I would think Vaaks plays a ton like Wagler but AC/Morrilo combined to equal around the minutes Bam played. As a group they can do that in the 70 or so minutes those 3 play. Plus, we still may add a guard.
 
#862      
I think most of us are disappointed because with how spread out our success as a program has been, next year is a once in a lifetime chance with what we have returning. We were hoping for proven pieces to complete the team, instead of hopes and prayers to get lucky with another late blooming star other programs missed on. Most of the time, the proven pieces will win out.

Two years from now I'll be thrilled to keep our 20 wins and tournament run going with all the turnover. Was hoping all the chips were on the table and no stone left unturned this year. Tired of being in the 2nd tier when we have the ability to be in the first.

We will be cheering them on. Hope we won't be found wanting at the end of the year.
We’ll be ranked higher in the pre-season polls than both Michigan and UConn were last year. Not sure I’d call a Final Four / Top 5 finish along with a pre-season top 5 squad second tier.
 
#863      
No offense, but this is a ridiculous take. Wagler was an All-American and the best player on the team by a mile.

Vaaks + Coleman is a definite downgrade from Wagler + Boswell.
It's not a ridiculous take because we haven't seen what Vaaks + Coleman can do. If someone told you last year at this time that Wagler + Boswell was going to be better than KJ + Boswell you would have laughed them right of this forum and you would have turned out to have been wrong. We just don't know until we see it.
 
Last edited:
#864      
I think you’re underestimating how much better players can jump year to year at this age and also comparing a finished product team in April with defined roles and development to now.

Keaton in October is not the same Keaton in April.

Look at Ben year 2 vs year 1
Having made a post supporting the same thing, I will say there are no guarantees of what kind of improvement comes year to year.

But that said, it is rare that motivated kids, like this group of Illini, work in the weight room and at improving their skills and do not get significantly better when given the chance as well as motivated to show such improvement. In fact, it is quite rare. So based solely on the returners, all having significant numbers as starters, this team could be improved on the basis of 6 veteran returners. Add a couple of frosh with skills and promise, and we have a potentially elite team. Add another vet transfer and let Illini Nation boost this team to a title.

I have always realized that the biggest challenge in the success of the last handful of seasons was the ability for BU to figure out the chemistry. But in the coming season, that will be a minimal problem.
 
#865      
Two years from now I'll be thrilled to keep our 20 wins and tournament run going with all the turnover. Was hoping all the chips were on the table and no stone left unturned this year. Tired of being in the 2nd tier when we have the ability to be in the first.
Make It Stop The Office GIF

Can't do this an entire offseason (again) after we just spent 15+ million on this roster.
 
#868      
Relax, this Coleman kid is going to be a special player.
I think that this freshman class is VERY special. The are the foundation for a great team in years to come if they stick together. Add a big or two next year and they may be world beaters.

But they're FRESHMEN. Counting on them to carry the team like Keaton did is asking a lot. Acquiring Blackwell as the second guard would mean that we wouldn't have to count on any freshmen. We'd have 7 players who are proven performers at every position with 5 freshmen being initiated into Illini basketball by years end. talent? yes! experience? no....

Love this team....but we're short one scorer at guard.

I. E. we're not quite done...

P.S. In my 70 years of watching Illini basketball, we've NEVER had a freshman before like Keaton Wagler. Should we count on that two years in a row??
 
#870      
It is a good team. Not a stand out team. Relying on some luck with help and a lot of faith in Freshman. I get 1 but counting on 2, 3 or even 4 is a tall task. Hopefully they pick up a vet because Brandon looked unplayable last year. At the end of the day do I wish we went for the jugular sure, but Brad has earned my wait and see approach.
 
#872      
I think most of us are disappointed because with how spread out our success as a program has been, next year is a once in a lifetime chance with what we have returning. We were hoping for proven pieces to complete the team, instead of hopes and prayers to get lucky with another late blooming star other programs missed on. Most of the time, the proven pieces will win out.

Two years from now I'll be thrilled to keep our 20 wins and tournament run going with all the turnover. Was hoping all the chips were on the table and no stone left unturned this year. Tired of being in the 2nd tier when we have the ability to be in the first.

We will be cheering them on. Hope we won't be found wanting at the end of the year.
"Most of us"?

Speak for yourself! They had an amazing off-season. They just went to a Final Four, two years after an Elite 8 and they'll be one of the favorites to win the whole thing this year.

Take that crap out of here. Seriously. That BS is old.
 
#875      
It is a good team. Not a stand out team. Relying on some luck with help and a lot of faith in Freshman. I get 1 but counting on 2, 3 or even 4 is a tall task. Hopefully they pick up a vet because Brandon looked unplayable last year. At the end of the day do I wish we went for the jugular sure, but Brad has earned my wait and see approach.
Yeah we'll barely get to 20 wins and into the tournament with any luck :rolleyes:
 
Back