Michigan State 87, Illinois 74 POSTGAME

Status
Not open for further replies.
#76      
Underwood's switch to a pack line defense last year after OSU started 0-6 in conference is well documented and has been frequently discussed.

Correct, that switch was to address DIFFERENT issues that team had. IL does NOT have the same issues that his OSU team did. Not to mention IL does not have a Jawun Evans that is now in the NBA.
 
#77      
[YOUTUBE]Mp6DJIh1xfs[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]xAhPiZ9nTQ8[/YOUTUBE]
[youtube]5K4cPxHLo9g[/youtube]
 
Last edited:
#78      
Like, if you're watching that game tonight, and your immediate takeaway is anything other than "wow, there are levels of athleticism, and we are on a decidedly different one than they are"....I honestly don't know what to tell you.

Michigan State spent a good chunk of the game literally jumping over us and we've got people saying "Boy, maybe we should've slowed this thing down and gotten more half-court looks in this one."
 
#79      
Of course not. I never said its the only reason. Our biggest disadvantage is our athleticism. The exact same thing that a high pressure defense relies on. Doubling down on this philosophy is mind boggling to me.

Do people not realize how bad our defense is? I mean.....am I that crazy to think a change is needed. Next year's roster ain't gonna be much different.

Yes you are that crazy
 
#80      
Underwood's switch to a pack line defense last year after OSU started 0-6 in conference is well documented and has been frequently discussed.

Against Nebraska in the first 10 minutes Illinois had already fouled themselves into a serious disadvantage and were getting beat off the dribble again and again. Underwood switched to zone and completely changed the game. Nebraska would end up shooting 3-15 against the zone.

You're not wrong, but it's not all about winning right now. BU is trying to establish a culture and is teaching a young team. We're picking up the bumps and bruises right now but it should make us stronger in the long run. The goal is 2-3 years from now if a guy commits to UI, he knows exactly what he is coming here to do. Pressure the ball, force turnovers, play fast, push the ball, throw oops, and play with intensity.

Groce won a good amount of games his first year. But after 5 years we still didn't know what his teams were trying to accomplish on the court. He never established an identity.

Ultimately, BU's first year means nothing. You should've learned that lesson from Groce. It's all about where we are in 2-3 years. And I think in 2-3 years these freshmen will be upperclassmen and have this system perfected. And just as importantly they will be great leaders to underclassmen beneath them that know exactly what it means to play Illini basketball.
 
#81      
Do people not realize how bad our defense is?

Twenty-five turnovers ain't too bad against Sparty. It's one thing their size couldn't defeat. Before the intentional foul routine at the very end, we had closed to within ten points. I wonder whether we could have continued that pace, but we were gaining on the #6 team in the nation.
 
#82      
You're not wrong, but it's not all about winning right now. BU is trying to establish a culture and is teaching a young team. We're picking up the bumps and bruises right now but it should make us stronger in the long run. The goal is 2-3 years from now if a guy commits to UI, he knows exactly what he is coming here to do. Pressure the ball, force turnovers, play fast, push the ball, throw oops, and play with intensity.

Groce won a good amount of games his first year. But after 5 years we still didn't know what his teams were trying to accomplish on the court. He never established an identity.

Ultimately, BU's first year means nothing. You should've learned that lesson from Groce. It's all about where we are in 2-3 years. And I think in 2-3 years these freshmen will be upperclassmen and have this system perfected. And just as importantly they will be great leaders to underclassmen beneath them that know exactly what it means to play Illini basketball.


Exactly!! Next year these guys will have a full year under their belts and will be able to teach the incoming freshmen the system. Then after a couple years you have a team full of experienced players that are showing each incoming class what it takes and you have your culture established. Just got to recruit to the system and it will pay dividends
 
#83      
Like, if you're watching that game tonight, and your immediate takeaway is anything other than "wow, there are levels of athleticism, and we are on a decidedly different one than they are"....I honestly don't know what to tell you.

Michigan State spent a good chunk of the game literally jumping over us and we've got people saying "Boy, maybe we should've slowed this thing down and gotten more half-court looks in this one."

Agreed. It's mind-boggling...
 
#84      
How were their issues different?

Underwood has said that both SFA & OSU teams were always ready to play when the lights came on. That has not been the case at IL this year or in recent years. In addition to then future NBA player Evans at OSU, he said there was a Phil Forte that put up 600 shots a day...or some crazy number...& that guy knew he was not going to the NBA. OSU had offense & their offense hung with Michigan in the NCAA tournament last year. They had a winning culture long before Underwood arrived that we have not had.

Underwood was 89-14 at SFA & turned around a previous losing record at OSU to 20-13. I respect all of the effort our guys give & appreciate all of their hard work. But we just do not have the height, athleticism nor experience the upper echelon teams such as MSU do. I mean if we had all or any of that, Groce would still be here.

So with all due respect, pack line defense would not be the magic next step.
 
#86      
Last time we forced 25 TO's out of a team was 2005 against some team named Arizona. The hustle to the end was impressive. Good atmosphere for Ayo to be at. #WeWillWin
 
#87      
It was a serious question. In what year do you think Underwood will have a roster that will be fair for us to criticize the result of his high pressure defense.

Every game our guys step on the floor they are at an immediate disadvantage because of what Underwood is asking them to do.

I don't understand this at all. Last night was really the only game we lost where we actually got beat. Wisconsin was effort. Every other loss is from stupid mistakes and lack of execution.
 
#88      
We beat #1 Indiana at home with Groce. Losing by 13 or whatever it was at home to a #6 team and we all act like its a win? Effort, sure. Talent, coaching, non-existent.

I'm not sure where your expectations were going into this game, but I'm impressed with where your optimism was. This team over-achieved in this game. The size and athleticism mismatch was just too much to overcome.

They played as well as could be hoped - particularly considering LB's foul problems. The key is sustaining it game in and game out and closing games, both of which are controllable. It wont' get us in the tourney, but it'll set us up well for the future.
 
#89      
Good effort tonight was nice to see after the disaster on Friday at Wisconsin, but tonight also unfortunately showed how far away we are from competing with the top of the conference. Our lack of size allowed Michigan State to do whatever it wanted offensively when it didn't turn the ball over. With it looking like no immediate help in the size department next year it is looking more and more like a potential 3 or 4 year rebuild. Hard to believe how low the program has fallen. Looks like programs future may largely be based on Underwood's ability to get a couple quality bigs in the 19 class which probably means next year is another year out of the tourney unless we hit a home run with a 5th year transfer which isn't likely. Hard to stay patient for 3 or 4 years and believe in the rebuild but not a lot of other choices right now
 
#91      
Of course not. I never said its the only reason. Our biggest disadvantage is our athleticism. The exact same thing that a high pressure defense relies on. Doubling down on this philosophy is mind boggling to me.

Do people not realize how bad our defense is? I mean.....am I that crazy to think a change is needed. Next year's roster ain't gonna be much different.

Except we add a 5* and 1 or two bigs...... I think that is much different
 
#92      
The problem is I have seen great effort from small high school teams and y league teams...that doesn't make a great coach. Great coaches have a scheme and strategy that works. They use players correctly and use sets that are effective against the opponents. Is that what we are seeing?



What did you not like about last night scheme


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#93      
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/coll...cle_01f36937-51ad-516e-b78f-a50ecbe4ed40.html

“I liked the team I coached tonight a lot,” Illinois coach Brad Underwood said. “The name the Fighting Illini, that was us tonight. Compared to what I watched Friday night, this was a little different. We’ve got to grow, we’ve got to understand that’s the way the game’s played. Michigan State is who they are. That’s what they do every night.”

I just realized its only been 30 days since the Braggin rights game....seems like a lifetime ago
 
#95      
MSU was bigger, faster, stronger... If Illini wins another game this year, Underwood should get "Coach of the Year" votes.
 
#96      
Lol...I thought that was obvious. Applying pressure to the point where you either steal the ball or give up a layup or a dunk rarely works against talented teams with skilled athletes. There are a lot of ways to play this game. I just don't think we have the athletes to play this style and I think it puts so many players in a position to fail.

Yeah, you pack our defense in a zone or try to keep up with man to man & MSU shoots over the top all night long of a shorter less athletic team. The margin of loss would have been at least double.
 
#97      
Yeah, you pack our defense in a zone or try to keep up with man to man & MSU shoots over the top all night long of a shorter less athletic team. The margin of loss would have been at least double.

Maybe true, but those aren't the only options. There are numerous variations to defenses.
 
#98      
Lol...I thought that was obvious. Applying pressure to the point where you either steal the ball or give up a layup or a dunk rarely works against talented teams with skilled athletes. There are a lot of ways to play this game. I just don't think we have the athletes to play this style and I think it puts so many players in a position to fail.

Playing a zone or packline D against a team with as much talent as MSU would work better you think?

Instead of 25 TO's they would have had maybe 7, which would have given them 18 more chances to score.

When you play a superior team you have to shorten the game, not lengthen it. The fewer possessions, the better your chances. Basketball 101.
 
#99      
Lol...I thought that was obvious. Applying pressure to the point where you either steal the ball or give up a layup or a dunk rarely works against talented teams with skilled athletes. There are a lot of ways to play this game. I just don't think we have the athletes to play this style and I think it puts so many players in a position to fail.

The defensive scheme was great last night. The biggest issue is that we are not able to score of the turnovers.
 
#100      
I think we should pack it in as much as possible. 5 guys in the paint at all times, maybe even packed in between the blocks.

That’ll show em
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back