Penn State 90, Illinois 89 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#776      
I can sympathize with everyone's concern with the performance for 39:20 that got us to up 7 with the ball with 40 seconds left. Penn State isn't that good and only a thermonuclear TSJ kept our heads above water in a game that featured quite a few boneheaded plays (though I don't think the defensive performance on the whole was quite as bad as the Zach Hamer QAnon Brigade wants to declare). But y'know, life on the road in the Big Ten, survive and advance, etc. I can't be that mad about a reasonably comfortable road win where we dominated the middle 20 minutes.

It's the 4 or 5 moments in that last 40 seconds where you could be forgiven for thinking we were trying to lose the game on purpose from there that I just can't believe I saw from this veteran team that considers itself to be going places. What was any of that?

Two entirely different things, IMO. We in fact broke PSU pressure and responded to their runs and energy and moments extremely well all game. Until we didn't.
QAnon Brigade? Really?

This ruined a mostly articulate post.
 
#777      

OrangeBlue98

Des Moines, IA
Had we played better defense the game would have been out of reach of PSU, sure. And by no means was it a good defensive performance. The inbounds failures are one thing (though that's really more "special teams"), but I really hated the way we let Nick Kern go wherever he wanted in the 2nd half. We got control over Ace Baldwin as the game went along, but seemingly at the cost of letting their hot hand just have free rein.

All of that said, point totals reflect pace, both teams were happy to have the game be the track meet that it was, and from PSU's initial spurt where they couldn't miss (Wahab hit a jumper!) to 40 seconds left and PSU declining to foul with the game over, we gave up 66 points in like 34 minutes of an end-to-end game in which we scored 82 over the same period.

This is increasingly just kind of a soft and lackadaisical defensive team which is disturbing and a huge problem going forward. But the story of last night's game is that we stopped playing in a game we had won.
I don’t disagree at all with this game in a vacuum. But the defensive problems are a big recurring problem. Even in wins like against Nebraska, the defense has just not been good enough.

Defense is the one constant you can always bring. Even if you’re shooting poorly, good defense can keep you in games. The defense just is not good enough. Illinois is now 19-7, and poor defense has cost them at least four wins (NW, PSU, MSU, Tennessee).

I can accept losing games when you don’t shoot well. Those things happen. But to consistently lose games because you are poor defensively is frustrating. Defense is just effort, coaching, and communication-especially when the team has good athleticism.
 
#778      

blackdog

Champaign
Had we played better defense the game would have been out of reach of PSU, sure. And by no means was it a good defensive performance. The inbounds failures are one thing (though that's really more "special teams"), but I really hated the way we let Nick Kern go wherever he wanted in the 2nd half. We got control over Ace Baldwin as the game went along, but seemingly at the cost of letting their hot hand just have free rein.

All of that said, point totals reflect pace, both teams were happy to have the game be the track meet that it was, and from PSU's initial spurt where they couldn't miss (Wahab hit a jumper!) to 40 seconds left and PSU declining to foul with the game over, we gave up 66 points in like 34 minutes of an end-to-end game in which we scored 82 over the same period.

This is increasingly just kind of a soft and lackadaisical defensive team which is disturbing and a huge problem going forward. But the story of last night's game is that we stopped playing in a game we had won.

A high possession game doesn't account for the fact that PSU shot 54% from the field and 44% from 3 while only turning the ball over 6 times. This from a team that on the season is averaging 44% from the field and 33% from 3 with 11 turnovers a game. That's bad defense.

It can't be just that we play a high tempo game when every single team shoots above their season averages against us. It used to be we would be expecting to lower a teams shooting averages after a game.
 
#780      
I'm not sure what game you were watching, but the defense was abysmal. I lost count of the number of layups Kern had, and they weren't heavily contested layups either.
I'll stand up a little for Gritty here. I think when everyone was losing their minds about our defense when PSU started 6 of 6 from the field, I actually didn't think our defense was all that bad outside of one possession. But after those first 5-8 minutes, our defense basically was non-existent. A big part of that issue from what I saw was Ty being in foul trouble. Our guards outside of TSJ and Ty struggle guarding anyone, so losing him for long periods is a major strain on our defense.

That said, the biggest issues are that Luke is too slow to defend anyone in the B10, Marcus is a defensive liability but his offense more than makes up for it, and Justin has terrible off-ball awareness and a slow 1st step. It also doesn't help that Quincy has taken a major step back and is no longer the aggressive or imposing force he was earlier in the season, and Coleman is completely overburdened and getting no support. Not only is everyone except for TSJ and Ty giving up easy paths to the basket every possession, they also aren't helping Coleman down low with quick doubles. Overall, the defense is indeed a mess and we're paper thin defensively at all positions.
 
#784      
Thinking to himself "I wonder if the boys are familiar with the matador defense."


View attachment 31352
We have it mastered
Lachlan Murdoch Reaction GIF by Murdoch Mysteries
 
#785      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
A high possession game doesn't account for the fact that PSU shot 54% from the field and 44% from 3 while only turning the ball over 6 times. This from a team that on the season is averaging 44% from the field and 33% from 3 with 11 turnovers a game. That's bad defense.

It can't be just that we play a high tempo game when every single team shoots above their season averages against us. It used to be we would be expecting to lower a teams shooting averages after a game.
I'll stand up a little for Gritty here. I think when everyone was losing their minds about our defense when PSU started 6 of 6 from the field, I actually didn't think our defense was all that bad outside of one possession. But after those first 5-8 minutes, our defense basically was non-existent. A big part of that issue from what I saw was Ty being in foul trouble. Our guards outside of TSJ and Ty struggle guarding anyone, so losing him for long periods is a major strain on our defense.

That said, the biggest issues are that Luke is too slow to defend anyone in the B10, Marcus is a defensive liability but his offense more than makes up for it, and Justin has terrible off-ball awareness and a slow 1st step. It also doesn't help that Quincy has taken a major step back and is no longer the aggressive or imposing force he was earlier in the season, and Coleman is completely overburdened and getting no support. Not only is everyone except for TSJ and Ty giving up easy paths to the basket every possession, they also aren't helping Coleman down low with quick doubles. Overall, the defense is indeed a mess and we're paper thin defensively at all positions.
My overall issue with us on defense is that in pursuit of not fouling (which we do very very well most nights, we avoid cheapies and regularly have positive free throw margins) we just end up kinda hands-off and soft. We've swung the pendulum too far away from physicality.

For me, in any sport at any level THE cardinal sin is being easy to play against, letting the other team play the way they like playing, in their rhythm. I see some of that in this team especially on the defensive end and that's really worrying.

(You could definitely argue that all of this flows from not having real guards, but that's a whole other kettle of fish.)
 
Last edited:
#786      
I thought our defense was pretty good at the beginning of the year, swarming. Now not so much. To me this is a complaint that is pretty constant against Underwood. We don't really adjust. Sounds like in the past, it was Gentry who made the adjustment at Ok State which ultimately got Underwood this job, and Gentry again that changed our defensive philosophy in the early Underwood years where our defense was consistently laughable.

To me this season is pretty clear, we almost beat Purdue because Domask just backed down their smaller players and physically dominated. Very quickly, other coaches adjusted and largely took that away. Teams have quickly adjusted to our switching defense and exploited it. Teams know some of our guys over pursue and a simple shot fake will get you an open look. Other Big Ten coaches are very good. They will look at our tape and say here's how we can win.

Now we have a lot of talent, and a sure fire All American in Shannon, so we can win just on talent advantage alone. But people keep talking about these late game collapses. I don't think it is that difficult to figure out. We don't have a PG. As the game gets more desperate, the opponents apply more full court pressure. When that happens, we really struggle.

What I would be afraid of come March is a 13 or 12 seed saying, we're just going to go balls to the wall and press these guys for 40 minutes. If they beat us so be it, but I think this is our best chance to pull the upset. And quite frankly it is. I think the only reason we don't see more press is because most major teams just don't practice it. They don't want their guys so tired from defense they can't play offense. But smaller schools, have historically been more likely to press.
 
#787      
Obviously, this game sucked. My poor dog accidentally wore a water bottle over it from frustration, which I blame on CH lol. But, it's over with. Nothing we can change and we will still get to watch a team in March. CH has been great this year and he will bounce back for us. I'd like to see less looking at refs and more hustling back on D, and I believe that will be corrected. Yes, I'm taking the positive approach here lol.

However, I'd be lying if I said I wasn't worried about Iowa. I'm in the QC with many Iowa fans and I cannot listen to this... We need to stop them from getting in the dance. After last night, myself and my pup need this lol. That's all, sorry for the rant!
 
#788      
I can tell you one thing, even though our defense sucked last night and has been bad for a while, I agree with the fact that everything that could’ve gone wrong in the last minute or so did go wrong last night. There was like a 1 percent chance that all those things happen and it unfortunately happened. If just one of those things went right, we would’ve won. That’s not going to happen very frequently.
 
#789      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
I thought our defense was pretty good at the beginning of the year, swarming. Now not so much. To me this is a complaint that is pretty constant against Underwood. We don't really adjust. Sounds like in the past, it was Gentry who made the adjustment at Ok State which ultimately got Underwood this job, and Gentry again that changed our defensive philosophy in the early Underwood years where our defense was consistently laughable.
To be clear, the legendary OSU adjustment was to just sit back on defense, play run and gun with Jawun Evans and outscore everybody. #1 offense #155 defense per Kenpom that season.

And the trap-happy insanely aggressive D that was the calling card of BU's Stephen F. Austin teams and most of his first two seasons here was mothballed when Kofi arrived and hasn't been seen since. Good riddance, doesn't work at this level, and BU has adapted wonderfully.
 
#790      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
I'm sitting here this morning looking at my large CHIEF flag hanging on the wall in my living room as I try to think what to post after last night's numbing loss...........I want to give my opinion about what went wrong but my mind is still reeling after the meltdown with being up 7 , with the ball possession and only 40 seconds left in the game..........This is where my stomach starts churning and my head starts moving left , then right in a dizzying display of nauseous motion........No sleep last night , no matter how or what I tried.........

As a life long Illini fan of over 65 years I know I'm too invested in every game that the Illini programs play and a loss like last night just throws my equilibrium off so much that I feel lethargic and listless and don't want to even move that much.........It's my burden and I try to handle it the best I can , but sometimes it just consumes me and my emotions........

This won't be the last game that affects me this way , but , damn , it's hard to even think about Saturday right now for me......

It really really really really really is.............JMHO...........................
 
#791      
I'll stand up a little for Gritty here. I think when everyone was losing their minds about our defense when PSU started 6 of 6 from the field, I actually didn't think our defense was all that bad outside of one possession. But after those first 5-8 minutes, our defense basically wTas non-existent. A big part of that issue from what I saw was Ty being in foul trouble. Our guards outside of TSJ and Ty struggle guarding anyone, so losing him for long periods is a major strain on our defense.

That said, the biggest issues are that Luke is too slow to defend anyone in the B10, Marcus is a defensive liability but his offense more than makes up for it, and Justin has terrible off-ball awareness and a slow 1st step. It also doesn't help that Quincy has taken a major step back and is no longer the aggressive or imposing force he was earlier in the season, and Coleman is completely overburdened and getting no support. Not only is everyone except for TSJ and Ty giving up easy paths to the basket every possession, they also aren't helping Coleman down low with quick doubles. Overall, the defense is indeed a mess and we're paper thin defensively at all positions.
Ty is one of our better defenders but even he struggles keeping quicker players in front of him and ends up getting in foul trouble. TSJ is the only one that can consistently handle the quicker players mainly because if they do get by him he can make up for it with his length and shot blocking ability.
 
#792      
Burn the ugly blue uniforms. When I turned on the game, I immediately thought we would lose.
 
#793      
Literally felt like punching the TV, worst loss in recent memory, with so much on the line, those clowns lose to a team that was riding a three game losing streak and was without one of their best players. Totally unacceptable and disappointing, especially given the seniority of the team.
 
Last edited:
#795      
I feel bad for Coleman in how the game ended for him. Missing two possible game clinching free throws and fouling on the 3 point attempt at the end. He should have been smarter than that to put himself in that kind of position to get that foul. However I will say I have seen a lot more contact at the end of a game and no call. I don't think anyone else has mentioned this but it was actually Luke's man who shot that three on Hawkins foul. Hawkins and Domask were both engaged with their men on a ball screening action when Luke's man came over the top of them with him trailing (as usual). Yes, would have been nice to have Ty in at that time.
 
Last edited:
#796      

GrayGhost77

Centennial, CO
That's about as kind and respectful of terminology as I can think of for what folks are doing with this 29 year old minor staff member.
Sorry, but no. He SHOULD be a minor staff member, but if he's as in charge of orchestrating the abomination of a defensive scheme we've been playing as has been hinted at, then he (and Brad) deserve as much vitriol as they are receiving. Maybe not enough, honestly.
 
#798      

uofi7477

Silver & Gold Vandals
Well, it doesn't have to be "either or."
 
#799      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
Sorry, but no. He SHOULD be a minor staff member, but if he's as in charge of orchestrating the abomination of a defensive scheme we've been playing as has been hinted at, then he (and Brad) deserve as much vitriol as they are receiving. Maybe not enough, honestly.
I really don't want to get into it.

All I will say is that over the decades this has come up in a lot of different contexts in both sports and I never have and never will waver (because it's the truth) from the firm framework that all responsibility in a college sports program lies directly with the head coach, and trying to subdivide beyond that is a fool's errand. I have problems with this beyond that, but let's just leave it there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.