Unless you're Purdue most away games are. Michigan shouldn't be this bad.That means that vegas thinks this is a toss up game
Unless you're Purdue most away games are. Michigan shouldn't be this bad.That means that vegas thinks this is a toss up game
Our depth? We play 6, begrudgingly 7.That Vegas line has me nervous…hard not to like us in this spot though. If we’re locked in on defense this game is ours. I think Michigan needs a Doug McDaniel 25+ point bonkers performance paired with Terrence Williams hitting at least 3 or 4 from deep to pull this off. I think our depth wears on them throughout the game especially since this is a matchup where we can roll out Dain
We are an enigma. I don't think that anyone knows who we actually are and they includes Vegas. Maryland wasn't a good look and we haven't won a road game without TJ. Everything is very much TBD when it comes to the overall outlook on our season. There's not one game on th schedule that I feel "good" about.That means that vegas thinks this is a toss up game
I was at UI then, watching that game at Murphy's. Very fun times.It has been 22 years and I still remember sitting on the edge of my couch in the final minutes. After Self called that last timeout you knew Frank was going to win it for us, you knew it was inevitable, and you simply were waiting to see what magic he'd conjure. IIRC he lofted that gem to win it over the outstretched arms of the BT defensive POY.
I loved those days. Also, R.I.P. Billy Packer.
I feel pretty good that we will take care of rutgers lol.We are an enigma. I don't think that anyone knows who we actually are and they includes Vegas. Maryland wasn't a good look and we haven't won a road game without TJ. Everything is very much TBD when it comes to the overall outlook on our season. There's not one game on th schedule that I feel "good" about.
It's game by game until we establish a consistency...good or bad.
Hey, 36% are going in, and there is still Max Williams at 0%. On the other hand, Dain's 69% FG shooting is better than any starter by over 20%, and the same was true by 12% last season.FT% has something to do with it as well.
Maybe, but I feel like Omoruyi is a better player than Reese, and we just allowed Reese to absolutely abuse us at our place. They are all a concern until we establish that we can consistently defend and make layups.I feel pretty good that we will take care of rutgers lol.
Reese is more of a “post up and score on you” threat, which we really struggled with (no idea why we didn’t double!), whereas Cliff is more of a lob threat and offensive rebound energy guy.Maybe, but I feel like Omoruyi is a better player than Reese, and we just allowed Reese to absolutely abuse us at our place. They are all a concern until we establish that we can consistently defend and make layups.
Is that all that remains of the game? The comeback started around the minute mark.It has been 22 years and I still remember sitting on the edge of my couch in the final minutes. After Self called that last timeout you knew Frank was going to win it for us, you knew it was inevitable, and you simply were waiting to see what magic he'd conjure. IIRC he lofted that gem to win it over the outstretched arms of the BT defensive POY.
I loved those days. Also, R.I.P. Billy Packer.
Double Reese - like Northwestern did.I actually agree with you, I thought Dain should have played more against MD. Both for his scoring, seeing as how we couldn’t make a layup, and the fact that Coleman really seemed to struggle with Reese’s physicality. That, and MD’s lack of outside shooting made it a prime candidate for a Dain game.
For other matchups I think Brad is finding it hard to get him on the floor given it changes how we play so much. But we can’t keep rolling Coleman and Quincy out there 35+ mpg. Even 10 good minutes from Amani would be huge.
Wait, isn't home court usually good for about 3 points? So wouldn't this mean that on a neutral court we would be 5- or 6-point favorites? Maybe I am reading this incorrectly.That means that vegas thinks this is a toss up game
Apparently, that's the extent of the video online. As with the '05 AZ game, would enjoy seeing the final five mins.Is that all that remains of the game? The comeback started around the minute mark.
I thought it would be about 8 points on a neutral court, so expected the line to be around -5. That said, I do expect a bounce back game. I think the last game was just one of those days. If we do drop this one, though, the board will be in a full meltdown. Not expecting it with the team we have, but the strange spread has me a little nervous going into this one tonight.Wait, isn't home court usually good for about 3 points? So wouldn't this mean that on a neutral court we would be 5- or 6-point favorites? Maybe I am reading this incorrectly.
Either way, I think that line is reasonable. While people might rightfully be concerned after our performance vs. Maryland, that dud still currently sits as an extreme outlier for how this team plays basketball against a large sample size of MUCH better execution and effort - even without TSJ. If you weren't an Illini fan always bracing to be disappointed like I am, you just might say the smart money is that the Illini bounce back here.
That’s the kind of Vegas line I just stay away from or hammer the home team.That Vegas line has me nervous…hard not to like us in this spot though. If we’re locked in on defense this game is ours. I think Michigan needs a Doug McDaniel 25+ point bonkers performance paired with Terrence Williams hitting at least 3 or 4 from deep to pull this off. I think our depth wears on them throughout the game especially since this is a matchup where we can roll out Dain
Bingo.Computers/Lines are still navigating life without Shannon
I have a completely untested theory that bets move our way a disproportionate number of times because of our large fan base. I feel like opposing fans, casual fans and even some Illini fans REALLY underrate how many Illini fans there are. While our fan base size seems to ebb and flow more than a school like Iowa or Wisconsin, the TV ratings, alumni base size, state population, etc. back up us having a very large fan base.