Deleted member 631370
D
Guest
Again, it has nothing to do with "claims." My post was in response to a statement about Mark Smith under-performing his ranking/rating under Brad Underwood. That statement is not true. For "most" fans, which I believe is true, it was the Mr. Basketball award (which for me is becoming more and more irrelevant in national recruiting). For others, as a mentioned, it can be other "elements", for you it was the "BU statement" or the "rise/improvement" etc. But the bottom line, as I said in previous post, the statement that Mark Smith is under-performing his ranking/rating under Brad Underwood is incorrect.
Whether Mark Smith is underperforming fan expectation for whatever reason, based on elements and factors that fans value most (e.g., BU statement, improvement in HS, etc.) is a totally different discussion. Everyone can have their own expectations based on what they value most.
Well, even if we restrict the expectation solely to his #90 aggregate ranking, the bolded part is certainly up from debate.
I'll certainly withhold judgment until after the final game is played, but he's on pace to average 3 points, 0.8 rebounds, and 1 assist per game in Big Ten play. For context, he has more fouls than he has rebounds and assists COMBINED, and he's shooting 30% from the field.
If that's the baseline expectation for a top-100 guard, then I guess we can agree to disagree.
Damonte is sorta where I had him pegged given the injury.