Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

#126      
In a few games that is what got us in trouble. This is just anecdotal data in service of a position you've staked out for years now, which is that small guards are good (I remember because of how distraught you were about DGL leaving, which struck me as a bit odd based on what he'd actually contributed in his time here).

In other games it was a 6-6 wing who drained 6 threes (Pryce Sandfort), a triplet of bigs who are as opposite as you can get from a compact floor general (Michigan), or a combination of a long wing who can shoot and a physical big (Mullins/Reed - UConn). Against Maryland we struggled against two big guards who combined for 44 points and just 3 assists. If I were to just use those examples, and ignore counter examples, I could stake out the opposite position that we struggled with size and length last season so we need to get bigger. This is why you don't rely exclusively on anecdotal evidence.
I wonder if we focus on the opposing guard-play losses (MSU, Wisconsin x2, and UCLA) because those were when we got beat in overtime to inferior teams? We were incredibly close to pulling out the win, only for their guards to punch us in the mouth repeatedly, so they sting the most.
 
#129      
Yeah, it's not so much about individual roles as the traits and skills you can put in a five man lineup.

Last year's team had trouble with compact floor general true PG types. Fears, Braeden Smith, Nick Boyd, Donovan Dent, etc. At both ends, those guys could get where they wanted on offense and could get underneath our ballhandlers and gum us up at the other end.

That's going to get worse next year, not better. We got creative to work around that disadvantage last year, more creativity will be needed.

There are so many players who have this missing skillset, that's what's weird and a bit frustrating. We've got all these size/skill unicorns that are impossible to find, but there are tons of pugnacious little ballhandlers out there.

Let's go get one!
I thought our big guys did a LOT better with help on guards and challenging shots at the rim without fouling in the tournament. Hopefully, we see that effort continue. The biggest advantage of the retention, is that gaining buy-in shouldn't take so long. David was awful on defense when he showed up late last summer, by all accounts. He embraced the coaching and got a lot better. Andrej as well.

The new guys this year will need to do the same, but I think the raw materials are there. Vaaks and Coleman both have enough length and./or athleticism to be more than fine on that end. It's matter of developing strength, understanding the scheme, and effort.
 
#131      
does the portal ever really close...?

thoughts @pruman91
psyc127.gif


Portal always open...............it really really is..................
 
#133      
With no more additions this team reminds me more and I will have expectations closer to the 05-06 Illini then the 04-05 Illini. A good team with a good record who brought back starters but not THE starter and great Illini team, but not great all of basketball standards like 88-89 and 04-05 who still get brought up as best teams to not win it all.

Its definitely strange how two camps looks at the same team and 1 camp perceives a gaping guard hole and the other camp says this is the championship team as is and nobody even pretends the other is close to accurate.
This team has a lot better overall talent than 05-06 and it's not close.
 
#134      
Seems like maybe we need another Ben H. Either as a backup at the 4 or a guard. Someone who is fine with that type of role. Coming from a lower-level program and happy to be on a final four contender and content to be that role guy. And be able to hit 3s. But maybe Ben was also a unicorn in that way?
 
#135      
Agreed, but I'm even more confused by Ty leaving. With his ability to guard 1-4, plus all of our bigs being able to play on the perimeter, you would think he would find a good amount of minutes.
Right now, I'd be very happy with Ty being our next "addition." Absent injury, he's not going to start (which may be a no-go for him). But I think he would play a lot because he can do the things we need given our roster make-up. Can defend 1-4, handle the ball fairly well, and is a beast of a rebounder. And he's certainly not "ball-dominant."
 
#136      
This team has a lot better overall talent than 05-06 and it's not close.
Fully agreed. That 05-06 had so little support for Auggie and Dee Brown. There was plenty of hype around some others like Brian Randle but really there were just two reliable scorers in that squad.
 
#137      
Fair enough.
You tell me who.
What mid major PG is out there who is willing to sit on the bench and play 15 minutes a game?
Oh, absolutely.

As a baseline, Justin Harmon - who was very glad to come play here - averaged 14pts, 3.8rebs, 2.9ast at UTAH Valley. At Illinois, he played 18.7 minutes per game.

You could literally go on and on, but here's 3 guys with similar profiles at their most recent stops.



If he is good enough to do that he's good enough to start for other teams. If he is good enough to start he is good enough to get double the NIL money elsewhere.
Actually... it's the other way around. You'll make much more playing 15 minutes here than starting for a penurious school like Boston College, Utah, DePaul, etc.
 
Last edited:
#139      
Coleman is not backup PG. He’s going to start at SG.

Morillo is interesting since he can play 1-4. The thing is we’re counting on him to be ready. If he is, he’ll definitely see the court since he can fill 4 of the 5 spots.

+1

Morillo is going to be our Swiss Army knife. should be a great showcase for his game
 
#140      
In a few games that is what got us in trouble. This is just anecdotal data in service of a position you've staked out for years now, which is that small guards are good (I remember because of how distraught you were about DGL leaving, which struck me as a bit odd based on what he'd actually contributed in his time here).
Fair enough I suppose, I have been a skeptic of "positionless basketball" for a long time.

But it's just a fact that quick penetrating guards with fast hands who know how to play with leverage are an asset.

And as the announcers never went five minutes without telling us last year, we were the tallest team in America. That's mostly a plus, but everything in life has tradeoffs, the same abilities which let us shoot over everybody and dominate the boards makes us vulnerable to those ankle-bitey guards.

Anyway, in terms of being a high-energy guard with a swag streak, I loved seeing DGL become the player I knew he could be from afar this year, and I can see some of those same traits in Coleman which is exciting.

This team has a lot better overall talent than 05-06 and it's not close.
Better basketball players, especially in the frontcourt. Rich McBride and Brian Randle just kinda never became the players their talent level could have made possible.

But goodness gracious, imagine adding Dee to our current team. Pitch perfect, as good of an ankle-bitey guard as the Big Ten has ever seen.
 
Last edited:
#141      
Am I crazy to think Vaaks might be our best player next year?
Vaaks has lottery pick potential to my eye, especially in what's thought to be a weaker class next year.

I have no idea what's going to happen once he's in orange. He may meet the challenge or he may crumble under the weight of the expectations. Maybe it takes him two or three seasons rather than one. But there's no doubt the legitimate NBA potential jumps off the screen.
 
#144      
I think this is legitimate too. I'm sure the #1 negative feedback item from NBA evals is going to be his tendency to keep the ball a second too long when trapped/doubled or driving into a crowd. He needs to add more playmaking ability to his game that isn't just him knifing through for a close range shot.

Illinois should have even more ballhandlers than last season, imo.

All of the negativity has to do with the Blackwell rug pull, but I'm not convinced he was ever a real option anyway unless Andrej was to leave or Coleman decommitted. For all of the hype about Blackwell, 95% of what he adds to a team is scoring (which we will not have any issues doing anyway). He's not a plus defender, he's not a plus passer, he just takes field goal attempts away from other players. He shot 43% overall last season, so its not as if he's uber-efficient in doing it either.

With his about-face from 'wanting to win' to 'wanting usage' I'm gonna have to go ahead and coin the nickname "John Blackhole"
His TS% was 59.3- about the same as Wagler. He took a lot of 3s and FTs, so his FG% is meaningless
 
#145      
This team has a lot better overall talent than 05-06 and it's not close.
I personally ranked last year's team 4th since 88 89. You can quable about an exact number but 05 06 is somewhere around 6th 7th......this team is appearing to start at the 5th spot. Slightly worse then last year's. So closer to the 0506 team then the first spot. Only 2 guys who started the final four will be starting this year unless something changes I believe thats the same at 06.

If everyone plays to their max ability they can jump way up the list. A couple injuries and or underperfoming at the wrong spots they can drop off.
 
#146      
5% of loyalty: people who think we’re going to be bad and who clearly don’t know anything about basketball

90% of loyalty: people complaining about those people as if there is way more of it than there actually is

The other 5%: insiders trying to find out if they should give us any more info
5% of loyalty: likes cottage cheese
5% of loyalty: doesn't like cottage cheese
90% of loyalty: annoyed about posts about cottage chees
 
#147      
Yeah, it's not so much about individual roles as the traits and skills you can put in a five man lineup.

Last year's team had trouble with compact floor general true PG types. Fears, Braeden Smith, Nick Boyd, Donovan Dent, etc. At both ends, those guys could get where they wanted on offense and could get underneath our ballhandlers and gum us up at the other end.

That's going to get worse next year, not better. We got creative to work around that disadvantage last year, more creativity will be needed.

There are so many players who have this missing skillset, that's what's weird and a bit frustrating. We've got all these size/skill unicorns that are impossible to find, but there are tons of pugnacious little ballhandlers out there.

Let's go get one!
Sign me up for a pug!
pug gifmedogs GIF by Rover.com
 
#149      
I personally ranked last year's team 4th since 88 89. You can quable about an exact number but 05 06 is somewhere around 6th 7th......this team is appearing to start at the 5th spot. Slightly worse then last year's. So closer to the 0506 team then the first spot. Only 2 guys who started the final four will be starting this year unless something changes I believe thats the same at 06.

If everyone plays to their max ability they can jump way up the list. A couple injuries and or underperfoming at the wrong spots they can drop off.

Ya, but with Jake and Andrej coming back they combined to start 43 games last year...

Finding a way to take all those starts out of the equation is quite the creative loophole.
 
Last edited:
#150      
I personally ranked last year's team 4th since 88 89. You can quable about an exact number but 05 06 is somewhere around 6th 7th......this team is appearing to start at the 5th spot. Slightly worse then last year's. So closer to the 0506 team then the first spot. Only 2 guys who started the final four will be starting this year unless something changes I believe thats the same at 06.

If everyone plays to their max ability they can jump way up the list. A couple injuries and or underperfoming at the wrong spots they can drop off.
1. 88-89
2. 04-05
3. 00-01
4. 25-26
5. 20-21
6. 23-24
 
Back