When did I make excuses for anyone? I think people get on these message board high horses, have incorrect legal takes and then want to denigrate people's character which is classless. I spoke only to the facts of what was shown in the video. I never called either coach or their players a name. I only highlighted what they could've done to avoid the mayhem that followed.
Regarding "high horses" I haven't seen much of that here. I've seen lot of people, me included, who note that it's probably desirable to have a high standard of conduct for an adult man leading a group of postadolescent athletes routinely appearing on a national stage having a substantial following, and that the ability to govern emotions, especially when provoked, and refrain from physical violence toward another player or adult is equally desirable. I don't understand how anyone who watches any amount of college basketball can fail to discern that Juwan has an unusual hair trigger temper and has behaved inappropriately within the norms of the game and the culture on several notable occasions, even by the debased standards we accept today.
If that's a high horse, I'm happy to saddle up on it, deploy my spurs on its hindquarters, and head off into the hills.
As for incorrect legal takes, it seems to me that the law is well beside the point, and an intellectual distraction here. The fundamental issue is behavior: self-discipline, providing a positive role model for the young men who look up to the coach (esp a coach who was a college and NBA star), and instilling values that will help them lead productive, full lives. I shouldn't need to point out that a not-inconsiderable fraction of players come from challenging circumstances in which boundaries are sometimes blurry or nonexistent, and their lives have been chaotic and sometimes dangerous. They are especially in need of a strong role model and rigorous structure in their lives. If they don't get it at this age, they're likely doomed. In fact, I recall distinctly the ESPN
30 for 30 documentary on the Fab 5 in which Howard or Webber (IIRC) noted with bitterness that Krzyzewski wouldn't deign to recruit him because of perceived behavioral instability based on his origin.
Is my take Pollyannaish, sanctimonious BS detached from reality? I don't think so. It seems to me to be the bedrock underlying the matter.