Except there is absolutely nothing statistically that shows Illinois is playing 4 on 5 when Ty is on the floor. Ty currently in B10 play has a 1.172ppp offensive efficiency on 18.9% possession share. That is good for 19th best within the B10. That is not the numbers of a black hole on offense or a void. By comparison, Coleman has a 1.232ppp offensive efficiency on 18.6% possession share in conference (7th best in the B10). If you look at offensive impact, Coleman is considered +3.6pts better offensively than the average player. Ty? +3.3.
You're making it seem Ty just drags the team down out there on offense, when that is far far far from the case. Ty statistically is Top 500 in offensive efficiency, just outside top 500 in effective field goal percentage, top 200 in offensive rebounding, he's our best rebounding guard, he's 2nd best assisting guard, our best guard in steals, our 2nd best guard in blocks, our 2nd best defensive guard.
So at what point do we actually appreciate Ty for what he is vs what imaginary guard you want him to be? I think everybody in the universe knows he's not going to walk out and be Steph Curry, but Ty just being Ty is damn good. You don't trust Ty for "reasons", those reasons being he's not a stereotypical PG and you don't trust that. Fine. But he's what we've freakin got. John Stockton ain't walking through the door this season. We need to just accept that and move on. TSJ isn't Michael Jordan and Coleman isn't Tim Duncan yet we still play them in crunch time. Why? Because they're the best we have and they're pretty damn good at what we do.
Honestly this Ty argument infuriates me. There is no basis in reality where he hasn't been one of our Top 5 players this season and he has done nothing to show he shouldn't be on the court to close a game out other than "reasons" where he's not some fans PG of choice, and that seems to include Brad. Just makes no sense to me, I'm sorry.