To @ChiefGritty ’s point, football has never been measured with this sort of precision. Does anyone see the irony in measuring distance with chains and spotting balls by visual memory while squinting at video to decide whether to overturn a fractional second in timing discrepancy? It’s incongruent. If we really want to go down the precision road, it’s technically possible.
Record time to tenth of a second. Start and stop the clock assisted by audio and visual sensors, but be sure to correct for the distance from the whistle to the sensor, adjusting for the speed of sound. Is there something better than a whistle though? Human error! Can’t have that, so more work is needed. Some sort of AI video bot replacing officials? I’m sure even a crude video bot would have flagged that egregious face mask! Distances aren’t nearly precise enough for this brave new game. We could spot the ball based on video replays or maybe even GPS. Surveying with GPS is now accurate to 1/4”, so why not football? A century ago surveyors literally measured distance with chains, noting the number of chain links on plats.
However, this new game would be a sterile joke. We saw a faked glimpse of it last week, with officials pretending the clocks are operated with enough precision to overturn a call hinging on one second (probably less) at the end of the game. Does anyone really want to go further down this road? It doesn’t enhance the sport.
Record time to tenth of a second. Start and stop the clock assisted by audio and visual sensors, but be sure to correct for the distance from the whistle to the sensor, adjusting for the speed of sound. Is there something better than a whistle though? Human error! Can’t have that, so more work is needed. Some sort of AI video bot replacing officials? I’m sure even a crude video bot would have flagged that egregious face mask! Distances aren’t nearly precise enough for this brave new game. We could spot the ball based on video replays or maybe even GPS. Surveying with GPS is now accurate to 1/4”, so why not football? A century ago surveyors literally measured distance with chains, noting the number of chain links on plats.
However, this new game would be a sterile joke. We saw a faked glimpse of it last week, with officials pretending the clocks are operated with enough precision to overturn a call hinging on one second (probably less) at the end of the game. Does anyone really want to go further down this road? It doesn’t enhance the sport.
Last edited: