I disagree. This turns late leads into insurmountable mountains. It’s like high school basketball with no shot clock and a lead in the last 2 minutes
Fouling is basically breaking the rules, so allowing a strategy based on that to get a team back in the game seems to go against the intent of sportsmanship
I know the team that is down needs to find a way to conserve clock, so I get fouling and am okay with it, but the other team should have a say in what comes after the foul instead of being forced to shoot two shots at one point each when the losing team can then get the ball back and shoot one shot for two or maybe three points.
Allowing the winning team the choice to simply throw the ball in makes the losing team have to expend ANOTHER foul if they don’t get the steal...which will add up quicker and be more of a detriment...as fouls should.
It also gives more options to the winning team in case their version of Kofi is hacked instead of a good FT shooter.