TBH, I somehow had signatures disabled on this site and forgot I had that in there until
someone commented on it last month.

So, when I was updating everything, I figured it was logically consistent to include the entire new Big Ten. However, I agree with your sentiment ... not only is UCLA not traditionally in the Big Ten, they are just an anomaly historically. When I update some other stats, I wanted to make a topic that tracks the top 5-7 historically in the Big Ten for a lot of different categories (e.g., winning percentage, NCAAT appearances, weeks in the AP Poll, etc.).