pruman91
- Paducah, Ky
Ive heard that athletes all over Iowa were quick to get on the over.
I " BET " that's true and factual................................
Ive heard that athletes all over Iowa were quick to get on the over.
Yeah and the first possession he was in, he was missing receivers big time.Once they put the 2nd and 3rd string in sure.
Slightly different situations. I wanted to see how the hoops team stacked up against a final four caliber team in an early season game on our home floor. On the other hand, this game is huge at this point in the season and I am super glad that DeJean is out. Hopefully it helps us get that 6th win.To those hoops posters who said this week "I'm glad Kolek is playing, we want to beat their best", or words to that effect - I want to win. I am not happy Cooper is hurt but I am happy he is out. Trust me the victory Saturday, should it happen, will not taste any less sweet.
Heck, just the reduced strain on my heart during every Iowa KO or punt return will be worth it.
The rule isn't iron clad. Feagin started over a recovered Love.Does this also mean Love is the #1 starter at RB the rest of the season since he was out with injury a bunch of games? Know running back position tends to use more depth so little different but BB tries to word things carefully.
I don't agree with BB on all decisions made but I do trust him with this program. Go Illini!
Preach!!!I’m sure there are compelling reasons to start Altmyer that have nothing to do with game planning for Iowa and perhaps a few reasons that in fact do have to do with game planning for Iowa. For instance, Altmyer is certainly more mobile and can gain yards with his legs.
But it’s kind of comical to me have quickly we’re now pivoting to the rationalization that it totally makes sense to start Altmyer because the performances we just saw from Paddock were actually not remarkable or special at all because anyone could convert on 4th and long and drive the length of the field on three completions if the defense is playing a soft cover two, and heck who can’t set historic passing records in a game including a walk-off TD when facing an opposing defense that has a slightly below FBS average (ranked #81 in sacks) pass rush. I’m sure it totally won’t be another 43 years until another Illini QB throws for 500+ yards in a game.
Justify starting Altmyer for whatever reason, that’s fine. But let’s please not pretend that it’s not a huge risk to yank the cord on the QB that got you to this spot by delivering two consecutive, mind-boggling historical all-time performances. If the decision backfires, there’s going to a fan and media backlash like we’ve never seen. People are not going to just brush it off and say “Eh, that Paddock thing was a fluke anyway. I mean, who did he even play? The important thing even though we lost out and missed a bowl game is that we held firm to the principle that starters don’t lose their jobs to injury.”
Yet, we've been debating it for days.Everybody is overthinking this. This is simply a QB with zero to lose going out on his terms and slinging it. And he is insane hot. This isn't about his past or his future....this is about right now and beating Iowa.
He is our best player not named Jer Zahn or Isaiah right now. That is not even remotely debatable.
In that scenario, we'd be forced to start Cal Swanson.it begs the question:
if Paddock had thrown for 735 yards and set the D1 record, would that have been enough to lock in the start ?
Dude, I just looked at your recent posts … did Paddock like kick your dog?? Or are you just someone who gets off on talking down to others who are ~less realistic~ than you are?Yeah and the first possession he was in, he was missing receivers big time.
I agree. I bet even Altmyer unsderstands that. I'm also not sure it is even fair to Atmeyer himself to start?Everybody is overthinking this. This is simply a QB with zero to lose going out on his terms and slinging it. And he is insane hot. This isn't about his past or his future....this is about right now and beating Iowa.
He is our best player not named Jer Zahn or Isaiah right now. That is not even remotely debatable.
The point's probably already been made but I agree with this one. Altmeyer is being set up to fail. Fair or not, folks are going to hold up what he does against one of the best defenses in the country against what Paddock did last week, and if it's not good enough, you'll never hear the end of how the wrong guy was in there. If you start Paddock he's playing with house money and you can pull him at any time knowing that people will understand why you did it, because they will have seen him fail with their own two eyes.I agree. I bet even Altmyer unsderstands that. I'm also not sure it is even fair to Atmeyer himself to start?
Yet, we've been debating it for days.
Welcome to the threadAm the only one not happy about killing the momentum our team has with JP by starting Luke ?
That’s the inevitable comparison. Unless LA can dominate Iowa, a common interpretation will be he was a big step backward from JP. Yes, it’s a tougher team but that will still be what fans see and conclude. It could collapse fan morale. If I sense a blowout I’ll be inclined to stop watching in disgust over what might have been.Altmeyer is being set up to fail. Fair or not, folks are going to hold up what he does against one of the best defenses in the country against what Paddock did last week, and if it's not good enough, you'll never hear the end of how the wrong guy was in there. If you start Paddock he's playing with house money and you can pull him at any time knowing that people will understand why you did it, because they will have seen him fail with their own two eyes.