hooraybeer
- Pittsburgh, PA
when will/would fatigue start playing a role? tomorrow? Saturday?
I give Illinois a decent chance of upsetting Purdue. I see, unfortunately, no chance against Indiana.
Go tomorrow if you can!
Based upon BTT history, we can easily go 3 games. Fatigue seems to set in during game 4 (historically the Championship game), and particularly in the 2nd half of that game.when will/would fatigue start playing a role? tomorrow? Saturday?
Exactly. You nailed it.As with the first meeting, an interesting match up. They dominate inside, but our guards are much better. IIRC last time we doubled their post a lot and dared them to make 3s. Seems like a good strategy to try again....
As with the first meeting, an interesting match up. They dominate inside, but our guards are much better. IIRC last time we doubled their post a lot and dared them to make 3s. Seems like a good strategy to try again....
Purdue did not play well if you watch the film. Yes we game-planned the right way. They took the open 3's and missed enough. Their size/talent differential SHOULD enable them to just force their will on us inside, regardless of doubles.
Here's hoping they go back out to the arc.
Our only shot at the post-season is winning this whole thing.
The odds of us winning 5 games in 5 days is slim no matter who we play. Goes down considerably if we have to face Indiana, Michigan St, Maryland or Wisconsin.
To win 5 games in 5 days, the bench needs to play more minutes than usual, the team needs to shoot well from deep (2 for 2 on that front) and the team has to dig deep and play over their heads. Not impossible, nor not likely.
Does Groce start playing the subs more in this game v. Purdue knowing that Hill, Nunn and JCL have to stay fresh for us to have a chance in the semi-finals should we beat Purdue? Or, does he go all out to beat Purdue, make the semi's thus salvaging the season somewhat. Making the semi's would be a good way to end the year and give them momentum going into next season.
I'm kind of blabbing, but thoughts?
Our only shot at the post-season is winning this whole thing.
The odds of us winning 5 games in 5 days is slim no matter who we play. Goes down considerably if we have to face Indiana, Michigan St, Maryland or Wisconsin.
To win 5 games in 5 days, the bench needs to play more minutes than usual, the team needs to shoot well from deep (2 for 2 on that front) and the team has to dig deep and play over their heads. Not impossible, nor not likely.
Does Groce start playing the subs more in this game v. Purdue knowing that Hill, Nunn and JCL have to stay fresh for us to have a chance in the semi-finals should we beat Purdue? Or, does he go all out to beat Purdue, make the semi's thus salvaging the season somewhat. Making the semi's would be a good way to end the year and give them momentum going into next season.
I'm kind of blabbing, but thoughts?
You worry about one game at a time. Saving legs for the next day would and should only cross their minds if there's a complete blowout.Our only shot at the post-season is winning this whole thing.
The odds of us winning 5 games in 5 days is slim no matter who we play. Goes down considerably if we have to face Indiana, Michigan St, Maryland or Wisconsin.
To win 5 games in 5 days, the bench needs to play more minutes than usual, the team needs to shoot well from deep (2 for 2 on that front) and the team has to dig deep and play over their heads. Not impossible, nor not likely.
Does Groce start playing the subs more in this game v. Purdue knowing that Hill, Nunn and JCL have to stay fresh for us to have a chance in the semi-finals should we beat Purdue? Or, does he go all out to beat Purdue, make the semi's thus salvaging the season somewhat. Making the semi's would be a good way to end the year and give them momentum going into next season.
I'm kind of blabbing, but thoughts?
I get what some are saying on here about Austin's few timely contributions but he and Tate look pretty substantially out of place on the floor. It was really bad when both were on the court at the same time. No wonder there are scoring droughts when they are playing 5v4 or worse 5v3. I was surprised Tate played as much later in the second half. It is obvious to me at least that Lewis brings much more to the table even if he occasionally forces things. Tate is a great passer but he is absolutely no threat to score and not a great defender. Going to be very hard to justify playing time next season barring any injuries. Austin as a walk on makes his play justifiable and even admirable. He is simply out classed as an athlete compare to the others on the court.
I get what some are saying on here about Austin's few timely contributions but he and Tate look pretty substantially out of place on the floor. It was really bad when both were on the court at the same time. No wonder there are scoring droughts when they are playing 5v4 or worse 5v3. I was surprised Tate played as much later in the second half. It is obvious to me at least that Lewis brings much more to the table even if he occasionally forces things. Tate is a great passer but he is absolutely no threat to score and not a great defender. Going to be very hard to justify playing time next season barring any injuries. Austin as a walk on makes his play justifiable and even admirable. He is simply out classed as an athlete compare to the others on the court.
I think the thing that bothers me most about tate, and I've been a big supporter of him in the past, is his seeming lack of urgency. He wastes way too much time walking the ball up the court, especially against the press, or dribbling around not running offense, particularly towards the end of the game today. He's not a ball stopper in the sense that starks was, but there's so many times when I want to yell at him through the tv to get going.
Yes you are. We've had this enthusiasm all year long, for the most part. The difference is we're executing the game plan better defensively and moving the ball better offensively.