He played against a soft cover 2 with 3-4 rushers for one series against Minny and then Indiana gets 0 pressure on the QB
Did Paddock not come into the Penn State game and outplay Altmeyer in that game?
He played against a soft cover 2 with 3-4 rushers for one series against Minny and then Indiana gets 0 pressure on the QB
Once they put the 2nd and 3rd string in sure.Did Paddock not come into the Penn State game and outplay Altmeyer in that game?
Maybe so, but still: most yards ever thrown by an Illini QB in Memorial Stadium.He played against a soft cover 2 with 3-4 rushers for one series against Minny and then Indiana gets 0 pressure on the QB
Well I guess it was a good thing Altmeyer wasn't able to play or he would have hung 700 yards on them.Paddock had the best QB performance against Indiana, there's no doubt. That said, we do not need to prop up Indiana's defense by showing a small sliver of details in the hopes of proving they were good. This is lacking a lot of context.
Some of these QBs (McCord, McCarthy, Allar) had their teams winning comfortably so they stopped throwing the ball. Louisville was thrashing Indiana by running the ball (184 rushing yards) and built a big first half lead. Indiana State sucks and we shouldn't compare our team to theirs.
That leaves Irons, Wimsatt, and Locke. Irons and Wimsatt didn't throw it well but they epically destroyed Indiana by running. Irons had 140+ rushing yards and two rushing TDs, giving him over 330 total yards. I watched this game, he was gashing Indiana at will. Irons hurt his knee later in the season but his rushing against Indiana was 60% of his season rushing production. Wimsatt did the same, 140+ rushing yards in a comfortable win. Rutgers stopped throwing the ball because they had a comfortable lead. Locke stinks so far, but his best QB rating game? Against Indiana. When factoring in rushing (removing sacks), six QBs have put up 300+ total offense against Indiana. That's not a good defense. Again, this isn't taking anything away from Paddock. Paddock doesn't scramble, so the rushing value wasn't really an option. So he destroyed them through the air. But we don't need to act like the Indiana defense is good. It's a bad defense. They've proven it all year against a variety of opponents.
We have 4 years of stats to prove Paddock isn't the next Tom Brady lol
We have 4 years of stats to prove Paddock isn't the next Tom Brady lol
G | Cmp | Att | Pct | Yds | Y/G | TD | TD/G | Int | Int/G |
29 | 395 | 638 | 61.9 | 4773 | 164.6 | 30 | 1.034 | 17 | 0.586 |
22 | 349 | 576 | 60.6 | 3628 | 164.9 | 24 | 1.091 | 16 | 0.727 |
Exactly. Starting Luke will make Bret look like a genius IF it goes well. If not, he’ll be blamed for putting a dusty old rule or alleged promises to Luke ahead of team success. He’ll hear endless “if only” regrets from disappointed fans. Starting Paddock has no downside from a customer perspective. Season ticket sales are at risk too.At some point Bret has to remember that he is CEO of an entertainment business masquerading as amateur sport, and optics rule the world in today's day and age. The optics here are heavily in the opposite direction from everything we're hearing out of media and fans, and what I've seen with my own eyes over the last two weeks.
That's a gigantic loss for them. The door is creaking open, we've gotta bust through itWord on the street is DeJean is hurt and done for the year
Different circumstances, different teams. Different coaches, different schemes.We have 4 years of stats to prove Paddock isn't the next Tom Brady lol
Guys, ya got this all wrong. I'm tellin ya. Paddock isn't the next Tom Brady. He's the next Aaron Rodgers. (with less drama)
G Cmp Att Pct Yds Y/G TD TD/G Int Int/G 29 395 638 61.9 4773 164.6 30 1.034 17 0.586 22 349 576 60.6 3628 164.9 24 1.091 16 0.727
Obviously different competition, and you could probably throw in some other things, but these are the stats of Brady and Paddock over their careers. Interceptions being the biggest difference.
No wait, I forgot. I reported last year that Tommie D is next Aaron Rodgers. Paddock is the next one after that.Guys, ya got this all wrong. I'm tellin ya. Paddock isn't the next Tom Brady. He's the next Aaron Rodgers. (with less drama)
there indeed were a number of passes that were a little under thrown and our guys still were able to catch themPaddock was launching passes up in the air where our WRs just had to sit and wait for them to come down. Can't imagine Iowa D will allow that.
To those hoops posters who said this week "I'm glad Kolek is playing, we want to beat their best", or words to that effect - I want to win. I am not happy Cooper is hurt but I am happy he is out. Trust me the victory Saturday, should it happen, will not taste any less sweet.
At least we won't have to worry about did he call fair catch or not.To those hoops posters who said this week "I'm glad Kolek is playing, we want to beat their best", or words to that effect - I want to win. I am not happy Cooper is hurt but I am happy he is out. Trust me the victory Saturday, should it happen, will not taste any less sweet.
Heck, just the reduced strain on my heart during every Iowa KO or punt return will be worth it.
Sorry, not buying the "it was just Indiana defense".....
Vs Indiana Defense:
Kyle McCord OSU 20-33 239 1int
Evan Olaes IN St 3-9 21 1 int wtaf
Jack Plummer LOU13-23 238 1TD 1 int
DJ Irons Akron 22-35 194 2 int
Taulia Tagovailoa MD 24-34 352 5 TD the only one even remotely close
JJ McCarthy scUM 14-17 222 3 TD
Gavin Wimsatt RU 5-12 39 seriously
Drew Allar PU 20-31 210 3 TD 1 int
Braeden Locke 21-41 243 2 TD
John MF Paddock 24-36 507 4 TD 1 int
My comment might have been a bit too blunt. My issue isn’t so much with Luke, but the “Starters don’t lose their jobs here because of injury” explanation. The starter should be the player who gives you the best chance to win, period. If you happened to realize that the backup was better because the starter got hurt, so be it.
Would be nice if our 250# Fr RB is available to do just thatThat's a gigantic loss for them. The door is creaking open, we've gotta bust through it
I get you are an insider, but come on dude ... you're giving off the vibe like it's a no-brainer to start Altmyer and those of us wanting the guy who just broke a school record to continue to be the starter are just like missing information, haha. At the very least, thinking Paddock should start is ENTIRELY reasonable, even if you think it is not the move to make here.Once they put the 2nd and 3rd string in sure.
Ive heard that athletes all over Iowa were quick to get on the over.That's a gigantic loss for them. The door is creaking open, we've gotta bust through it