What I don't understand is how we went from:
We're willing to spend millions on Blackwell, which would be the knockout punch that makes us a very likely preseason #1.
To:
We're good. Don't need to solidify the guard spot at all or use all/any of that money that we have available. Even though we really only have 2-3 true guards.
It really doesn't seem like an unreasonable take. It kinda feels like someone said "I'm leaving if you bring in another guard". I can't think of any other reason to not spend at least a portion of that money to make sure an injury doesn't derail next season.
At this point, I'd be relieved if Ty or Lee came back. I know Ty's not a guard, but he can be a Swiss Army knife when a need arises. Also could back up Mirk for short bursts.
Seems pretty simple to me:
— Heading into the off-season the staff prioritized retention, replacing Keaton as an on-ball creator, and the pursuit of Blackwell.
— They succeeded in both retention and landing an on-ball playmaker.
— The day Andrej agreed to return, we fell out of the running with Blackwell. 48 hours after that, our 5 star recruit who had committed, but had not signed, signed.
— The timing hints that either one or both of Andrej and Coleman would not be on next year’s team if the staff continued to pursue Blackwell.
— You can disagree with that decision and wish the staff would’ve prioritized Blackwell over #TheRetention, but based on the timeline, I don’t think there’s a world in which all 3 of Blackwell, Andrej, and Coleman are on next year’s team regardless of resources.
— I’d like some extra depth at guard too, but as others have pointed out, it doesn’t seem like it’s easy to attract a player better than Ethan Brown who’s also willing to be the 9th man in the rotation. Justin Harmon was pretty much that for the E8 team and in the NCAAT that year he literally averaged 1.25 points and 1.0 rebounds per game. Not sure a guy like that raises our ceiling or floor all that much.